Should Indian players shake hands today with Bangladeshi team?

[Vilander]

On 10/30/2025 at 4:43 PM, straighttalk said:

My issue is with blaming 200 millions Indian Muslims for actions done by a few

My issue is you creating a strawman that calling out Islam is calling out all Muslims. Humans impact through actions, Ideology impacts through a movement. Praxis such as Jihad. 

[Texy]

On 10/22/2025 at 6:38 PM, straighttalk said:

You have a comprehension problem...terrorism is not just an Islamic problem ..number one..there is white nationalist terrorism too. Secondly many modern terrorist attacks are done by Muslims but they are not the majority of Muslims..most Muslims are normal people just leading their lives with their own problems...you and your ilk try to blame the actions of few terrorists on the entire community. That's the problem. No one is denying that most terrorist attacks in India are perpetrated by Islamic terrorists but when I said don't bring up isolated cases...how many terrorists are there in the 200 million Indian Muslims...punish those who are terrorists not people for being Muslim or some other religion.

It doesnt matter if a small minority within worldwideislam participates in terror activity ... the issue is 2 billion muslims, normal, terror, psycho all believe in ONE THING... being an infidel(iespecially idol worshipping) IS A BIGGER SIN than raping or murdering someone, which is the core source of hate.. which is why LITERATE, ILLITERATE, NOBEL winner, tire puncture man all agree in this one truth and those anomalies who dont are not really practicing muslim like APJ abdul Kalam, Taslima Nasrin. wWich is why many fellow muslims hate them and call them kfir

Edited November 1 by Texy

[Zero_Unit]

1 hour ago, Vilander said:

Dude you are irrelevant you are arguing for Islamic politics without facts in a cricket fan site 

Bro, you ok in the head? I did not even talk about any islamic thing or bring up any religious thing on this discussion. Wrong person ...

Edited November 1 by Zero_Unit

[Ranvir]

On 10/15/2025 at 3:45 PM, straighttalk said:

I think putting religion above country is not an issue as long as you don't harm your country. In India Muslims are marginalized in many places due to lack of education and societal stature as well as discrimination and minority status. Yes congress and other pseudo secular parties try to provide sops to win their votes. 

 

So naturally they are disgruntled...their way of life is different from ours. But at a certain point you have to ask how exactly they are threatening India.i am talking about the average Indian Muslims not the Paksitani jehadi.  Don't bring up an isolated Muslim terrorist..we know they exist and we should jail them. But this idea that Muslims in Indian are organized to uproot Hindus and hence we need to eliminate them from India is a idea to generated hatred between communities so that the majority voted for a govt while we all are screwed economically and financiallly...with a. State controlled media and govt agencies acting as party goons...we are essentially screwed....modi is still a better alternative than Congress but he better tries to win votes base don his development agenda and work rather than Mangalsutra hoax and spreading communal hatred.

When they become a majority they are no different than Pakistanis. Look at Kashmir. I always laugh when people tell me Indian Muslims are 'better' than Pakistanis. No difference whatsoever in my eyes.

[Vilander]

19 hours ago, Zero_Unit said:

Bro, you ok in the head? I did not even talk about any islamic thing or bring up any religious thing on this discussion. Wrong person ...

Looks like it 

Edited November 1 by Vilander

[Vilander]

On 10/26/2025 at 8:59 PM, Zero_Unit said:

I hear the ind/bd women team did not shake hands with each other? What drama unfolded this time around? What is this new nonsense about not shaking hands man?

 

On 10/26/2025 at 10:49 PM, Zero_Unit said:

I guess social media cooking up nonsense stories

Ok this is crossfire.

[straighttalk]

On 11/1/2025 at 3:43 PM, Ranvir said:

When they become a majority they are no different than Pakistanis. Look at Kashmir. I always laugh when people tell me Indian Muslims are 'better' than Pakistanis. No difference whatsoever in my eyes.

