Muloghonto Posted July 25 Share Posted July 25 4 minutes ago, TellTheTruth said: come on man, you must be able to see the logical fallacies in just this post alone. there are none. The logical fallacy i see is the dude who's entire argument is ad hominem attack, making claims that the one who he is attacking is engaging in emotional ad-hominem attacks. which fits in well with the cognitive dissonance of democrats and americans in general. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coffee_rules Posted July 25 Share Posted July 25 All debates on internet leads to ad hominem attacks and tu tu main main - Murphy’s law Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TellTheTruth Posted July 25 Share Posted July 25 6 minutes ago, coffee_rules said: All debates on internet leads to ad hominem attacks and tu tu main main - Murphy’s law Thats one thing but i dont think this mulogonto guy is capable of making an argument without a logical fallacy as its foundation. I already pointed them out and he responds to them by using more logical fallacies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muloghonto Posted July 25 Share Posted July 25 1 hour ago, TellTheTruth said: Thats one thing but i dont think this mulogonto guy is capable of making an argument without a logical fallacy as its foundation. I already pointed them out and he responds to them by using more logical fallacies. You didnt point out any logical fallacy, you only pointed out ad-hominems you engaged in. All you did, is demonstrate that you are incapable of addressing any of the objective facts i pointed out and ended up in deliberate obfuscation of trying to justify enabling voter fraud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TellTheTruth Posted July 25 Share Posted July 25 6 minutes ago, Muloghonto said: You didnt point out any logical fallacy, you only pointed out ad-hominems you engaged in. All you did, is demonstrate that you are incapable of addressing any of the objective facts i pointed out and ended up in deliberate obfuscation of trying to justify enabling voter fraud. I'm not trying to sound rude or anything, but this post itself is loaded with very obvious logical fallacies. I'm really not sure how to proceed if you can't see that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coffee_rules Posted July 25 Share Posted July 25 (edited) 29 minutes ago, TellTheTruth said: I'm not trying to sound rude or anything, but this post itself is loaded with very obvious logical fallacies. I'm really not sure how to proceed if you can't see that. Instead of schooling us all about logical fallacies, what is it that you want to say? Voter Fraud is fake news? But a lot of people have been caught voting wrongly. No? Is voter fraud not so widespread that it affects elections? Perhaps not. But can we have a system to eliminate voter fraud even if it is 0.0000001%? It’s not that costly to implement voter ID that most of the world has implemented. What’s the push back for? Next, mail-in voters regulation. Can we have a system to eliminate any fraud in mail-in votes, instead of debating if it happens or not. World’s most technologically advanced country can’t implement one such thing? Cut down a few wars so we have money to improve domestically! Edited July 25 by coffee_rules Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TellTheTruth Posted July 25 Share Posted July 25 (edited) 20 minutes ago, coffee_rules said: Voter Fraud is fake news? But a lot of people have been caught voting wrongly. No? This is why critical thinking and logic is important. When did I say voter fraud is fake news? Edited July 25 by TellTheTruth Vicks57 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coffee_rules Posted July 25 Share Posted July 25 29 minutes ago, TellTheTruth said: This is why critical thinking and logic is important. When did I say voter fraud is fake news? Ok , now that we established that fact, I agree that it is not as widespread that it impacts elections. But, why is there a push-back to regulate voter fraud? Any effort in that direction is termed as undemocratic and disenfranchising poor black voters by liberals . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TellTheTruth Posted July 25 Share Posted July 25 33 minutes ago, coffee_rules said: Ok , now that we established that fact, I agree that it is not as widespread that it impacts elections. But, why is there a push-back to regulate voter fraud? Any effort in that direction is termed as undemocratic and disenfranchising poor black voters by liberals . Because democrats are more likely to lose votes if Id law is applied but they can't say that directly so they claim racism while Republicans on the other hand haven't been able to prove the type of voter fraud that they claim. coffee_rules 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muloghonto Posted July 26 Share Posted July 26 19 hours ago, TellTheTruth said: I'm not trying to sound rude or anything, but this post itself