Jump to content

Bangladeshi crowd uses hinduphobic slur against liton das during BPL


Recommended Posts

On 1/21/2025 at 11:23 AM, Sean Bradley said:

 

Well agree that Jai Shree Ram and Allahu Akbar chants are an indirect persecutions, but are persecutions nevertheless, our lots or even Greenbros for that matter are a little sophisticated, but Bangladeshi's are a different level of 3rd grades. So anything coming from that lot should be taken with a pinch of salt. 

This is the problem with Hindus ie if you are one. Let's equate jai shree ram with something that's universally associated with terrorism.

 

Why not equate it will hallelujah ??? 

 

 

Link to comment
32 minutes ago, jf1gp_1 said:

This is the problem with Hindus ie if you are one. Let's equate jai shree ram with something that's universally associated with terrorism.

 

Why not equate it will hallelujah ??? 

 

 

 

 

 

In the modern times Hindu/Indian Leftists are much bigger enemies of Hindus than anybody else. They falsely equate Islamic Supermacist terrorism to Hindu's natural Conservatism. Give the impression to the rest of the world that Hindus are equally violent and radicalized as the Islamists. They don't just stop there, as they also act as an apologist for Islamist violence against Hindus and sweep it under the carpet. 

 

A large part of racism you see against India today stems from falsehood spread by the Indian Leftists regarding Hinduism and Hindutva over decades..

 

 

 

 

Link to comment

Note that Liton hasn't been picked for the CT despite being one of BD's few matchwinners. Soumya is the quota pick because anyway he won't be in the XI. 

 

Liton especially faces lot of hate in SM because he is popular among BD girls. Rokibuls don't like that one bit, hence such an easy target even when he makes normal posts, never political ones. 

 

If you are following news, Yunus government is firing all Hindu/Chakma govt employees, a purge like nothing else. Genocide is imminent, yet you see our libbus make false equivalence between India/Hindus and neighbors. 

Edited by Gollum
Link to comment
On 1/23/2025 at 3:41 PM, lemsip said:

It was happening at the oval in the WTC final. I was in the ground and there was a group near me who were shouting it at both Siraj and shami whenever they would move near the boundary. Indian crowds have a long history of abuse towards foreign black players as well. It is usually the language barrier that prevents it from being more widely picked up 

Next time, please record such stuff and post here. 

 

I have been to plenty of India games and Shami/Siraj are well liked by the spectators. Only Indian player who has faced heat from our crowds in recent times is Hardik Pandya. Heck 2 decades back, Sachin was booed in his home ground. Never seen any Indian player targetted because of caste/religion, not even Azhar.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Gollum said:

Next time, please record such stuff and post here. 

 

Will try when I watch one of the tests in England this summer.

The emergence of a loud, hyper religious Indian watching public in grounds abroad is a relatively recent phenomenon. In the past the Indians in the crowd used to be well behaved and clearly well educated. Now most of them are celebrity watchers or hyper nationalistic/regious nuts and as drink is available freely unlike on Indian grounds, it doesn't take very much for them to lose their inhibitions.

Pakistani crowds in the UK have always been that way. I remember the India v Pakistan game in manchester in the 2019 world cup where I felt uneasy when the group next to me started on "takbeer, allahu akbar" etc etc but kind of expected from a crowd largely comprised of taxi drivers and takeaway shop owners.

Edited by lemsip
Link to comment
1 hour ago, lemsip said:

Will try when I watch one of the tests in England this summer.

The emergence of a loud, hyper religious Indian watching public in grounds abroad is a relatively recent phenomenon. In the past the Indians in the crowd used to be well behaved and clearly well educated. Now most of them are celebrity watchers or hyper nationalistic/regious nuts and as drink is available freely unlike on Indian grounds, it doesn't take very much for them to lose their inhibitions.

Pakistani crowds in the UK have always been that way. I remember the India v Pakistan game in manchester in the 2019 world cup where I felt uneasy when the group next to me started on "takbeer, allahu akbar" etc etc but kind of expected from a crowd largely comprised of taxi drivers and takeaway shop owners.

Balderash. You could have heard 'Ganpati bappa morya' chants in both Sharjah and multiple games in the late 90s and early 00s in India. Has nothing to do with 'hyper nationalism/religious nuts' other than what self-styled secular/'progressive' cultists who feel the compulsion to do 'sem2sem' keep hallucinating. 

Link to comment
5 minutes ago, rollingstoned said:

Balderash. You could have heard 'Ganpati bappa morya' chants in both Sharjah and multiple games in the late 90s and early 00s in India. Has nothing to do with 'hyper nationalism/religious nuts' other than what self-styled secular/'progressive' cultists who feel the compulsion to do 'sem2sem' keep hallucinating. 