What is the fault of Indian Muslims or even Pakistani Muslims as long as they are not committing terrorism violence or breaking laws. Their culture is different...as long as they dont bring sharia and try to impose their illiberal views I don't have a problem with their existence.  I have never seen a Muslim in India trying to force Hindus to follow their customs..there is segregation and the worst that has happened is riots and violence with blame on both sides. .most normal Hindus and Muslims stays away from such violence.

[Ranvir]

On 11/4/2025 at 1:04 AM, straighttalk said:

What is the fault of Indian Muslims or even Pakistani Muslims as long as they are not committing terrorism violence or breaking laws. Their culture is different...as long as they dont bring sharia and try to impose their illiberal views I don't have a problem with their existence.  I have never seen a Muslim in India trying to force Hindus to follow their customs..there is segregation and the worst that has happened is riots and violence with blame on both sides. .most normal Hindus and Muslims stays away from such violence.

The problem I have is that they demanded Pakistan and Bangladesh and used violence for their cause but they left 1/3 of their population in India whereas the number of non muslims in their country is small in comparison.

 

Would they ever allow a Hindu or Sikh equivalent of Shah Rukh Khan in their countries? But they expect liberalism in India.

[Lord]

Happy Gurpurab bro @Ranvir

[pramodk]

https://sports.ndtv.com/hockey/amid-bccis-asia-cup-row-hockey-india-takes-opposite-no-handshake-stance-9574416

 

Some of the greatest men of our times Mahatma Ghandhi, Nelson Mandela and Martin Luther King chose peace and reconciliation and were killed and jailed for their stance.

 

I wonder what is the best stance , to show the Pakistani establishment what they did was wrong in all spheres of our interaction...and stand with the innocent people who got killed...(Non violently, like no shake hands).  

 

I think we should support the great Pakistanis like Imran Khan, who wants to do good but jailed ... because the military establishment in Pakistan wants to promote their power and extremely bad policies that has already killed their own country financially, politically and directing the population  to another direction, India..as if India is at fault.It's not religion, it's power politics of the worst kind...  

 

[New guy]

The overall stance here seems to be - followers of Islam are violent and have a violent ideology. And if people are in majority they will be violent and take over others.

 

Ok, agreed. 

 

But then the solution they propose is that Hindus should be as violent and agressive and use force to control them.

 

This is mind blowing to me. So you saw somthing as bad and you want your religion to be a copy of that bad thing?

 

Pakistan is living proof of how allowing the majority to control minorties using religion leads the country down to path of destruction. Yet this is exactly what our religious nuts want too.

 

They hate what one relegion and country does but want our country and relegion to be a copy of that and violently oppress minority in our country.

 

This is hilarious double thinking. The only lesson we should learn is that we should do the opposite of Pakistan, respect our minorities and never let the majority dominate to be the opposite of Pakistan.

 

We have progressed as a nation because we are not Pakistan. Some Hinduism ke fake thekedars want us to be a copy of Pakistan and go down the same path of destruction.

Edited November 6 by New guy

[rollingstoned]

1 hour ago, New guy said:

 

But then the solution they propose is that Hindus should be as violent and agressive and use force to control them.

 

You cannot neutralize poison with nectar. It doesn't make you the same as the perpetrator if you mirror them in self defence. A nuance dimwit liberals don't seem to get but that's no shocker. 

 

1 hour ago, New guy said:

This is mind blowing to me. So you saw somthing as bad and you want your religion to be a copy of that bad thing?

 

Literally no one said this lmao. Trying to secure your existence doesn't make your 'religion' sharia compliant no more than virtue signalling 'tolerance' and trying to stick your head in the sand thus putting yourself in existential danger makes you broad minded and enlightened. This sort of braindead logic can be used to claim that killing someone who is trying to kill you makes you no better than that person. 

 

1 hour ago, New guy said:

We have progressed as a nation because we are not Pakistan. Some Hinduism ke fake thekedars want us to be a copy of Pakistan and go down the same path of destruction.