is loaded with very obvious logical fallacies. I'm really not sure how to proceed if you can't see that. There are no logical fallacies and stating logical fallacies incorrectly, then engaging in ad-hominem and refusal to answer the points while obfuscating is a classic liberal move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravishingravi Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 Scientific temper on full display. Joke of a country. diga and coffee_rules 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coffee_rules Posted July 28 Share Posted July 28 On 7/27/2024 at 4:06 AM, ravishingravi said: Scientific temper on full display. Joke of a country. Her scientific temper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diga Posted November 6 Share Posted November 6 On 7/28/2024 at 4:27 PM, coffee_rules said: Her scientific temper Kamala Harris laughs hysterically while envisioning a "woke" future of America. "Everybody needs to be woke." Follow: @AFpost pic.twitter.com/eS8YnmV1lr — AF Post (@AFpost) August 5, 2024 Cant imagine a future with these kind of wokes at table coffee_rules 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vvvslaxman Posted November 6 Share Posted November 6 It was dead on arrival. I told my wife she is going to cause a massive shellacking for Democrats as soon as she was picked. She did damage not just to herself also the party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diga Posted November 6 Share Posted November 6 How did she end up raising so much funds? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vvvslaxman Posted November 6 Share Posted November 6 1 hour ago, diga said: How did she end up raising so much funds? Jews. A reason why she was not openly critiquing Israel. Ironically she lost a lot of votes in rust belt from Muslims. Muslim governor openly endorsed Trump. Even Pakistanis and other Muslims were rooting for Trump. She lost a sizable Muslim votes, latino votes because of her stance on war in Israel. The funny thing Israel also prefers Trump lol even though Biden administration released record amount of money to Netanyahus administration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravishingravi Posted November 6 Share Posted November 6 2 hours ago, vvvslaxman said: It was dead on arrival. I told my wife she is going to cause a massive shellacking for Democrats as soon as she was picked. She did damage not just to herself also the party. It was not her. It was Uncle Joe. I think this was Joe's revenge to stand her up. He knew what he was doing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vvvslaxman Posted November 6 Share Posted November 6 2 minutes ago, ravishingravi said: It was not her. It was Uncle Joe. I think this was Joe's revenge to stand her up. He knew what he was doing. Not uncle Joe. Uncle Joe ran for presidency after earning popular vote in primary. Sure he became senile. Rightly dropped out once he dropped out with just 107 days to go you should try to field an electable candidate not someone who got 0 votes in primary. That was too short a period to come up with a new message especially someon3 from incumbent administration. Strategically the worst pick. She lost 12% of latino men vote. As per the analysis that clinched the deal fo4 Trump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coffee_rules Posted November 6 Share Posted November 6 (edited) 36 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: Jews. A reason why she was not openly critiquing Israel. Ironically she lost a lot of votes in rust belt from Muslims. Muslim governor openly endorsed Trump. Even Pakistanis and other Muslims were rooting for Trump. She lost a sizable Muslim votes, latino votes because of her stance on war in Israel. The funny thing Israel also prefers Trump lol even though Biden administration released record amount of money to Netanyahus administration. No, the hi-tech billionaires who hate Trump, like Soros, Bezos, Bloomberg etc. Jew thingy was a calculated risk, she ran for both sides and got burnt. https://www.cnbctv18.com/world/us-presidential-elections-meet-the-donors-financing-the-kamala-harris-campaign-19501529.htm Edited November 6 by coffee_rules Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muloghonto Posted November 6 Share Posted November 6 31 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: Jews. A reason why she was not openly critiquing Israel. Ironically she lost a lot of votes in rust belt from Muslims. Muslim governor openly endorsed Trump. Even Pakistanis and other Muslims were rooting for Trump. She lost a sizable Muslim votes, latino votes because of her stance on war in Israel. The funny thing Israel also prefers Trump lol even though Biden administration released record amount of money to Netanyahus administration. Dont make up stuff. Latinos dont give a flying toss about the war in israel. They care about illegal immigration more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts