Virat Kohli, Rohit Sharma to 'not retire on their own' as BCCI hell-bent to solve dilemma after Pathan, Gavaskar's rant

[rollingstoned]

3 minutes ago, Adamant said:

Rogers was class, there were talks all over Aussie forum about why he wasn't picked earlier.

 

Quite an unusual take from rollingstoned.

 

 

 

11 hours ago, sensible-indian said:

The opener right?

 

Harsh take bro.

 

He played a crucial role when Australia was struggling to find good openers.

 

Got his chance too late.

 

Did well with whatever chances he got and retired.

 

Good cricketer.

 

Just checked..

 

42 average as a opener. Good stuff.

Was in response to katich saying journeyman 37 yr olds have no place at the top of the order in tests. Even if they may be good the argument can always be made that it is better to invest in someone younger who can be your incumbent for a decade or more. 

[AKane]

My problem with this article is the title.  What is being said is reasonable so why is it referred to as "rant"? Nobody is ranting.

 

Why is Gambhir's statement not criticized in similar manner?