Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Laaloo said:

@Gollum just saw a video on Reddit about some Muhammad guy going to a Annapurna temple in Pune and pissing on murtis. Brave Hindus in retaliation are having strong protest march :hatsoff: that will show them.

Saw that video just now. 

 

Forget Pak, BD. 

 

Imagine situation reversed in India, the 'blasphemer' would have been beheaded (STSJ) within the premises of the mosque/dargah, and pan-India riots killing 20 other Hindus. 

 

Why are we so spineless?

Posted (edited)
Edited by Gollum
Posted (edited)
Edited by Gollum
Posted
11 hours ago, ravishingravi said:

 

Probably 2 years too late already. It has to be 101 like taking something from stranger. 

 

Unfortunately true. 

No, I became aware of the differences at around 9 years old.

 

My son will be fine.

 

I went for a walk in Southall the other week and saw about 5 Star of David graffiti pieces. Thr mohammedans don't mess when you stand up to them or appease them.

Posted
6 hours ago, Gollum said:

@straighttalk innocent and peaceful muslim. Bloddy literally these islamist are curse to the world, they only trust in killing and raping kaafirs. Hope we had all of them kicked out post independence.

Posted
15 hours ago, Lone Wolf said:

There was basically the red line set up by US Ruskis and Chinks to not invade West Pakistan.  Still India held significant territory along Pathankot Jammu Border in Shakargarh.

Shimla agreement was forced upon her.

 

She went against everyone to invade Bangladesh. What made her accept this after she succeeded and broke Pak apart? Ruskis could care less about Pak at that time. Chinks hardly mattered. Pak was firmly in the US camp. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, bharathh said:

 

She went against everyone to invade Bangladesh. What made her accept this after she succeeded and broke Pak apart? Ruskis could care less about Pak at that time. Chinks hardly mattered. Pak was firmly in the US camp. 

Invading Bangladesh was a masterstroke.  How could you have secured a fragile North East otherwise without cutting out East Pakistan?  US and Pakistan were already training NE insurgents within East Pakistan.

It would have slipped from us a while back if not for 71.

 

Also it is widely accepted Shimla agreement was forced upon us... Russia wasn't willing to support us if we completely invaded West Pakistan.  US obviously wasn't having any of it... China was well China.

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, bharathh said:

 

She went against everyone to invade Bangladesh. What made her accept this after she succeeded and broke Pak apart? Ruskis could care less about Pak at that time. Chinks hardly mattered. Pak was firmly in the US camp. 

She went coz she got full support of KGB. Indira was extremely close to KGB and thats why the reality of death of Shastriji in USSR never came out.

 

Russia wanted to become a major player in South Asia and hence played a key role in Shimla agreement as well.

 

USSR became confident of his role post Vietnam victory and hence attacked Afghanistan, where he lost badly and since then, the disintegration started.

Posted
1 hour ago, Lone Wolf said:

Invading Bangladesh was a masterstroke.  How could you have secured a fragile North East otherwise without cutting out East Pakistan?  US and Pakistan were already training NE insurgents within East Pakistan.

It would have slipped from us a while back if not for 71.

 

Also it is widely accepted Shimla agreement was forced upon us... Russia wasn't willing to support us if we completely invaded West Pakistan.  US obviously wasn't having any of it... China was well China.

 

 

She didn't need to invade. She had 90k POWs to bargain with. We just handed over everything like good little poodles. we didn't even bargain with BD to increase the size of the chicken neck. BD would have done anything for us at that time. 

 

Just arrogance and short term thinking from Indira G and her advisors. Euphoria from winning the war scrambled their minds IMO. 

Posted
2 hours ago, raki05 said:

@straighttalk innocent muslims.

I think you guys confabulate things

 

Not every Muslims are innocent ..neither are every Hindus Christians etc.

There are criminal assholes in every religion..and irrespective of their religion they should be punished.

 

Where I disagree with you is just because  few Muslims commit this crime ..your group wants to paint every Muslim in the same brush .we are not the rape capital of the world after South Africa just because rape is committed by Muslims only..Nirbjaya Rg Kar case were committed by demented asshole irrespective of religion .same here ...so I am with you in giving this Muslim mother *ers death sentence but I am not with you when you say just being Muslim make you a rapist .otherwise the same theory can be applied to other religions too

Posted
2 hours ago, raki05 said:

@straighttalk innocent and peaceful muslim. Bloddy literally these islamist are curse to the world, they only trust in killing and raping kaafirs. Hope we had all of them kicked out post independence.

No one is supporting the people committing these crimes ..why are you tagging me saying innocent muslims...there are criminals and demented *ers in every religion form Catholic popes  to our seers...action of one doesn't make another person guilty. It's as if the rapist attacks on foreign tourists by our fellow citizens. Means innocent Indians by your logic.

Posted
6 minutes ago, straighttalk said:

I think you guys confabulate things

 

Not every Muslims are innocent ..neither are every Hindus Christians etc.

There are criminal assholes in every religion..and irrespective of their religion they should be punished.

 

Where I disagree with you is just because  few Muslims commit this crime ..your group wants to paint every Muslim in the same brush .we are not the rape capital of the world after South Africa just because rape is committed by Muslims only..Nirbjaya Rg Kar case were committed by demented asshole irrespective of religion .same here ...so I am with you in giving this Muslim mother *ers death sentence but I am not with you when you say just being Muslim make you a rapist .otherwise the same theory can be applied to other religions too

Lol at few muslims commit this crime have you seen ideology behind it….. its not and individual hindu/ muslim did rape crime. Have you read the confession of mastermind  , these jihadis are driven by sick ideology of raping hindu women and that b@stard and his ills are proud of it. Whether its ajmer or bhopal these jihadis are doing it under islamic agenda, so dont just walk away by saying all religion does that. How many hindu/chrisian/sikh gang did mass rape of muslims or any other religion women and tried to forced them to convert and forced them to do fasting. Bloddy these jihadis are driven  by sickness called islamic brainwashing and islamization of entire world. So dont  club others with your’s disgusting religious practice.