Liberal sickular  thekedars who live in their idealized bubble and don't know ass from elbow re any of Hinduism, Islam or even liberalism shouldn't give homilies on what anyone should or should not do & attempt to put people in the same state of fog that they themselves are in. 

1 hour ago, New guy said:

This is hilarious double thinking. The only lesson we should learn is that we should do the opposite of Pakistan, respect our minorities and never let the majority dominate to be the opposite of Pakistan.

 

Pakistan's problems are not because the 'majority' dominate the 'minority' which is a symptom and not cause btw. There is no reason to use them as a locus for any sort of ethical reasoning on what we should or should not do as a nation, especially if we have the bare minimum common sense & are capable of thinking for ourselves. It is not like the majority lead great lives there. If a society may not prosper because it's minorities don't advance it will cease to exist never mind thrive if it prioritizes appeasing and bending over backwards for inimical communities - who are not even minorities but a second largest majority - by playing foolish 0 sum games and lying to itself.

[New guy]

50 minutes ago, rollingstoned said:

You cannot neutralize poison with nectar. It doesn't make you the same as the perpetrator if you mirror them in self defence. A nuance dimwit liberals don't seem to get but that's no shocker. 

 

Literally no one said this lmao. Trying to secure your existence doesn't make your 'religion' sharia compliant no more than virtue signalling 'tolerance' and trying to stick your head in the sand thus putting yourself in existential danger makes you broad minded and enlightened. This sort of braindead logic can be used to claim that killing someone who is trying to kill you makes you no better than that person. 

 

Liberal sickular  thekedars who live in their idealized bubble and don't know ass from elbow re any of Hinduism, Islam or even liberalism shouldn't give homilies on what anyone should or should not do & attempt to put people in the same state of fog that they themselves are in. 

Pakistan's problems are not because the 'majority' dominate the 'minority' which is a symptom and not cause btw. There is no reason to use them as a locus for any sort of ethical reasoning on what we should or should not do as a nation, especially if we have the bare minimum common sense & are capable of thinking for ourselves. It is not like the majority lead great lives there. If a society may not prosper because it's minorities don't advance it will cease to exist never mind thrive if it prioritizes appeasing and bending over backwards for inimical communities - who are not even minorities but a second largest majority - by playing foolish 0 sum games and lying to itself.

What self defence? What danger are we in that we need self defense? We are peaceful and progressing as a country. Secure our existence against what? Neutralize what? We are living in the safest and most peaceful phase of Indian history. 

 

Since the 80s, in india Hindus have been on a steady path of progress and growth, they are way more educated, more wealthy, live longer, are in more powerful places. So what is this threat?

 

These are cold hard data and facts, not your imaginary delusional threats.

 

The low IQ mentally ill communal bigot sees danger everywhere because politicians have lied to them to gain power and they swallowed those lies.

 

We don't have to look at pakistan. We have example of every single country in history where letting majority running rampant has left to fascism and destruction of the country, whether it's germany or Afghanistan or Pakistan or any other country.

 

America is now going the same way. By welcoming diversity they became the foremost country in the world. Now they are embracing hatred and bigotry and it's the path to destruction.

 

The only exceptions would be country like middle East where they are propped by external factors like oil and not have a huge indigenous population so technically they are not in majority even if they have shades of fascism. If they had a huge population and outsiders were less, they would have gone the same way of destruction.

 

People seeing imaginary dangers and fighting among themselves is the easiest path to destruction for any country. I grew up during the Babri Masjid riots and how it set back out county for a couple of decades.

 

The British did that to us. ISI wants to do that to us. Politicians want to use it to rule. And the low IQ gullible morons fall for it every single time. They see danger when reality is we are peaceful and progressing unlike our neighbours.

Edited November 6 by New guy

[rollingstoned]

1 hour ago, New guy said:

What self defence? What danger are we in that we need self defense? We are peaceful and progressing as a country. Secure our existence against what? Neutralize what? We are living in the safest and most peaceful phase of Indian history. 