Another keyboard warrior who cannot read but has a ready copy and pasted set of insults ready to be used without any ability to understand. I clearly said there  were chants directed only at Siraj and shami, the only two Muslim in their own team, in order to rile them. I was at the ground and you clearly weren't. That's not generic chants by an Indian supporting crowd ( likely drunk) which are not directed at a specific player like in your example. Ganpati bappa etc have always been there.

Link to comment
54 minutes ago, lemsip said:

Another keyboard warrior who cannot read but has a ready copy and pasted set of insults ready to be used without any ability to understand. I clearly said there  were chants directed only at Siraj and shami, the only two Muslim in their own team, in order to rile them. I was at the ground and you clearly weren't. That's not generic chants by an Indian supporting crowd ( likely drunk) which are not directed at a specific player like in your example. Ganpati bappa etc have always been there.

Lol, I'm not the 'keyboard warrior' who can't read here, you're the pathetic sod who tried to move the goalposts and pretend you said something but ackshually meant something else but then attempted to deflect it by accusing the one who pointed this out as someone using 'insults' because you tried hiding behind some moral panic to appear holier than thou. Bolded part especially.

I ignored the cringe attempt to class-signal btw which gave you away as an ignorant rube more than anything else. 

 

 

1 hour ago, rollingstoned said:

The emergence of a loud, hyper religious Indian watching public in grounds abroad is a relatively recent phenomenon. In the past the Indians in the crowd used to be well behaved and clearly well educated. Now most of them are celebrity watchers or hyper nationalistic/regious nuts and as drink is available freely unlike on Indian grounds, it doesn't take very much for them to lose their inhibitions.

It would've created a lot more fuss in the current climate when people are looking to jump on even fake incidents so I'll take it with a sack of salt. Rohit sharma was asked specifically about it in the post-match presser and he didn't know the first thing about it. 

 

 

Link to comment
On 1/25/2025 at 3:05 PM, rollingstoned said:

Balderash. You could have heard 'Ganpati bappa morya' chants in both Sharjah and multiple games in the late 90s and early 00s in India. Has nothing to do with 'hyper nationalism/religious nuts' other than what self-styled secular/'progressive' cultists who feel the compulsion to do 'sem2sem' keep hallucinating. 

I always love right wing bigots. They always and always post the absolute vile hatred for a religion online.  And when we show real examples of that happening they deny these things are happening.

 

You can see social media discourse changing over the recent years and vilest hate posts. 

 

The same people who post the vilest of things targeting muslims online then want us to believe the exact same thing is not happening in real ground. 

 

It's the weirdest double speak I have ever seen. What is the difference between what you guys post here and some person chanting on the ground? Do the right wing bigots here not go to watch matches? 

Link to comment
On 1/25/2025 at 3:18 PM, lemsip said:

Another keyboard warrior who cannot read but has a ready copy and pasted set of insults ready to be used without any ability to understand. I clearly said there  were chants directed only at Siraj and shami, the only two Muslim in their own team, in order to rile them. I was at the ground and you clearly weren't. That's not generic chants by an Indian supporting crowd ( likely drunk) which are not directed at a specific player like in your example. Ganpati bappa etc have always been there.

I don't understand the weird logic these guys have

 

1) these guys clearly spread hatred of Muslim online in their posts.

 

2) then they deny these things are happening on the ground and try to downplay

 

There are only two options here 

 

A) They think their opinions are so evil they can only be posted online and it's bad if it's at the ground. Otherwise why would they deny these things and pretend it's a bad thing to happen online? They say the exact same thing on this forum. 

 

B) they are just cowards who cannot own up despite doing the same things online. So they lie and hide as they feel shame about their own opinions if it's expressed at the ground. So online is fine for them but not openly ok the ground. 

 

They cannot post something online and then claim it's a bad thing if it happens on the ground.

 

If their opinions are correct then what's wrong with chanting same on the ground? If it's too shameful to chant on the ground, why post it online?

Link to comment
33 minutes ago, New guy said:

I always love right wing bigots. They always and always post the absolute vile hatred for a religion online.  And when we show real examples of that happening they deny these things are happening.

 

You can see social media discourse changing over the recent years and vilest hate posts. 

 

The same people who post the vilest of things targeting muslims online then want us to believe the exact same thing is not happening in real ground. 

 

It's the weirdest double speak I have ever seen. What is the difference between what you guys post here and some person chanting on the ground? Do the right wing bigots here not go to watch matches? 

