Grooming gangs back in news

[Chaos]

2 hours ago, Alam_dar said:

 

Dear @Chaos

 

I am sorry to hear about this poor girl. I hope she gets justice and hopefully all such criminals get their punishments, and the left-wing learn its lesson about Muslim immigrants and their non-integration in the society. 

 

Why would they integrate them? So it can become a radicalized nation like urs? No ty!

[Alam_dar]

7 hours ago, Muloghonto said:

Left wing takes lessons on economics and morality from a deadbeat dad. So there is no hope that the left will see reason on anything when their entire basis of existence is irrational deadbeat daddy copes against society. 

 

Despite shortcomings, the left is trillions of times better than HATE spewing right, which has absolutely no morality, but only self interests and the might is right rule. 

[Alam_dar]

7 hours ago, Chaos said:

Why would they integrate them? So it can become a radicalized nation like urs? No ty!

 

Because they are also humans. It was not their fault that they were born in Muslim families and thus indoctrinated, just like fanatic right wing Hindus or right wing Trump Christians are indoctrinated.

If you think your Hindu gods created the universe and then let these people born in Muslim families, then your gods becomes criminal. 

 

 

Edited January 11, 2025 by Alam_dar

[Chaos]

3 hours ago, Alam_dar said:

 

Because they are also humans. It was not their fault that they were born in Muslim families and thus indoctrinated, just like fanatic right wing Hindus or right wing Trump Christians are indoctrinated.

If you think your Hindu gods created the universe and then let these people born in Muslim families, then your gods becomes criminal. 

 

 

Most of the indian muslims are not radicalized like other nation ones. Especially not like pook and other terrorist sponsoring nations

Edited January 11, 2025 by Chaos

[coffee_rules]

6 hours ago, Alam_dar said:

 

Despite shortcomings, the left is trillions of times better than HATE spewing right, which has absolutely no morality, but only self interests and the might is right rule. 

Leftists spew their hatred for the  majority community and molly cuddle the minorities , won’t allow them to integrate and cause issues like radicalism and growing illegal immigrants, they play Nannies to everybody . Most of the world’s revolutions and deaths are caused by leftists. 

Edited January 11, 2025 by coffee_rules

[Muloghonto]

6 hours ago, Alam_dar said:

 

Despite shortcomings, the left is trillions of times better than HATE spewing right, which has absolutely no morality, but only self interests and the might is right rule. 

Yes that is why the left has a higher bosy count than the right since the existence of the left. Makes sense. 

 

[BacktoCricaddict]

1 hour ago, coffee_rules said:

Leftists spew their hatred for the  majority community and molly cuddle the minorities , won’t allow them to integrate and cause issues like radicalism and growing illegal immigrants, they play Nannie’s to everybody . Most of the world’s revolutions and deaths are caused by leftists. 

The modern left has completely bastardized classical liberalism 

[Muloghonto]

4 minutes ago, BacktoCricaddict said:

The modern left has completely bastardized classical liberalism 

As well as leftism. Coz the modern leftist believes in self identification. Try saying to the bolsheviks ' sorry I ain't bourgeoisie, I identify as proleteriat'  or ' I identify as non binary'.

You will be shot first because Marxism structurally breaks down if people get to choose their identity. 

[Alam_dar]

6 hours ago, Muloghonto said:

Yes that is why the left has a higher bosy count than the right since the existence of the left. Makes sense. 

 

 

What are you talking???? How can you even imagine comparing these two. The religious and nationalist fascist right is millions of times worse than the secular left. 

 

The right was leading the world during the whole human history and it spread bloodshed everywhere. Even your so-claimed SUPERIOR Hindu society was spreading blood everywhere where Hindu Rajas were fighting against each other. 

 

Hitler was a right wing ultra-national leader who killed millions. 

 

The left wing got some power only during the last century after the 2nd world war, and it was the only period when the Western Europe saw no major war during the last several decades. 

 

Only the secular left wing has the potential to integrate people without force and bloodshed. Only under it we saw that European countries merged into a Union. While the counter picture is of the right is where Trump is threatening Canada and Greenland and want to invade it. 

 

 

[Muloghonto]

32 minutes ago, Alam_dar said:

 

What are you talking???? How can you even imagine comparing these two. The religious and nationalist fascist right is millions of times worse than the secular left. 

 

The right was leading the world during the whole human history and it spread bloodshed everywhere. Even your so-claimed SUPERIOR Hindu society was spreading blood everywhere where Hindu Rajas were fighting against each other. 

