Jump to content

Devdutt Paddikal is worst pick in test matches similar to SKY's selection v Aus last year


Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Lord said:

 

so one Ranji season is enough? 

He got into India A side in form with those multiple hundreds, brought momentum. Then did well for India A earlier this year, got into England game. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Vickydev said:

He got into India A side in form with those multiple hundreds, brought momentum. Then did well for India A earlier this year, got into England game. 

 

Many guys get multiple hundreds in a season. Why was he preferred over them?

 

Sarfaraz had to wait 3 years averaging 80+ each season before callup. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Lord said:

 

Many guys get multiple hundreds in a season. Why was he preferred over them?

 

Sarfaraz had to wait 3 years averaging 80+ each season before callup. 

Just good timing bro. Too many injuries/missing players leading into England series, meant India A players like Sarfu, Jurel, Patidar moved to main team. He was scoring big runs at the time so got promoted to A team. 

 

Ab itna hi pata hai bhai.. Aur sawaal mat pucch:pray:

 

 

Posted
54 minutes ago, Trichromatic said:

Paddikal averages 29 in FC season, got selected in tour.

 

Jadeja averages 30 in last 10 games and got dropped even though he can bowl also.

 

Jadeja drop was not smart. He is as much a reliable bat last 5 years as any other on display except Pant.

 

I think he will play some tests this series. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Vickydev said:

Just good timing bro. Too many injuries/missing players leading into England series, meant India A players like Sarfu, Jurel, Patidar moved to main team. He was scoring big runs at the time so got promoted to A team. 

 

Ab itna hi pata hai bhai.. Aur sawaal mat pucch:pray:

 

 

 

not asking you, but don't justify a wrong selection. One look at his technique tells you he isn't suited for Test cricket. Need to reward the actual potential guys or those who make runs season after season

Posted

If ruturaj somehow managed a 50 in the A games, he would have played too

 

Someone in the backend are slipping these mediocre FC players into the A tours, to boost their brand value. So if they make a decent score by accident, they'll get the test cap 

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, Lord said:

 

Welcome back. Hope all good.

Thank you, all good.I just had to take a break from cricket after that sh*t show against NZ. 

Edited by putrevus
Posted

Shouldn't have played ahead of Easwaran at no. 3. Easwaran is way more compact. 

Paddikal went in at no. 6 in A games and did just a little better bar one innings.

Posted

When you had an opener in the squad, why get this guy who was not even in the squad to open.

 

Again all this reshuffle done to fit KL Rahul ? There was no need to drop Sarfraz either.

 

 

Posted

Players who deserved to play ahead of Paddikal:

 

Easwaran (on principle. I would say Paddikal seems more talented than him but he earned a chance)

 

Sai Sudarshan- has a lot more upside as a future talent 

 

Sarfaraz- much better red ball batsman and has more range and better temperament 

 

Jadeja- better bat and fielder and world class spinner

 

Ashwin- better bat and world class spinner

 

 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...