Jump to content

Yuvraj Singh: "India vs Pakistan relationship is like miya-biwi. In the morning they quarrel and in the evening they eat together."


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, mesky11 said:

The same Pak Punjabis that give out anti Hindu speeches, all of them from inzi, yousaf, afridi, waqar are scum, inzi even tried converting bhaji, don't see gangly suck up to Bangladeshi players, language thing is just bullshit.

 

Ganguly kab se Punjabi ho gaya?

Posted
1 minute ago, New guy said:

No he was not, at that time rivalry was sky high, it became friendly only after Sachin retired. 

 

Sachin never refused if someone came for advice but he was not like current players laughing with them and proactively helping them and praising them.

Vengksarkar's best friend was Abdul Qadir.Sunny was very close to Zaheer.Gavaskar was effusive in his praise for Zaheer even in his book Idols.

 

Since when laughing with other players has become a sin. Keyboard warriors need to get some life.

 

Why is it wrong to praise Pakistani player. Sachin was no diferent than any other Indian player.Stop making him into something he was not.

 

Rivarly on the field does not mean players cannot be friendly.

Posted (edited)

Ya this yuvi , bhajji show lots of bhaicharra until they are gagged in media. Bhajji and Yuvi in general are low iq people the way they vent out about dhoni did blaha blah, bcci did blah blah and then fund terror afridi organisation. Maha chodu these 2 are. Why cant you be normal than ya we ate together and akhtar thrashed me and bhajji in hotel rooms i mean wtf up conversation are like these. Its not like dravid, sachin and laxman wage war against them but they never go over the top to praise them and earn cheap sympathy of terrorist nation.

Edited by raki05
Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, putrevus said:

Vengksarkar's best friend was Abdul Qadir.Sunny was very close to Zaheer.Gavaskar was effusive in his praise for Zaheer even in his book Idols.

 

Since when laughing with other players has become a sin. Keyboard warriors need to get some life.

 

Why is it wrong to praise Pakistani player. Sachin was no diferent than any other Indian player.Stop making him into something he was not.

 

Rivarly on the field does not mean players cannot be friendly.

What does your examples have to do with sachin? He was clearly different because he didnt do those thing

 

And laughing is a sin when the same players you laugh with then go back and make anti India and pro Kashmir independence statements.

Edited by New guy
Posted
40 minutes ago, singhvivek141 said:

 

I think its more to do with language similarity. Majority of Pak players are Punjabi speaking, hence they can connect easily with Indian Punjabi speaking population.

 

Non Punjabi speaking cricketers may not find same amount of closeness. Plus usually Pak players are extroverts, Sachin was an introvert in every sense.

Correct. Cross border Punjabi camaraderie was a thing in Kapil Dev's time as well. 

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, New guy said:

What does your examples have to do with sachin? He was clearly different because he didnt do those thing

 

And laughing is a sin when the same players you laugh with then go back and make anti India and pro Kashmir independence statements.

The point is Sachin was no different than current or past players.

 

Let them make any statements they want, how is it related to players being friendly.

Edited by putrevus
Posted
37 minutes ago, Lord said:

 

Ganguly kab se Punjabi ho gaya?

Ganguly never sucks upto Bangladeshi players despite him being a Bengali

Posted
51 minutes ago, mesky11 said:

The same Pak Punjabis that give out anti Hindu speeches, all of them from inzi, yousaf, afridi, waqar are scum, inzi even tried converting bhaji, don't see gangly suck up to Bangladeshi players, language thing is just bullshit.

 

Pakistani players in general are good in putting up a show on your face. 

 

Bangladeshi cricketers are rondu everywhere, toxic. Tough for anyone to go along with them.

Posted
1 hour ago, putrevus said:

Vengksarkar's best friend was Abdul Qadir.Sunny was very close to Zaheer.Gavaskar was effusive in his praise for Zaheer even in his book Idols.

 

Since when laughing with other players has become a sin. Keyboard warriors need to get some life.

 

Why is it wrong to praise Pakistani player. Sachin was no diferent than any other Indian player.Stop making him into something he was not.

