Jump to content

As Rinku Singh's 2nd biggest fan, it pains me to say this, but it's time


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, cricspirit said:

 

 

Agreed. 

 

My concern is keeper Battter.

 

I do not trust Kishan or Sanju for any length of time.

 

They have consistency and keeping issues. 

 

I prefer Ishan over Samson. Ishan has shown he can handle tough situations the way he hammered Pak bowlers in 2023 Asia Cup alongside Pandya and pulled India from a tricky situation. Ishan can also go big. Samson can't do much. If none of these are played then the best bet (my preferred option) is to get Jaiswal in as opener and play Jitesh lower down the order. Jaiswal-Abhishek combo would be ideal as an opener and if Ishan can perform the way he's doing over the last few matches, that would be a big help.

Posted
2 hours ago, tapandrun said:

On average Pak batters have better sr vs off-spin compared to LA orthodox.

yes but they have 3 LHBs in their top 7, Saim, Nawaz and Faheem. Saim and Faheem have been in good form recently.

 

I am no big fan of Sundar in this format, just that he may work in Premadasa, huge ground dimensions and sluggish, turning pitch. Besides he is a decent PP bowler, Kuldeep isn't. And last thing I want is to waste Chakri's overs in PP. Chakri and KD should operate in tandem in middle overs to break the back of Pook batting. 

Posted

Rinku singh has been toothless, he is a gun fielder, but except fielding, he doesnt add much value, Washington has played some good T20 innings and can bowl, Washington is a clutch player. 

Posted (edited)
15 hours ago, Sean Bradley said:

Rinku singh has been toothless, he is a gun fielder, but except fielding, he doesnt add much value, Washington has played some good T20 innings and can bowl, Washington is a clutch player. 

Rinku's current form is a big concern.  Should be dropped, IMO.  But Washington has never been a clutch player in any form of whiteball cricket, despite endless opportunities.  His batting reminds me of H Vihari.  No strike rotation, no big hits. Basically, stroke less wonder.  His bowling doesn't inspire any confidence either.  Lastly, he is the worst fielder Ind has ever produced.  

Edited by Frustrated
Posted

Iyer's return to intl cricket (in that ODI series vs NZ) would probably count among the most disastrous returns in recent times. (This, despite the flat pattas).  No way he should be replacing rinku or anyone else. He needs to play domestics first.  Unfortunately, we hv very limited options as rinku's replacement.  

Posted
On 2/13/2026 at 3:28 PM, Sooda said:

We missed a trick by not trying Vipraj Nigam several months ago. Unique profile as a leggie who can hit the ball hard coming in at 8

he is another googly bowler,rarely bowls leg spin if at all ,similar to Bishnoi.

Posted
32 minutes ago, The Realist said:

Rinku or Rahul? :pop2:

 

Pick your poison 

Rahul without any shadow of doubt.This bozo has costed India lot of tournaments.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...