SKYs Catch

[Laaloo]

 

I still think it was a six as the boundary moved a little. Wish this would have been called a six and then we would still eventually end up winning. Takes some shine off. The 3rd umpire also only saw two replays and made his decision. Meanwhile we have seen in meaningless games, where they go through 10 replays to make a decision. Not sure why he was in so hurry in a crucial game.

 

https://www.wisden.com/series/icc-mens-t20-world-cup-2024/cricket-news/doubts-raised-over-crucial-suryakumar-yadav-catch-due-to-displaced-rope-and-slo-mo-replay

[Chaos]

Go join pakistan forum and support them. Bc. 

[R!TTER]

Wisden still coming for firangi's 3x lagaan?

[Laaloo]

3 minutes ago, R!TTER said:

Wisden still coming for firangi's 3x lagaan?

Looks like at 0.20 seconds he touches the boarding.

[R!TTER]

Not really, check from the beginning, top down view, he was well within the boundary.

 

They discussed this on the final word as well, he was at least 2-3 inches well inside the rope when he first held the catch.

 

https://player.fm/series/the-final-word-cricket-podcast/india-pull-it-out-of-the-fire-t20-world-cup-final-day-29

[kosingh]

I thought it touched too. But too close to call.

 

Pakistan can file an appeal with the ICC on behalf of South Africa.

[goose]

surprised they didn't ask for a better angle. and even more surprised nobody on commentary mentioned it. and as yet nothing from rsa

[R!TTER]

It's optical illusion, the shoe is turning on the grass & wrestling some of it from underneath. The boundary doesn't itself move an mm back & from kind of momentum it should've.

[Norman]

Bruh they literally showed top angle in the broadcast which showed his feet to be a good few inches away from the cushion. Why do we always like to self doubt?

[coffee_rules]

wtf! Man it was clean as a whistle 

 

 

[vvvslaxman]

Umpire went through step by step and declared it is out. End of story. Everything else is coping.

[R!TTER]

1 minute ago, vvvslaxman said:

Everything else is coping.

This wasn't 50/50 like that Green grassed catch in WTC final. It was abso*inlutely clean!

[vvvslaxman]

Just now, R!TTER said:

This wasn't 50/50 like that Green grassed catch in WTC final. It was abso*inlutely clean!

Ya. This is expected from SA fans. Understandable. But we don't really have to focus on that.

[Laaloo]

14 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

wtf! Man it was clean as a whistle 

 

 

Dude you can clearly see at 0.44 seconds his left foot touches the boarding.

[Laaloo]

50 minutes ago, goose said:

surprised they didn't ask for a better angle. and even more surprised nobody on commentary mentioned it. and as yet nothing from rsa

The umpire was in a hurry. He was disappointing. Took two replays without zooming in and made a decision. 

[MK55]

4 minutes ago, Laaloo said:

Dude you can clearly see at 0.44 seconds his left foot touches the boarding.

But at 0.44 is he still holding the ball?

[coffee_rules]

5 minutes ago, Laaloo said:

Dude you can clearly see at 0.44 seconds his left foot touches the boarding.

You can’t say from this angle unles you have binocular eyes! There are other views from top that show it didn’t touch 

[Laaloo]

2 minutes ago, MK55 said:

But at 0.44 is he still holding the ball?

Yeah he's transferring the ball from left to his right hand

[goose]

2 minutes ago, Laaloo said:

The umpire was in a hurry. He was disappointing. Took two replays without zooming in and made a decision. 

yeh agree. kettleborough is saying 'that's in, that's still in' from an awful angle. i'll take the win but come on

[vvvslaxman]

5 minutes ago, goose said:

yeh agree. kettleborough is saying 'that's in, that's still in' from an awful angle. i'll take the win but come on

He can take whole year for that review lol If that skirting is unmoved that is a legit catch. This is a legit catch.