 

Rivarly on the field does not mean players cannot be friendly.

Praising one is different. Its a feeling of respect.

Being friendly and over-friendly has a thin line. Not to mention India-Pak relationship dynamics started to deteriorate further post Kashmir exodus. Prior to that we were at war but atleast we were on the face of each other, post that Pakistan stopped to new level below and became backstabber.

 

The amount of jaahilpan that Pakistan has adopted post Zia Ul Haq was not present in 70's.

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, singhvivek141 said:

Praising one is different. Its a feeling of respect.

Being friendly and over-friendly has a thin line. Not to mention India-Pak relationship dynamics started to deteriorate further post Kashmir exodus. Prior to that we were at war but atleast we were on the face of each other, post that Pakistan stopped to new level below and became backstabber.

 

The amount of jaahilpan that Pakistan has adopted post Zia Ul Haq was not present in 70's.

I would worry when they stop performing against them. I don't see anything wrong with their behaviour personally.

 

Guy like Kohli has hammered Pakistan the most in whiteball cricket.If he is smiling with their players I would not take any offence to it.

 

FYI they have been backstabbing nation since 1947. That does not mean we turn these matches into jingostic wars and abuse Indian players.

Edited by putrevus
Posted
19 minutes ago, Gollum said:

Yuvraj, Bhajji look down upon non-Punjabi Indians, especially Bihar-UP folks and South Indians. 

 

That irritates me more. Show bhaichara to Pakistanis, fine, but why so much bile for fellow Indians?

Fault of North Hindus. They elevated Sikhs so much with fake history i.e Sikhs saved Hindus etc that Sikhs started to believe their own made up supremacy.

 

The largest Sikh Empire which existed was merely 1/6th the size of Maratha Empire. Marathas and Vijayanagara Kings did a better job of saving Hindus down South than Sikhs ever did in the North.

 

Add the dumb Jatt supremacy to the equation and you'll understand the low IQ behavior of Bhajji and Yuvi.

Posted
23 minutes ago, Gollum said:

Yuvraj, Bhajji look down upon non-Punjabi Indians, especially Bihar-UP folks and South Indians. 

 

That irritates me more. Show bhaichara to Pakistanis, fine, but why so much bile for fellow Indians?

 

 

The same problem is with Bengalis to a lesser extent. 

 

Bengali Hindus are mean towards Bihari Hindu migrants in WB. But the Muslim Bengalis in BD team up with Muslim biharis to kill their Hindu Bengali 'brothers'...

 

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, AshVin said:

Fault of North Hindus. They elevated Sikhs so much with fake history i.e Sikhs saved Hindus etc that Sikhs started to believe their own made up supremacy.

 

The largest Sikh Empire which existed was merely 1/6th the size of Maratha Empire. Marathas and Vijayanagara Kings did a better job of saving Hindus down South than Sikhs ever did in the North.

 

Add the dumb Jatt supremacy to the equation and you'll understand the low IQ behavior of Bhajji and Yuvi.

It's mainly jatt Sikhs that have such superiority complex, it all started after 1857, up Bihar never recovered after that, Britishers created canals in Punjab and jatts became massive land owners.

Posted
12 minutes ago, AuxiliA said:

Yuvi's grandmother would surely be a biwi of some miyan had his ancestors stayed on the wrong side of the border. 

Rawalpindi was the first massacre, Pak Punjabis and pasthuns killed thousands of Sikhs and Hindus yet these Indian Punjabis never learn.

Posted
4 minutes ago, mesky11 said:

It's mainly jatt Sikhs that have such superiority complex, it all started after 1857, up Bihar never recovered after that, Britishers created canals in Punjab and jatts became massive land owners.

I'll never understand jatt supremacy.

 

My only impression of jatts is that they are loud and low IQ.

Posted
43 minutes ago, AshVin said:

I'll never understand jatt supremacy.

 

My only impression of jatts is that they are loud and low IQ.

They been hyped up, had up Bihar been richer and developed these folks would not even been spoken off

×
×
  • Create New...