Self defence against global jihad and Islamic extremism. you know the one that caused a partition already and caused an exodus of Hindus already from one part of the nation which dumb*s like you already forgot and rationalised away. The good book which infomed it hasn't changed nor have it's adherents who still have a goal in mind. Your ignorance and wishful thinking doesn't mean it doesn't exist. 

This 'most peaceful' phase was after much religious violence and denialism btw and hasn't abated yet. If the nation is peaceful and 'safe' it is because of the values of the majority community, something that is worth preserving. 

 

1 hour ago, New guy said:

Since the 80s, in india Hindus have been on a steady path of progress and growth, they are way more educated, more wealthy, live longer, are in more powerful places. So what is this threat?

 

These are cold hard data and facts, not your imaginary delusional threats.

That is because of the values they have and the trust they have in the state machinery despite it's obvious fundamental ideological issues and the genocide denial it practices re real reason of Partition, whatever progress came despite and not because of it. Hindus have been demographically displaced too btw even internally which the state itself denies and every area where they became a minority has seen violence and separatism. These are also cold hard facts which blow to smithereens any secular delusions of syncretic harmony which you no doubt ignore or the real reasons for why it seems to exist. The ones bent on their agenda rely on useful idiots like you and even boast about it on record btw which didn't end just because a new nation was created. 

 

1 hour ago, New guy said:

The low IQ mentally ill communal bigot sees danger everywhere because politicians have lied to them to gain power and they swallowed those lies.

Lmao being a dumb cretinous 'progressive' cultist who plays fast and loose with reality along with having 0 knowledge of history and collective lived experience doesn't make the person who can call a spade a spade a 'low IQ mentally ill communal bigot' who doesn't project like you who has to keep bandying stale long debunked tropes like 'muh politicians lied to us to divide us reee'. For all their stereotypical moral panic around Hitler & fascism libtards with 0 self awareness embody Goebbels and his philosophy like no one else. 

 

1 hour ago, New guy said:

We don't have to look at pakistan. We have example of every single country in history where letting majority running rampant has left to fascism and destruction of the country, whether it's germany or Afghanistan or Pakistan or any other country.

Source is trust me vro and your bunghole for the above I'm sure like all the others. There are numerous eg.s of intolerant minorities who destroy nations and civilizations btw because they were being appeased, you'd know them if you'd ever bothered trying to educate yourself instead of just being plugged into the hive mind and regurgitating stale platitudes. 

The heuristic is not majority or minority here but of values. For all the moral panic around the sceptre of numerical majorities gassing minorities which certain people like to masturbate about it is a minority group eg Upper castes who often get blamed for all the imaginary problems and minority invaders who often lay waste to nations and bring about it's destruction. Funny how sauce for the goose is not sauce for the gander when you don't have a dishonest narrative to push.

 

1 hour ago, New guy said:

America is now going the same way. By welcoming diversity they became the foremost country in the world. Now they are embracing hatred and bigotry and it's the path to destruction.

Immigrant nation from the beginning and also not true. They have always seen themselves as a white Protestant nation while allowing immigrants to come in on a need to allow basis. Their advancement wasn't just because they had to become an immigrant melting pot, that came after. The need to allow movement of people doesn't mean there needs to be no theoretical hard limits on whom you choose to still allow, there's no ethical conundrum here and even if the nation wants to go down the tubes it isn't necessarily 'bigotry' to decide to not allow certain people or want to throw out illegals.

1 hour ago, New guy said:

The only exceptions would be country like middle East where they are propped by external factors like oil and not have a huge indigenous population so technically they are not in majority even if they have shades of fascism. If they had a huge population and outsiders were less, they would have gone the same way of destruction.

