Vijy Posted December 29, 2024 Posted December 29, 2024 Just now, Vicks57 said: When Ann Coulter said she will not vote for him because he is Indian and hindu, this moron said she is not a racist. Now he is getting dragged for saying the same thing JD Vance said about American culture in his book and yet Vivek is the one getting dragged. Vivek being the brown man cannot criticise white culture. That is their logic. This is why you never pander to the white folks or MAGA group because you will always be a brown person. Rama is never gonna climb beyond a certain stage, probably not even to VP stage.
Muloghonto Posted January 4, 2025 Posted January 4, 2025 On 12/28/2024 at 4:56 AM, Vicks57 said: Couldn't have put it any better. Hopefully Indian Americans wake up. @coffee_rules @ravishingravi @G_B_ right wing indians like me dont vote trump due to right wing affinity with the american right wing. we do it, because it means india will be treated better as it has been under a republican potus than a democrat potus since the days of George Bush the senior, aka over 30 years. We also do it, because we identify with republican social issues more, such as hating on illegal immigration and dismanting western invented gender nonsense crap. Vicks57 1
Muloghonto Posted January 4, 2025 Posted January 4, 2025 4 minutes ago, Vicks57 said: We will see how Republican POTUS treats India. we dont have to. we already have seen from last 35 years. George Bush Snr = better for India than Clinton (Clinton is first to sanction India in a long long time) George Bush Jnr = revokes sanction & far more hostile to pakistan in weapons acquisitions. Bomb baba = far more friendly to pakistan in weapons acquisitions and far more pressing on India for social internal issues of india Trump = far more aggro on pakistan + far less interfering on Indian domestic internal issues Biden = far friendlier with pakistan + far more interfering with Indian internal issues. So we have seen for 35 years that a Republican POTUS is better for India than a democrat potus, including this potus who already has a better track record with India than his predecessor or successor democrat POTUS. And that, along with alignment on social issues like no gender ideology BS + no to illegal immigration really makes it a no brainer to vote republican. Which is why Indo-Americans are steadily shifting to republican base and republicans just won record % of Indo-American votes ever won. Proof is in the pudding as they say.
Vijy Posted January 4, 2025 Posted January 4, 2025 7 minutes ago, Muloghonto said: we dont have to. we already have seen from last 35 years. George Bush Snr = better for India than Clinton (Clinton is first to sanction India in a long long time) George Bush Jnr = revokes sanction & far more hostile to pakistan in weapons acquisitions. Bomb baba = far more friendly to pakistan in weapons acquisitions and far more pressing on India for social internal issues of india Trump = far more aggro on pakistan + far less interfering on Indian domestic internal issues Biden = far friendlier with pakistan + far more interfering with Indian internal issues. So we have seen for 35 years that a Republican POTUS is better for India than a democrat potus, including this potus who already has a better track record with India than his predecessor or successor democrat POTUS. And that, along with alignment on social issues like no gender ideology BS + no to illegal immigration really makes it a no brainer to vote republican. Which is why Indo-Americans are steadily shifting to republican base and republicans just won record % of Indo-American votes ever won. Proof is in the pudding as they say. In the treacle pudding. Muloghonto and ravishingravi 2
diga Posted January 8, 2025 Posted January 8, 2025 Key point he mentioned is about "fact checkers themselves being biased " .... We can see that in India where Zubair & his ilk masquerading as fact checkers steer the discourse in the direction they intend to
Tillu Posted January 8, 2025 Posted January 8, 2025 How serious is Trump when he says, he wants to annex Greenland, Canada, The Panama Canal and rename the Gulf of Mexico to The gulf of America. Is he just trying to be provocative or really serious. Vicks57 1
zen Posted January 8, 2025 Posted January 8, 2025 (edited) 8 hours ago, Tillu said: How serious is Trump when he says, he wants to annex Greenland, Canada, The Panama Canal and rename the Gulf of Mexico to The gulf of America. Is he just trying to be provocative or really serious. If those regions are “annexed” with the US, it will have new borders and then the “new” neighbour will need to be “annexed”. And then another new neighbour, till the whole (or the best part of the) world is “annexed”. At this point, not many take such statements seriously apart from many “ MAJER” folks, white fools, etc. (MAJERs likely clap for it because they want Modi to annex Pak, BD, Nepal, SL, etc. but India can’t do that so they let their hopes and imaginations, while stating at a PC at the dimly lit back office, play out through Trump’s statements). Edited January 8, 2025 by zen Tillu 1
mishra Posted January 8, 2025 Posted January 8, 2025 (edited) 8 hours ago, Tillu said: How serious is Trump when he says, he wants to annex Greenland, Canada, The Panama Canal and rename the Gulf of Mexico to The gulf of America. Is he just trying to be provocative or really serious. That means he wants something from Panama , Canada and Denmark. Probaly 10% of what he is saying in media. Its called "initiation of negotiation for achieving that 10%" Edited January 8, 2025 by mishra Muloghonto, Tillu and BacktoCricaddict 3
BacktoCricaddict Posted January 8, 2025 Posted January 8, 2025 30 minutes ago, mishra said: That means he wants something from Panama , Canada and Denmark. Probaly 10% of what he is saying in media. Its called "initiation of negotiation for achieving that 10%" Posturing. mishra and Muloghonto 2
Muloghonto Posted January 8, 2025 Posted January 8, 2025 1 hour ago, mishra said: That means he wants something from Panama , Canada and Denmark. Probaly 10% of what he is saying in media. Its called "initiation of negotiation for achieving that 10%" Trump is pretty transparent as to what he wants from these countries : spend more on defence and security and match murricas budget % for defence spending. He's been on this naara since 2014.
G_B_ Posted January 8, 2025 Posted January 8, 2025 Greenland to be fair makes a lot of sense. EU as usual will miss the boat ravishingravi 1
ravishingravi Posted January 9, 2025 Author Posted January 9, 2025 On 1/9/2025 at 12:45 AM, G_B_ said: Greenland to be fair makes a lot of sense. EU as usual will miss the boat Question I ask myself is where is Trump getting these ideas from. No one on the other side even remotely takes up issues he does.
coffee_rules Posted January 10, 2025 Posted January 10, 2025 Absolute cinema (stole the phrase ) mishra and ravishingravi 2
coffee_rules Posted January 20, 2025 Posted January 20, 2025 1 hour ago, ravishingravi said: Today is the day. ravishingravi 1
ravishingravi Posted January 20, 2025 Author Posted January 20, 2025 Biden gives a pardon to Fauci in advance. What a country.
Recommended Posts