First off, we can only compare leftism with rightism for effect directly over the duation both have existed as political entities in power - which means, from early 1900s or so.

In that time period, EVEN IF YOU COUNT HITLER AS RIGHT WING ( which he isnt technically, since he is nationalist socialism, which is hybrid fo right and left and can be attributed to BOTH), left wing body count >> right wing body count, coz left wing has Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and several others who's numbers overshadow the heck outta Al Qaeda+Taliban+such. 

 

And if we compare left wing violence to right wing violence IN INDIA, it again, is no contest, as naxalites+maoists+ulfa leftists far far outnumber the body count anywhere in India that is product of right wing violence outside of direct war over Kashmir.

Especially if you compare it with dharmic right wing, then the left wing wins by a countrymile as the more violent entity.

Hindu rajas fighting against each other isnt right-wing war any more than Julius Caesar going 'thank you mars for my victory' is a right wing war for conquest of gaul or George Bush thanking god for iraq being right wing war over iraq, you dumb gobshyte.

Right wing wars is when wars are waged ON THE BASIS OF RELIGION.

Aka crusades, jihads, inquisitions, fitnaa, etc.

Notice how ALL of them are facking degenerate abrahamism wars of religion and not pagan, because pagans very very rarely - and in many regions never- used religion as a casus belli for war.

Just about the only time you see Roman empire saying 'god wills it, lets go kill those feckers there coz god commands it' is in its Christian Byzantine period and not once ever in its Pagan period - obviously they are gonna host festivitieis in name of host of gods when they win, like any normal secularist society does to this day, but that doesnt make any of the wars of pagan India or pagan rome or such as wars of religion, aka right wing body count.

 

" GIB Land, else i TAKE your land and if i succeed, i go get pissed drunk and give offerings to mars/maa durga/Buddha/Apollo, etc,;  does not make it a right wing fundie war of religion you disingeneous retarded leftoid.

"God/Gods will it, lets go wage war and kill feckers coz their god/gods are dumb and we r better' **IS** the benchmark of religious right wing fundie war. Are pagans at 0.00% for them ? No, but they are at 0.5% of them in history of species homo sapiens so its such a rarity that it doesnt even deserve discussion.

 

Edited January 11, 2025 by Muloghonto

[Alam_dar]

3 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

In that time period, EVEN IF YOU COUNT HITLER AS RIGHT WING ( which he isnt technically, since he is nationalist socialism, which is hybrid fo right and left and can be attributed to BOTH), left wing body count >> right wing body count, coz left wing has Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and several others who's numbers overshadow the heck outta Al Qaeda+Taliban+such. 

 

What have Stalin and Mao to do with the SECULAR Left Wing? Are you intentionally mixing things to confuse others (the dirty Tactics)? 

 

And what have al-Qaeda and Taliban have to do with the SECULAR Left Wing? They are religious nuts just like Hindutva or Christian or Jewish religous fanatics. 

 

7 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

Right wing wars is when wars are waged ON THE BASIS OF RELIGION.

 

No, the right wing is, Even TODAY, consists of both, i.e. religious fanaticism and also ultranationalism fanaticism (Fascists). Both of them have nothing to do with SECULARISM. 

 

9 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

because pagans very very rarely - and in many regions never- used religion as a casus belli for war.

 

It doesn't reduce the bloodshed by Hindu Rajas for their personal gains, and cannot be compared to the present day SECULAR Left wing in Europe. 

 

And the present day Secular Left Wing also fought no wars over religion, but there is complete religious freedom. If you blame the Iraq war on SECULAR Left Wing, then you are making an intentional mistake. Iraq war was making yourself safe against right wing Islamic ideology and ultranationalism of Saddam Hussain. Hindu kings also fought such wars against Muslims rulers. Do you then also want to blame those Hindu kings for the bloodshed? Or Israel is fighting it in Gaza by bombing it. Do you blame it on Israel? I see it as a continuation of your dirty Tactics. 

 

 

[diga]

Was Mao Zedong or Stalin responsible for more deaths than Hitler? 

[ravishingravi]

20 minutes ago, diga said:

Was Mao Zedong or Stalin responsible for more deaths than Hitler? 

 

It's tough tough competition. 

[ravishingravi]

 

[ravishingravi]

 

[cowboysfan]

the irony is not lost on me.British used muslims all around the world to do their dirty work for centuries and redrew their territory with untenable maps and created countries which will not survive and now their own country is going to be taken over Jihadis from another country they created.I hope Indians in UK get out of that hellhole before its too late.

