Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
47 minutes ago, Ultimate_Game said:

@maniac ka kahar! :fear1::fear:

 

Maniac's superpower turned even a team like SRH into Pakistan :((

This year pitches have balance

Edited by Suhaan
Posted
1 hour ago, Ultimate_Game said:

 

Good. Would also like to see boundary size to be 70m or more. Hate seeing 60-65m sixes.

Superstars won't be able to clear boundaries with ease.

Specially those who are ruling courtesy of 55-60 meter sixes.

Posted
9 hours ago, singhvivek141 said:

Superstars won't be able to clear boundaries with ease.

Specially those who are ruling courtesy of 55-60 meter sixes.

 

That's what we want to see. Doodh ka doodh aur pani ka pani ho jayega.

 

We want actual hitters to come through rather than this run inflation where Ayush Badoni can hit 4-5 6s in a game when he would barely be able to hit the ball to long off or long on if the boundaries were standard size. Plus we want more balanced matches where a score between 180-200 is a good score and 160-170 is competitive. These 240-250 scores are lowering the interest in games with extra flat pitches with miniscule boundaries which will give NZ grounds a run for their money.

Posted
On 4/4/2025 at 6:45 PM, Ultimate_Game said:

 

That's what we want to see. Doodh ka doodh aur pani ka pani ho jayega.

 

We want actual hitters to come through rather than this run inflation where Ayush Badoni can hit 4-5 6s in a game when he would barely be able to hit the ball to long off or long on if the boundaries were standard size. Plus we want more balanced matches where a score between 180-200 is a good score and 160-170 is competitive. These 240-250 scores are lowering the interest in games with extra flat pitches with miniscule boundaries which will give NZ grounds a run for their money.

Batsmen won't develop if scores are limited to 160-170

Need good batting surfaces ,not saying in the range of 280+ ,still should be average 190

Posted
1 minute ago, Suhaan said:

Batsmen won't develop if scores are limited to 160-170

Need good batting surfaces ,not saying in the range of 280+ ,still should be average 190

 

Batters should need to work for runs as well. I'm not asking for bowler's paradises. Just a bit of help and longer boundaries of min length being 70m. 55-60m 6s devalue runs as even edges and mishits fly for 6s.

 

Ideal pitches should be ones where the par score is around 170. If batters play well they score 190-200 and if bowlers bowl well, they can limit opponents to 150-160.

Posted
1 minute ago, Ultimate_Game said:

 

Batters should need to work for runs as well. I'm not asking for bowler's paradises. Just a bit of help and longer boundaries of min length being 70m. 55-60m 6s devalue runs as even edges and mishits fly for 6s.

 

Ideal pitches should be ones where the par score is around 170. If batters play well they score 190-200 and if bowlers bowl well, they can limit opponents to 150-160.

Even on 170 pitches batsmen are optimising run scoring that is why you see 200+ scores just recently yesterday

Not like these are out and out sticky or bowler friendly wickets

Just like batsmen,bowlers too have evolved ,I'm not saying go.for the kill and prepare turfs and watch them rake up 270-280+ on a regular manner

Doesn't matter how much we criticize, cricket will be and always will be batsmen dominated ,we won't see batsmen improving especially in t20s if they are continuosly played on 160-170+ surfaces

×
×
  • Create New...