Love how libtard/sickular dumb*s engage in whataboutery and false equivalence about things they don't know the first thing about yet feel the need to display a weird pompous zeal  so they can feel better about themselves by calling others 'bigots' and 'fascists'. Those words have been rendered meaningless anyway by sheer dint of overuse and abuse. It requires a complete inability to even do a proper root cause analysis to determine whether there actually is bigotry. Love also how we are supposed to assume that these examples are genuine just cos they want it to be true and so it can prove some weird narrative that they've bought into hooked and have psyched themselves is true because they want to believe it when the captain himself said he was unaware of such a thing and then all we have is 'trust me vro, intolerance has gone up yo'. 

 

And yes this same 'online discourse' managed to convince soft brained idealistic imbeciles like this fellow that somehow Jsr was some communal war cry which is the exact same as a genuine call for jihad in Allahu Akbar by repeatedly concocting such instances by a section of the media which only exists to both reinforce and feed this conformation bias by manufacturing them out of thin air. There are over a dozen of these from memory the last decade yet the myth refuses to die because sem2sem is more important. 

 

If calling out extreme bigotry in Islam and it's followers is bigotry because they don't even see non-Muslims as humans then so be it. We have very different definitions of it and you only probably believe this due to an unhealthy desire to appear politically correct and empathetic. Or are probably just that dumb and can't exhibit any nuanced thinking absent of binaries which for most liberals is perfectly on brand.

 

I assume you know the difference between action and reaction, that is the difference. The difference is the 'hate' you see against them wouldn't exist if they didn't start it themselves and then instead of taking responsibility for it resort to dishonest whataboutery and all sorts of evasion and gaslighting. I don't blame them actually, I blame HINOs and dhimmis like you for making excuses for them and giving them cover fire and refusing to either educate yourselves let alone learn from history. When secular cultists get culled by them anyway - which is a matter of when, not if usually - it's hard to sympathise with them. Small price to pay for a wider awakening and for a greater bunch to snap out of their own delusional reverie. 

Edited by rollingstoned
Link to comment
25 minutes ago, New guy said:

I don't understand the weird logic these guys have

 

1) these guys clearly spread hatred of Muslim online in their posts.

 

2) then they deny these things are happening on the ground and try to downplay

 

There are only two options here 

 

A) They think their opinions are so evil they can only be posted online and it's bad if it's at the ground. Otherwise why would they deny these things and pretend it's a bad thing to happen online? They say the exact same thing on this forum. 

 

B) they are just cowards who cannot own up despite doing the same things online. So they lie and hide as they feel shame about their own opinions if it's expressed at the ground. So online is fine for them but not openly ok the ground. 

 

They cannot post something online and then claim it's a bad thing if it happens on the ground.

 

If their opinions are correct then what's wrong with chanting same on the ground? If it's too shameful to chant on the ground, why post it online?

 In this case it's neither bad online nor on the ground. It's not like we have incontrovertible proof that it happened or that it was meant to provoke them, it helps us spin a larger narrative around it if we assume that it did in the interest of false equivalence tho. There's more where that came from after all. 

 

Besides im sure everything you tell everyone online in any medium is exactly what you would tell them In person. If you met kohli tomorrow somewhere im sure you would tell him exactly what you say here on the forum with no loss in translation of embellishment at all. Not sure what new weird childish logic is this. People always have more filters In person than online especially with more relative anonymity. 

Edited by rollingstoned
Link to comment
On 1/21/2025 at 12:51 AM, Teengunalagaan said:

Damn!! What a region to be in.

 

NZ you lucky SOB

 

 

 

On 1/22/2025 at 6:40 AM, rish said:

What a destiny India has to be placed next to such shitty neighbors

 

I mean neighbors generally don't like each other - usually hate each other.

 

Look at the Ukies and Russians, neither Germany nor Russia like Poland and vice versa, Scotland/Ireland vs England, China and Korea aren't thrilled about the Japanese even with the sea separating them etc......Lets not even look at African countries.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, New guy said:

I always love right wing bigots. They always and always post the absolute vile hatred for a religion online.  And when we show real examples of that happening they deny these things are happening.

 

You can see social media discourse changing over the recent years and vilest hate posts. 

 

 

I am not active on SM except for few cricket pages.

But I have real world experience of travelling to Oman, HongKong, Dubai, Singapore & Brussels and Massachusettes

 

I have met real people who do business with us, and during drinks many times the topic has come up where people said that earlier Indians don't used to assimilate with the native society and always lived separate. They struggle in English etc etc.

 

But now more and more Indians are engaging and are mixing up with society. Even the younger gen who moves to these countries are more confident and some of them believe that it's due to India's rise in stature globally.

 

Now I don't know, if they are in minority. But I am telling you what I have observed. Dont care about SM, where even a Abdul from Sialkot can become Antonio from Italy and spread vile.

Edited by singhvivek141
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...