[diga]

43 minutes ago, cowboysfan said:

the irony is not lost on me.British used muslims all around the world to do their dirty work for centuries and redrew their territory with untenable maps and created countries which will not survive and now their own country is going to be taken over Jihadis from another country they created.I hope Indians in UK get out of that hellhole before its too late.

Only solace is they have a bigger island in Australia 

[Muloghonto]

16 hours ago, Alam_dar said:

 

What have Stalin and Mao to do with the SECULAR Left Wing? Are you intentionally mixing things to confuse others (the dirty Tactics)? 

Because Stalin and mao promoted secularism. Duh. 

16 hours ago, Alam_dar said:

And what have al-Qaeda and Taliban have to do with the SECULAR Left Wing? They are religious nuts just like Hindutva or Christian or Jewish religous fanatics. 

Given that Al qaeda mass murders for their ideology, they are more in common with leftists than hinduvta. 

16 hours ago, Alam_dar said:

 

No, the right wing is, Even TODAY, consists of both, i.e. religious fanaticism and also ultranationalism fanaticism (Fascists). Both of them have nothing to do with SECULARISM. 

Secularism is compatible with nationalism, dumbass. One can be a nationalist and a secularists at the same time, I suggest you read definitions before spouting nonsense. 

16 hours ago, Alam_dar said:

 

It doesn't reduce the bloodshed by Hindu Rajas for their personal gains, and cannot be compared to the present day SECULAR Left wing in Europe. 

They can. Coz they didn't go kill nearly as many civilians as Secular Left Wing in Europe today and it's wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and supporting nazis of ukraine today. 

16 hours ago, Alam_dar said:

 

And the present day Secular Left Wing also fought no wars over religion, but there is complete religious freedom. If you blame the Iraq war on SECULAR Left Wing, then you are making an intentional mistake. Iraq war was making yourself safe against right wing Islamic ideology and ultranationalism of Saddam Hussain. Hindu kings also fought such wars against Muslims rulers. Do you then also want to blame those Hindu kings for the bloodshed? Or Israel is fighting it in Gaza by bombing it. Do you blame it on Israel? I see it as a continuation of your dirty Tactics. 

 

 

Saddam was a baathist, dumbass. The closest thing to secularism in the Arab world. Saddam bombed islamists when secular leftards of Europe were promoting them.

 

Hindu kings fought zero wars in history on the basis of religion. Which Hindu king fought which islamist on basis of religion,which war ? Answer: none.

 

It still doesn't change the fact that leftists = responsible for more bloodshed in the world and in India than hinduvta is. Numbers are decisive, follower of inferior immoral European ideology.

[Alam_dar]

34 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

Because Stalin and mao promoted secularism. Duh. 

 

Are you out of your mind?

• True secularism ensures freedom of religion and the separation of religion from state affairs.
• Stalin and Mao promoted state atheism, not secularism in the liberal democratic sense.
• Their regimes actively suppressed religion to maintain ideological and political control, reflecting authoritarian policies rather than genuine secular ideals.
• Both Stalin and Mao were ultranationalists and they behaved purely like how Trump or Modi behave today. 

35 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

Given that Al qaeda mass murders for their ideology, they are more in common with leftists than hinduvta. 

 

Yes, you are indeed out of your mind. 

 

36 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

Secularism is compatible with nationalism, dumbass.

 

 

Secularism is only compatible with nationalism, but absolutely not with ultranationalism or fascism. Both of these features are only found in the right wing. Trump and Modi are the clear examples today of both ultranationalism and fascism. 

 

45 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

They can. Coz they didn't go kill nearly as many civilians as Secular Left Wing in Europe today and it's wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and supporting nazis of ukraine today. 

 

How did Secular left of Europe killed more people than the right wing Hitler and Stalin and Mao? 

And are you really supporting Taliban in Afghanistan too after supporting Saddam Hussain in Iraq? 

 

And your support for a dictator like Putin is mind-blowing. Even the majority of the Republican Party does not support the dictator Putin, who ultimately supported the dictators in Syria and Iran. 

 

51 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

Saddam was a baathist, dumbass. The closest thing to secularism in the Arab world. Saddam bombed islamists when secular leftards of Europe were promoting them.

 

Baathism has nothing to do with the Western Secular system. Both Saddam and Assad were dictators and ultranationalists. It were mainly the right wing conservative Republican party of the US which supported Saddam Hussain. The West had to support Saddam against the more religious fanatic Iranian regime. 

 

57 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

Hindu kings fought zero wars in history on the basis of religion.

 

Are you even unable to comprehend what I write? Hind Rajas were right wing rulers, who were fighting and killing each other for their own personal interests. 

