Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
15 hours ago, Lone Wolf said:

Only solution was forced Sterilization of Dehati and Tribal areas.  Dehat would have vanished and India would not have been handicapped by their burden.  No more ladli behen, no more freebies.  A booming economy.

 

Come on man, you can't just generalise all tribal areas.

Posted
1 hour ago, coffee_rules said:

maybe , I am ok during daytime, but don’t have the guts say at 2 am. You can’t deny that there is a problem in India with women living alone. If we visit regularly, then maybe we get used it. But having read about incidents in Hyd, Delhi, Bangalore, it’ll be a big step. 
 

We can’t do comparison across countries, bad things happen everywhere, it’s better to be cautious. 

 

If the US or any other country published articles on the number of women related issues daily - there would be an uproar there as well. The good thing and bad thing is the volume of news articles we have on the topic. Not saying everything is great. Just stating that this issue is overblown. 

Posted

What is wrong with India is that a section of Indians whom the state sees as historically oppressed are in fact not fit for any decent civilization.

 

Should be made into fertilizer instead of mollycoddling them with freebies.

Posted
9 hours ago, EnterTheVoid said:

Using stats to show that 'India does not have a rape problem' is a red herring, if there was ever one.

You could also use stats to show that Mogadishu, Somalia is safer than Chicago. Let's see if anyone buys it.

It isn't a red herring when stats are divergent by more than an order of magnitude. 

If Mogadishu had ten times or more lower crime rate than Chicago, then yes, it DOES mean that all the nonsense copes about underreporting and **** is just nonsense and cannot explain data divergence to thi ls degree and Mogadishu being worse than Chicago is propaganda, not facts. 

 

India is wàaaaaaaaaay too safe for women compared to the west for it to be a red herring, expecially when Indian rape rate is just median average for Asia. We are 15 times less rapey than usa per capita. 40 times less than uk. 

80 times less than rapistan of Scandinavia and no, it's not due to Muslims, because Sweden was 2nd worst in the world at rape per capita in 2000, back when 97% of Sweden was white. 

 

Whoever told u that 40-50 times difference in rape rate is due to Muh reporting rate flat out lied and failed math. Period 

Posted
8 hours ago, coffee_rules said:

India has a women safety problem. No matter what stats say, I will not let my female family member take uber from the airport at 2am alone. 

My nearly 80 year old mom took 1am Uber in kolkata alone just this December. She's just fine. 

I don't say attention to rape propaganda about India. 

 

If ur relative women are fine taking a cab in any usa city at 1am in downtown, they are safer in any red light district in India at 1am. 

Posted
23 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

It isn't a red herring when stats are divergent by more than an order of magnitude. 

If Mogadishu had ten times or more lower crime rate than Chicago, then yes, it DOES mean that all the nonsense copes about underreporting and **** is just nonsense and cannot explain data divergence to thi ls degree and Mogadishu being worse than Chicago is propaganda, not facts. 

 

India is wàaaaaaaaaay too safe for women compared to the west for it to be a red herring, expecially when Indian rape rate is just median average for Asia. We are 15 times less rapey than usa per capita. 40 times less than uk. 

80 times less than rapistan of Scandinavia and no, it's not due to Muslims, because Sweden was 2nd worst in the world at rape per capita in 2000, back when 97% of Sweden was white. 

 

Whoever told u that 40-50 times difference in rape rate is due to Muh reporting rate flat out lied and failed math. Period 

 

Lol, ok.

Posted
16 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

My nearly 80 year old mom took 1am Uber in kolkata alone just this December. She's just fine. 

I don't say attention to rape propaganda about India. 

 

If ur relative women are fine taking a cab in any usa city at 1am in downtown, they are safer in any red light district in India at 1am. 

 

Just because my head is strong, I will not hit it against a rock. There are things one has to take precautions everywhere. Yes, it might be safe in a red light area at 1 am, but I will not do it, just to prove a point. Stats will not help in practical situations. I avoid going to Chicago/LA South areas or in Bronx. People living there might say it is perfectly safe.

