rkt.india Posted November 2 Share Posted November 2 19 hours ago, bowl_out said: Jurel retention was clownery. Could have got him at less than half that price in the auction. They could have either let that spot unfilled or retained Buttler at that price Buttler may not have agreed to that price Link to comment
Mariyam Posted November 2 Share Posted November 2 20 hours ago, bowl_out said: Jurel retention was clownery. Could have got him at less than half that price in the auction. They could have either let that spot unfilled or retained Buttler at that price They seem to be taking a risk. If Jurel manages to displace Pant as India's short format wicketkeeper, his brand and by extension the brand of the franchise increases. One of those players who *could* have a multiplier effect. Link to comment
bowl_out Posted November 2 Share Posted November 2 47 minutes ago, Mariyam said: They seem to be taking a risk. If Jurel manages to displace Pant as India's short format wicketkeeper, his brand and by extension the brand of the franchise increases. One of those players who *could* have a multiplier effect. They already have the player who could replace Pant in White Ball cricket as their captain Jurel isn't even in the T20I squad yet Link to comment
bowl_out Posted November 2 Share Posted November 2 Venky Mysore has said that Shreyas was their first choice retention and he apparently refused. Our so called superstars think so highly of themselves. Will Shreyas really go for more than 18 cr in the auction? Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now