 

Koreans, Chinese and Japanese are anal about whom they allow in and are more progressive and developed than any oil rich Mid east nation who have to allow expats as a matter of necessity who don't get any citizenship and have a lot of restrictions. The criteria here is having the right model of nationhood that is honest to your lived experience and not some ridiculous cult like deference toward 'diversity uber alles'. How you get there is upto you though nations who lie to themselves tend to either get destroyed or just exist in a stagnant unstable limbo trying to uphold abstractions like freedumb, tolerance and liberty and put cart before horse.

 

1 hour ago, New guy said:

People seeing imaginary dangers and fighting among themselves is the easiest path to destruction for any country. I grew up during the Babri Masjid riots and how it set back out county for a couple of decades.

 

Yes we should just put our head in the sand and pontificate mindlessly about things we don't understand and aren't even true just because they sound good. 

If Babri masjid demolition which happened in '92 set the country back 2 decades which coincides with the post liberalisation era then maybe we should have many more of those since nation started progressing in all metrics on a different level only since then but then again you're talking bs as usual. If someone starts a riot and celebrates genocidal bigots then they deserve the same treatment & a clapback with interest, at least for a people with any self respect. Communal harmony can't be a 0 sum game which useful idiots of the secular kind uphold as some enlightened ideal while denying history and sacrificing truth at the altar. 

 

Quote

The British did that to us. ISI wants to do that to us. Politicians want to use it to rule. And the low IQ gullible morons fall for it every single time. They see danger when reality is we are peaceful and progressing unlike our neighbours.

British didn't divide any more than what divisions already existed, it's not like this place was some syncretic utopia before them. ISI is also telling you that oil and water can't mix so they inhabit reality and are reminding you of it which the secular fabulists here still want to deny in all their ignorance. More politicians have ruled using the sham of secular harmony and ganga jamuni tehzeeb btw than the Bollywood trope which was used to indoctrinate low iq gullible idiots like you that it is the 'politicians who do it'. Even pakistanis are not so dumb as to say this when not faced with a camera.

If we are peaceful then it's probably worth keeping it that way i think, sticking your head in the sand to virtue signal and gain 'good citizen points' when it contradicts reality and history is a surefire way to lead to another partition which for some reason certain people either forget happened or deny the reasons why it happened. Yet they want to indignantly engage in low iq rhetorical gymnastics and dishonest emotionalism lol.

Edited November 6 by rollingstoned

[raki05]

2 hours ago, rollingstoned said:

Self defence against global jihad and Islamic extremism. you know the one that caused a partition already and caused an exodus of Hindus already from one part of the nation which dumb*s like you already forgot and rationalised away. The good book which infomed it hasn't changed nor have it's adherents who still have a goal in mind. Your ignorance and wishful thinking doesn't mean it doesn't exist. 

This 'most peaceful' phase was after much religious violence and denialism btw and hasn't abated yet. If the nation is peaceful and 'safe' it is because of the values of the majority community, something that is worth preserving. 

 

That is because of the values they have and the trust they have in the state machinery despite it's obvious fundamental ideological issues and the genocide denial it practices re real reason of Partition, whatever progress came despite and not because of it. Hindus have been demographically displaced too btw even internally which the state itself denies and every area where they became a minority has seen violence and separatism. These are also cold hard facts which blow to smithereens any secular delusions of syncretic harmony which you no doubt ignore or the real reasons for why it seems to exist. The ones bent on their agenda rely on useful idiots like you and even boast about it on record btw which didn't end just because a new nation was created. 

 

Lmao being a dumb cretinous 'progressive' cultist who plays fast and loose with reality along with having 0 knowledge of history and collective lived experience doesn't make the person who can call a spade a spade a 'low IQ mentally ill communal bigot' who doesn't project like you who has to keep bandying stale long debunked tropes like 'muh politicians lied to us to divide us reee'. For all their stereotypical moral panic around Hitler & fascism libtards with 0 self awareness embody Goebbels and his philosophy like no one else. 