Posted
3 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

 

Just because my head is strong, I will not hit it against a rock. There are things one has to take precautions everywhere. Yes, it might be safe in a red light area at 1 am, but I will not do it, just to prove a point. Stats will not help in practical situations. I avoid going to Chicago/LA South areas or in Bronx. People living there might say it is perfectly safe.

well i am not proving a point either. when we go for durga puja celebrations or diwali, many of the events are near downtown, they end around midnight-1am and most of us take cabs coz we drink....i dont treat India as unsafe than Canada or USA is my point. I take precautions- but the precautions dont become extra due to nonsense rape propaganda against india.

Posted
6 minutes ago, EnterTheVoid said:

 

Lol, ok.

If you think 'lol ok' is a justified answer to a mathematician when he points out that you cannot just wish away data that are ENTIRE ORDER OF MAGNITUDE APART in quantity and meet quality standards for its cohort ( remember - indian rape per capita isnt abnormally low, its perfectly in line with MOST asian nations and nations like japan,china, singapore, uae are closer to india in rape per capita than they are to uk or sweden or usa), then it means two things :

a) you deal in anti-India rape propaganda of the west

b) you dont understand basic statistics.

 

Oh and those western media who say that there is social pressure in India to underreport- there is LEGAL PRESSURE here in west to underreport that is far more decisive in data : western nations do not yeild greater than 5% conviction rate for cases that go to court, India yeilds 27% ( Again, normal stats for Asia). which means western women have 5 times less incentive to go to the police than indian women, as they are 5 times less likely to get justice in court in the first place.

 

Funny how your western or western funded desi media never point out this simple fact about rape justice in the west, eh ???

 

Posted
18 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

If you think 'lol ok' is a justified answer to a mathematician when he points out that you cannot just wish away data that are ENTIRE ORDER OF MAGNITUDE APART in quantity and meet quality standards for its cohort ( remember - indian rape per capita isnt abnormally low, its perfectly in line with MOST asian nations and nations like japan,china, singapore, uae are closer to india in rape per capita than they are to uk or sweden or usa), then it means two things :

a) you deal in anti-India rape propaganda of the west

b) you dont understand basic statistics.

 

Oh and those western media who say that there is social pressure in India to underreport- there is LEGAL PRESSURE here in west to underreport that is far more decisive in data : western nations do not yeild greater than 5% conviction rate for cases that go to court, India yeilds 27% ( Again, normal stats for Asia). which means western women have 5 times less incentive to go to the police than indian women, as they are 5 times less likely to get justice in court in the first place.

 

Funny how your western or western funded desi media never point out this simple fact about rape justice in the west, eh ???

 

 

Lol, ok.

Posted
2 hours ago, DeepSpace said:

All Indians domestic or phoren should be castrated to stop this scourge!!! :nod:

U must be from some muslim royal descent to love the idea of castrated men so much. 

Posted
Just now, Muloghonto said:

U must be from some muslim royal descent to love the idea of castrated men so much. 

Go * yourself! 

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, DeepSpace said:

Go * yourself! 

Nah. Women you know well satisfy that need well :) 

I guess that's why u r so interested in ball less men 

Edited by Muloghonto
Posted
24 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

Nah. Women you know well satisfy that need well :) 

I guess that's why u r so interested in ball less men 

I am interested in ball less men because you love to rape! :lol:

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, DeepSpace said:

I am interested in ball less men because you love to rape! :lol:

Ah yes that's why Indian rape rate like all of Asia is about 20-100 times lower per capita than Europe and desis are 4x less rapey per capita than whites in usa. 

 

Nah. U r interested in ball less men coz that's in ur culture and genes...

 

Ps: What happened to ur word that it was ur last response to me ?? Libbu or moozie or christoid have no value to their word...thanks for demonstration.  

Edited by Muloghonto
Posted
21 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

Ah yes that's why Indian rape rate like all of Asia is about 20-100 times lower per capita than Europe and desis are 4x less rapey per capita than whites in usa. 

 

Nah. U r interested in ball less men coz that's in ur culture and genes...

 

Ps: What happened to ur word that it was ur last response to me ?? Libbu or moozie or christoid have no value to their word...thanks for demonstration.  

That was in the other thread ausshole! This one will be my last response on this thread to you. I correctly guessed that you love rape by providing other excuses you pathetic example of a human being. You are a Hindu my auss!

×
×
  • Create New...