Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
12 hours ago, coffee_rules said:

The things that you naively believe . Who asked them  to do that (bolded part)? This was how colonialism was justified and started in the 16th century

ahem... who? how about India?

 

Before we became self sufficent India requested food & economic aid multiple times. While US has used USAID as an instrument of foriegn policy, there are no free lunches. 

Posted
20 hours ago, New guy said:

@Vicks57look at the intelligence level of thes posters. They rave about "deep state" while supporting the richest guy in the world as unelected emperor and another billionaire as president 

 

I mean even animals have more intelligence than this, crying about deep state while supporting unelected billionaires ruling as emperors. They will be studied in history as how dumb humanity can become based on brainwashing 

*ing morons you liberals, didn’t see how Bidens, Obamas rule warmongering ways that caused the world so much harm, you keep expecting the same from this regime fear-lingering. You have nothing intelligent to say , other than calling other posters names in your echo chambers. First pay up some tax dollars and see it being spent on a trans concerts in Ukraine.  People voted for Trump just like they voted for Obama. Just facking cope!

Posted

Read this @New guy for a prospective and shift in opinion. It is not too late to accept the new world order.  
 

The 20th century liberal democratic model is going the same way as the great 20th century totalitarianisms it defined itself against. Yet — as reflected in liberal discourse where the assumption made is that politics is a binary choice between liberalism and fascism — liberals are still trapped in the 20th century, fighting ghosts, even as the world has already moved on.

 

https://unherd.com/2025/01/liberalism-wont-survive-the-year/

Posted (edited)
On 2/16/2025 at 3:16 PM, BacktoCricaddict said:

My sense is that USAID was started with the genuine intent of providing developmental assistance to people who needed it - regardless of where they were. I don't see anything wrong with that, especially in nations ravaged by war, corruption, deep poverty and no hope for people. Rich nations have an obligation to help in such situations. Moreover, global security and development is in the national interest, especially in maintaining stable cargo movement and supply-chains.

 

Where things went out of control is that they were easily swayed by all and sundry claims of victim-hood and exploitation. 

 

Now, the pendulum is swinging the other way - with guys like Musk who think that they must obliterate everything that every social program provides, instead of making honest assessments of what people need.

Bhai,

I claim to think I am decent student of geo politics considering I am not officially studying it. I have heard many lectures of CIA guys and each time I have realised one thing very clear. Where 99.9999 percent of us stop thinking, They start from there.

 

So if they are after USAID or something, May be they think they are too exposed now. ROI via USAID isnt good enough. Replace it with something else

Edited by mishra
Posted (edited)

Something sinister did happen in 2012-13... What kind of timeline were we in & we didn't even know.   Kejruddin the rat deserves hell man

 

Edited by Lone Wolf
Posted
47 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

Something sinister did happen in 2012-13... What kind of timeline were we in & we didn't even know.   Kejruddin the rat deserves hell man

 

She said she was part of WHO campaign for child mortality sponsored by USAID. It was before she joined BJP in 2003 while BJP was in power . After that UPA won two terms . If USAID funded BJP to topple UPA , they did bad investment 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, coffee_rules said:

She said she was part of WHO campaign for child mortality sponsored by USAID. It was before she joined BJP in 2003 while BJP was in power . After that UPA won two terms . If USAID funded BJP to topple UPA , they did bad investment 

One may extrapolate based on events that When Congress party signed MoU with China, I think US wanted Congress to shown its place.

Edited by mishra
Posted
6 hours ago, Lone Wolf said:

Something sinister did happen in 2012-13... What kind of timeline were we in & we didn't even know.   Kejruddin the rat deserves hell man

 

lol man you congressis lost it man. Ambanis gained all the wealth during congress and you are saying he is a deep state asset. Ambani doesn’t even do business in US lol.

Posted (edited)

Vasu Mohan who is this guy ? Seems like he went off the grid. His LinkedIn doesn’t exist and twitter. He seems have gotten the 20 million for the Indian votes flip. Something sinister about this guy. 
 

 

 

 

Edited by gattaca
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, mishra said:

One may extrapolate based on events that When Congress party signed MoU with China, I think US wanted Congress to shown its place.

IAC was a totally funded project by Ford Foundation/Deep State/USAID. Rise of Anna Andolan seemed so organic right after Arab Spring and propped Kejruddin to the National political scene . Some conspirators are saying that BJP is not making too much noise about USAID because they don’t want some of their own revealed from the list in the 2012-13 days

Edited by coffee_rules
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, coffee_rules said:

IAC was a totally funded project by Ford Foundation/Deep State/USAID. Rise of Anna Andolan seemed so organic right after Arab Spring and propped Kejruddin to the National political scene . Some conspirators are saying that BJP is not making too much noise about USAID because they don’t want some of their own revealed from the list in the 2012-13 days

Agree on it. After AAP it was BJP that was biggest beneficiary of IAC. But under no circumstances, “2013 Butcher  of Gujrat” had any chance to get USAID Support.

 

it’s scary to even think what could have been potential outcome if BJP wasn’t there in mix to spoil the USAID party. I clearly recall Anna Kejri and all captured imagination of all Indians

Edited by mishra
Posted

As i said in the other thread. The old deep state is being dismantled. The new deep state will take some time to take hold. Strengthen yourself.

 

For all we know there wont be a deep state. Trump appears to be blunt in what he wants to do from Greenland to Taiwan.

Posted
12 minutes ago, G_B_ said:

As i said in the other thread. The old deep state is being dismantled. The new deep state will take some time to take hold. Strengthen yourself.

 

For all we know there wont be a deep state. Trump appears to be blunt in what he wants to do from Greenland to Taiwan.

The deep state conspiracy has been disproven a million times and only the dumbest of the dumb fall for trump and musks lies.

 

There has been enough proof how laughably stupid and lying the deep state conspiracy theory was .

 

It's a bit sad that posters I considered intelligence have shown themselves to be so gullible based on lies of people known to be lifelong liar.

×
×
  • Create New...