 

Source is trust me vro and your bunghole for the above I'm sure like all the others. There are numerous eg.s of intolerant minorities who destroy nations and civilizations btw because they were being appeased, you'd know them if you'd ever bothered trying to educate yourself instead of just being plugged into the hive mind and regurgitating stale platitudes. 

The heuristic is not majority or minority here but of values. For all the moral panic around the sceptre of numerical majorities gassing minorities which certain people like to masturbate about it is a minority group eg Upper castes who often get blamed for all the imaginary problems and minority invaders who often lay waste to nations and bring about it's destruction. Funny how sauce for the goose is not sauce for the gander when you don't have a dishonest narrative to push.

 

Immigrant nation from the beginning and also not true. They have always seen themselves as a white Protestant nation while allowing immigrants to come in on a need to allow basis. Their advancement wasn't just because they had to become an immigrant melting pot, that came after. The need to allow movement of people doesn't mean there needs to be no theoretical hard limits on whom you choose to still allow, there's no ethical conundrum here and even if the nation wants to go down the tubes it isn't necessarily 'bigotry' to decide to not allow certain people or want to throw out illegals.

Koreans, Chinese and Japanese are anal about whom they allow in and are more progressive and developed than any oil rich Mid east nation who have to allow expats as a matter of necessity who don't get any citizenship and have a lot of restrictions. The criteria here is having the right model of nationhood that is honest to your lived experience and not some ridiculous cult like deference toward 'diversity uber alles'. How you get there is upto you though nations who lie to themselves tend to either get destroyed or just exist in a stagnant unstable limbo trying to uphold abstractions like freedumb, tolerance and liberty and put cart before horse.

 

Yes we should just put our head in the sand and pontificate mindlessly about things we don't understand and aren't even true just because they sound good. 

If Babri masjid demolition which happened in '92 set the country back 2 decades which coincides with the post liberalisation era then maybe we should have many more of those since nation started progressing in all metrics on a different level only since then but then again you're talking bs as usual. If someone starts a riot and celebrates genocidal bigots then they deserve the same treatment & a clapback with interest, at least for a people with any self respect. Communal harmony can't be a 0 sum game which useful idiots of the secular kind uphold as some enlightened ideal while denying history and sacrificing truth at the altar. 

 

British didn't divide any more than what divisions already existed, it's not like this place was some syncretic utopia before them. ISI is also telling you that oil and water can't mix so they inhabit reality and are reminding you of it which the secular fabulists here still want to deny in all their ignorance. More politicians have ruled using the sham of secular harmony and ganga jamuni tehzeeb btw than the Bollywood trope which was used to indoctrinate low iq gullible idiots like you that it is the 'politicians who do it'. Even pakistanis are not so dumb as to say this when not faced with a camera.

If we are peaceful then it's probably worth keeping it that way i think, sticking your head in the sand to virtue signal and gain 'good citizen points' when it contradicts reality and history is a surefire way to lead to another partition which for some reason certain people either forget happened or deny the reasons why it happened. Yet they want to indignantly engage in low iq rhetorical gymnastics and dishonest emotionalism lol.

Lol ask this moron how come hindus demography changed in mamalapura, maldah and sambalpur. How hindis has been thrown out of those place overnight by his jihadis fans. If we dint had evidence of live victim of kashmir exodus moron like him would have denied anything like that have ever hpppened. 

Edited November 6 by raki05

[raki05]

On 11/4/2025 at 6:34 AM, straighttalk said:

What is the fault of Indian Muslims or even Pakistani Muslims as long as they are not committing terrorism violence or breaking laws. Their culture is different...as long as they dont bring sharia and try to impose their illiberal views I don't have a problem with their existence.  I have never seen a Muslim in India trying to force Hindus to follow their customs..there is segregation and the worst that has happened is riots and violence with blame on both sides. .most normal Hindus and Muslims stays away from such violence.

Lol what happened yo kaahmir, mamlapur, malda and shambalpur… just because you put your head in sand doesnt mean these events never happened. Was it terrorist who caused hindu exodus from these cities.