And it may be that killing didn't happen in India for spreading Hindism, while Brahmins were not DIRECTLY ruling Hindu states. Brahmins were not the RULERS, but it were Khastaries who were the fighters in Indian system. And Hindu Khastaries fought each others for personal interests.

 

1 hour ago, Muloghonto said:

Which Hindu king fought which islamist on basis of religion,which war ? Answer: none.

 

Don't you know the fight about the Somnath Mandir, where Raja Bhoja of the Paramara dynasty (allied with Raja Bhimadeva I of the Chaulukya (Solanki) dynasty) fought Mahmoud Ghaznavi. 

 

Therefore, stop blaming the West for fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan for self-defence against Islamic terrorists. 

 

 

 

 

 

[Muloghonto]

4 minutes ago, Alam_dar said:

 

Are you out of your mind?

• True secularism ensures freedom of religion and the separation of religion from state affairs.
• Stalin and Mao promoted state atheism, not secularism in the liberal democratic sense.
• Their regimes actively suppressed religion to maintain ideological and political control, reflecting authoritarian policies rather than genuine secular ideals.
• Both Stalin and Mao were ultranationalists and they behaved purely like how Trump or Modi behave today. 

They were ultranationalist lefties who were secularist and separated church from state. So wtf are u on about when both of them wrote on secularism as ideal of communism and implemented it. 

4 minutes ago, Alam_dar said:

Yes, you are indeed out of your mind. 

 

 

 

Secularism is only compatible with nationalism, but absolutely not with ultranationalism or fascism. Both of these features are only found in the right wing. Trump and Modi are the clear examples today of both ultranationalism and fascism. 

False. I can separate church and state and still be hyper nationalist.  Modi is less fascist than any liberal or leftist in Europe given that Europe takes fascist measures to stop protests and Modi does not. 

Yet another example of hinduvta being superior to western ideologies. 

4 minutes ago, Alam_dar said:

 

How did Secular left of Europe killed more people than the right wing Hitler and Stalin and Mao? 

And are you really supporting Taliban in Afghanistan too after supporting Saddam Hussain in Iraq? 

Stalin and mao were left wing not right wing, leftist liar. Commies are left wing. Who have a higher body count than the right wing. 

Saddam was a leftist as he was baathist  secularist. 

Lying wont work, lefotid liar. 

4 minutes ago, Alam_dar said:

And your support for a dictator like Putin is mind-blowing. Even the majority of the Republican Party does not support the dictator Putin, who ultimately supported the dictators in Syria and Iran. 

 

Putin didn't come into my parliament and honour an actual ww2 nazi. Zelensky and western liberals did. So they are worse than putin. Simple. 

4 minutes ago, Alam_dar said:

Baathism has nothing to do with the Western Secular system. Both Saddam and Assad were dictators and ultranationalists. It were mainly the right wing conservative Republican party of the US which supported Saddam Hussain. The West had to support Saddam against the more religious fanatic Iranian regime. 

Bathism  is literally secularism of separation of church and state.

Your idiotic brain made the idiotic mistake of thinking you cannot be a nationalist who separates church and state. When u most definitely can. 

4 minutes ago, Alam_dar said:

 

Are you even unable to comprehend what I write? Hind Rajas were right wing rulers, who were fighting and killing each other for their own personal interests. 

And it may be that killing didn't happen in India for spreading Hindism, while Brahmins were not DIRECTLY ruling Hindu states. Brahmins were not the RULERS, but it were Khastaries who were the fighters in Indian system. And Hindu Khastaries fought each others for personal interests.

Yes. Personal reasons. Not ideological reasons. So the ideologies who have people wage war for ideological reasons are more violent and inferior ideologies to those that don't. Therefore Hinduism is morally superior to leftism or liberalism as it's not spread by force like these are. 

4 minutes ago, Alam_dar said:

 

Don't you know the fight about the Somnath Mandir, where Raja Bhoja of the Paramara dynasty (allied with Raja Bhimadeva I of the Chaulukya (Solanki) dynasty) fought Mahmoud Ghaznavi. 

And what part of defensive alliance makes it an automatic war of religion??

I guess then uk waged religious war in Iraq by that benchmark. 

4 minutes ago, Alam_dar said:

Therefore, stop blaming the West for fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan for self-defence against Islamic terrorists. 

 

It's not self defence when u invade other countries who didn't attack u. It's inferiorminded barbaric aggression, which makes liberalism and leftism inferior to asian ideologies. 

 

Maybe thats why we asian pagans are superior in moral code and every benchmark to western liberals in their own country.