SKYs Catch

[coffee_rules]

This capture is the best so far to rest the case.

 

 

[neel roy]

Secret of the boundary line by Enid Blyton

 

 

[Lord]

8 minutes ago, neel roy said:

Secret of the boundary line by Enid Blyton

 

 

 

As I said boundary had been moved, not SKY's fault but massively incompetent by umpires.

 

SA have right to feel aggrieved.

[neel roy]

6 minutes ago, Lord said:

 

As I said boundary had been moved, not SKY's fault but massively incompetent by umpires.

 

SA have right to feel aggrieved.

India had that extended boundary line for 20 overs as well. India should also feel aggrieved 

[Lord]

Just now, neel roy said:

India had that extended boundary line for 20 overs as well. India should also feel aggrieved 

 

Yes but thankfully no catch. Either ways, pathetic from umps in a final.

[coffee_rules]

30 minutes ago, Lord said:

 

As I said boundary had been moved, not SKY's fault but massively incompetent by umpires.

 

SA have right to feel aggrieved.

Do you have any evidence that the boundary was moved after India’s innings?  If the boundary was same for India, why should only SA feel aggrieved about a moved boundary before the match! 

[Lord]

2 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

Do you have any evidence that the boundary was moved after India’s innings?  If the boundary was same for India, why should only SA feel aggrieved about a moved boundary before the match! 

 

Because there wasn't any boundary catch in Indian innings.

 

Boundary was moved by the four Virat hit as in above video.

[Ultimate_Game]

22 minutes ago, Lord said:

 

Because there wasn't any boundary catch in Indian innings.

 

Boundary was moved by the four Virat hit as in above video.

 

And that 4 was hit in the first couple of overs so the boundary was consistent for both India and SA for majority of the game

[coffee_rules]

44 minutes ago, Lord said:

 

Because there wasn't any boundary catch in Indian innings.

 

Boundary was moved by the four Virat hit as in above video.

Are you trolling? That Kohli boundary was at back of the bowler. Surya caught it at long-off at a stretch. Pulling the boundary hoarding is common and it will be placed back immediately, by the same fielder sometimes. 

[Lord]

27 minutes ago, Ultimate_Game said:

 

And that 4 was hit in the first couple of overs so the boundary was consistent for both India and SA for majority of the game

 

It still wasn't there where it was supposed to be

[Lord]

2 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

Are you trolling? That Kohli boundary was at back of the bowler. Surya caught it at long-off at a stretch. Pulling the boundary hoarding is common and it will be placed back immediately, by the same fielder sometimes. 

 

Its the same area for left hander.

[coffee_rules]

Just now, Lord said:

 

It’s the same area for left hander.

Disagree. It is  way offi! After the innings, they will inspect the boundary line and correct it as a SOP, so they will not leave the hoarding as is. 

[Ultimate_Game]

3 minutes ago, Lord said:

 

It still wasn't there where it was supposed to be

 

What I meant was it wasn't there in its original place, but it was at the same place for both the teams as Kohli hit that shot in the 1st over against Jansen. That means neither team had an advantage, and it was in the same position throughout.

 

Plus we don't know how it would've turned out if the rope was in by a few more inches. SKY placed himself and caught the ball based on the current boundary placement. If the boundary was in its original place, SKY would've factored that in while going for the catch and given the height of the ball, it was still catchable with the boundary a few more inches in.

[Adamant]

So basically yet another point in favour of Kohli.

He won us the finals 

[Nikhil_cric]

The catch that saved India , and Kohli in particular , from ignominy 

[Frustrated]

4 hours ago, Adamant said:

So basically yet another point in favour of Kohli.

He won us the finals 

If we consider the performance of a player in the Final as the only benchmark, then Dube >>> any other Indian batter in this WT20.   

[Adamant]

1 hour ago, Frustrated said:

If we consider the performance of a player in the Final as the only benchmark, then Dube >>> any other Indian batter in this WT20.   

No , he is not.
Kohli was MOTM for a reason.

ifs and buts dont count, show me the reality

[singhvivek141]

6 minutes ago, Adamant said:

No , he is not.
Kohli was MOTM for a reason.

ifs and buts dont count, show me the reality

Agree.

Now people should apologize to MSD as well, who were trolling him for 13 years..he was also MOTM in finals..

Kohli, Zaheer & Gambhir did jack in the finals. Coz they weren't the MOTM.

 

Flunk you Gambhir for asking the justification, it was MS show all along. You didn't win the MOTM...gtfo.

Edited July 9, 2024 by singhvivek141

[Chaos]

My god we STILL talking about skys catch? 

[singhvivek141]

1 minute ago, Chaos said:

My god we STILL talking about skys catch? 

People are still justifying one knock.

2011 WC final controvery repeats all over again.