Posted
55 minutes ago, straighttalk said:

I think you guys confabulate things

 

Not every Muslims are innocent ..neither are every Hindus Christians etc.

There are criminal assholes in every religion..and irrespective of their religion they should be punished.

 

Where I disagree with you is just because  few Muslims commit this crime ..your group wants to paint every Muslim in the same brush .we are not the rape capital of the world after South Africa just because rape is committed by Muslims only..Nirbjaya Rg Kar case were committed by demented asshole irrespective of religion .same here ...so I am with you in giving this Muslim mother *ers death sentence but I am not with you when you say just being Muslim make you a rapist .otherwise the same theory can be applied to other religions too

There are indeed criminal assholes in every religion, but there is only one religion which gives them cover fire.

 

Shami posted a picture of shivling, wishing everyone happy new year. His insta was spammed by jihadis who were calling him a murtad, and even calling out the rape of her daughter.

APJ Abdul Kalam, who is by far the best Muslim a nation can ask, same community never even consider him as one of theirs and instead run behind jihadis like Zakir Naik instead.

 

Whn Israel attacked Palestine, Kashmiri Muslims were protesting in Kashmir and called out the bandh. When Hindus were killed...only a handful of them came on street with candles and some were even laughing. Whats their relationship with Palestinians ? Care to explain

 

We have seen the difference in the people who attended the funeral of Lt. Fayaz vs Burhan Wani...both were Kashmiris but choose different paths. Did you forget the crowd which attended funeral of Yakub Memon ?

Posted
1 hour ago, bharathh said:

 

She didn't need to invade. She had 90k POWs to bargain with. We just handed over everything like good little poodles. we didn't even bargain with BD to increase the size of the chicken neck. BD would have done anything for us at that time. 

 

Just arrogance and short term thinking from Indira G and her advisors. Euphoria from winning the war scrambled their minds IMO. 

90k PoWs didn't mean sh*t when US and China were out to get you.  As soon as Snows would melt.. US would have greenlit Chinese offensive in the Himalayas.

 

Indian objectives were already achieved.  A seperate nation was carved out .. US was humiliated.

 

It was a supermassive W already by a newly Independent country against all odds.  Always remember even Pakistan's Pci was much higher than us during that period and were much ahead of us in Socio economic indicators.  India overcame all of that in two wars in six years gap.

Israel can't do in its dreams what we achieved.

 

Compare those scenarios to today... When we are still struggling to mount an offensive.

Posted
2 hours ago, Lone Wolf said:

90k PoWs didn't mean sh*t when US and China were out to get you.  As soon as Snows would melt.. US would have greenlit Chinese offensive in the Himalayas.

 

Indian objectives were already achieved.  A seperate nation was carved out .. US was humiliated.

 

It was a supermassive W already by a newly Independent country against all odds.  Always remember even Pakistan's Pci was much higher than us during that period and were much ahead of us in Socio economic indicators.  India overcame all of that in two wars in six years gap.

Israel can't do in its dreams what we achieved.

 

Compare those scenarios to today... When we are still struggling to mount an offensive.

 Brother israel dint just defeated all arab countries together in 6 days war but also grabbed their massive land and made their size almost double than how it was before 6 days war..

Posted
1 hour ago, raki05 said:

 Brother israel dint just defeated all arab countries together in 6 days war but also grabbed their massive land and made their size almost double than how it was before 6 days war..

All those states were non NATO and Pakistan was involved in several defence pacts with US and was/is a major non NATO ally.

 

Diplomatically US was always behind Israel.

Also Israel would be sh**ing if it were facing both Pakistan and China on both fronts unlike poor rag tag Arab militaries.

 

India had no one but Russia with strings attached.

Posted
1 hour ago, Lone Wolf said:

All those states were non NATO and Pakistan was involved in several defence pacts with US and was/is a major non NATO ally.

 

Diplomatically US was always behind Israel.

Also Israel would be sh**ing if it were facing both Pakistan and China on both fronts unlike poor rag tag Arab militaries.

 

India had no one but Russia with strings attached.

But at that time neither pak nor china was that strong…… China was still struggling with their economy also they dint have expansionist mindset against India as of today and if its not for nehru ji misadventures chinese wouldnt even have attacked us. Indra gandhi was great leader but she shouldn’t have given up advantage which we had over pak under US pressure as US was already covered by russian. Also once war was over no one initiate it once again especially US/China as they dint loose any territory.

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, straighttalk said:

I think you guys confabulate things

 

Not every Muslims are innocent ..neither are every Hindus Christians etc.

There are criminal assholes in every religion..and irrespective of their religion they should be punished.

 

Where I disagree with you is just because  few Muslims commit this crime ..your group wants to paint every Muslim in the same brush .we are not the rape capital of the world after South Africa just because rape is committed by Muslims only..Nirbjaya Rg Kar case were committed by demented asshole irrespective of religion .same here ...so I am with you in giving this Muslim mother *ers death sentence but I am not with you when you say just being Muslim make you a rapist .otherwise the same theory can be applied to other religions too

@Lord so you also agreed with him that its a crime like Nirbhaya and has no ideology and planned action against non muslim, especially when perpetrator and his ilks accepted that. I can sense now why our country elite falls for these Islamist agenda and ready to defend it or silently support them.

Edited by raki05
×
×
  • Create New...