[raki05]

6 hours ago, pramodk said:

https://sports.ndtv.com/hockey/amid-bccis-asia-cup-row-hockey-india-takes-opposite-no-handshake-stance-9574416

 

Some of the greatest men of our times Mahatma Ghandhi, Nelson Mandela and Martin Luther King chose peace and reconciliation and were killed and jailed for their stance.

 

I wonder what is the best stance , to show the Pakistani establishment what they did was wrong in all spheres of our interaction...and stand with the innocent people who got killed...(Non violently, like no shake hands).  

 

I think we should support the great Pakistanis like Imran Khan, who wants to do good but jailed ... because the military establishment in Pakistan wants to promote their power and extremely bad policies that has already killed their own country financially, politically and directing the population  to another direction, India..as if India is at fault.It's not religion, it's power politics of the worst kind...  

 

Pooky alert… great pakistani taliban khan lol.

[straighttalk]

On 11/5/2025 at 2:37 PM, Ranvir said:

The problem I have is that they demanded Pakistan and Bangladesh and used violence for their cause but they left 1/3 of their population in India whereas the number of non muslims in their country is small in comparison.

 

Would they ever allow a Hindu or Sikh equivalent of Shah Rukh Khan in their countries? But they expect liberalism in India.

Who are they? If you mean Muslims..you are equating Muslims who left India and Muslims who decided to stay back. I have zero tolerance for religious intolerance...and I hate intolerant people of any religion. So to those fundamentalist Muslims I don't have much sympathy but if you are a Muslim minding your own business and not indulging in anti national activity...I do not support targeting or ostracizing innocent people just for their religion or actions of Paksitanis.

[straighttalk]

On 11/6/2025 at 1:14 AM, raki05 said:

Lol what happened yo kaahmir, mamlapur, malda and shambalpur… just because you put your head in sand doesnt mean these events never happened. Was it terrorist who caused hindu exodus from these cities.

What happened to Kashmir and  Malda in terms of demographics after Independence. If you mean terrorism and Pandit genocide or illegal immigration .did I support them. Absolutely get those terrorists, deport illegals and stop border crossing.... And if you mean exodus...care to share when these areas became Muslim majority.  

 

You are equating white flight type of phenomenon with forceful eviction...Muslims in India are generally poor plus their unique culture is different from Hindus. For these reasons many Hindus leave those areas for greener pastures. It is why many small sections or cities are predominantly Muslims and typically poor.. Well to do Muslims are a miniscule minority in better sections of the city. This is obviously a generalization and I am sure there are instances that contradict it but that's my general observation.

[raki05]

22 minutes ago, straighttalk said:

What happened to Kashmir and  Malda in terms of demographics after Independence. If you mean terrorism and Pandit genocide or illegal immigration .did I support them. Absolutely get those terrorists, deport illegals and stop border crossing.... And if you mean exodus...care to share when these areas became Muslim majority.  

 

You are equating white flight type of phenomenon with forceful eviction...Muslims in India are generally poor plus their unique culture is different from Hindus. For these reasons many Hindus leave those areas for greener pastures. It is why many small sections or cities are predominantly Muslims and typically poor.. Well to do Muslims are a miniscule minority in better sections of the city. This is obviously a generalization and I am sure there are instances that contradict it but that's my general observation.

Are you blind or just woke up yday…. How mosque been used by muslims to sing-slogan in kashmir that hindus leave state by morning and leave your wives and daughter bitta karata a kshmiri who killed 18 hindus by himself. Blind libus like you always believe that panduts weee left by tgeir own will and due to terrorist wheras most of the killing, rape was done  by resident Kashmiri by their own admission. Bitta himself admited he killed many of his hindu friend.Regarding malda and mushidabad watch this video, if we dont have evidence moron like you will keep giving pass to jihadi kaum free pass by calling them poor and innocent whereas make everyday  hue and cry for individual incident wheee muslims got victim of hate crime