maniac Posted March 31 Author Posted March 31 20 minutes ago, tapandrun said: T20 batting have evolved astronomically but bowling has not, bowlers needs x-factor need to have lot of brains with ability. Some have to understand that getting a cheap over is also a big win in large scheme of things. They need to pre-empt the batters. all X factor bowlers are non- conventional bowlers. Bumrah, Rashid Khan, Usman Tariq, Varun C etc etc. don’t see too many orthodox bowlers succeed in T20s. Even Rabada and Cummins get smacked in T20. Starc and even Shaheen brought that X factor when they were hitting 150 with swing because a left armer + 150 clicks + skills becomes a weapon automatically and is very rare. When they dropped pace, when they looked ordinary. tapandrun 1
vvvslaxman Posted March 31 Posted March 31 56 minutes ago, maniac said: all X factor bowlers are non- conventional bowlers. Bumrah, Rashid Khan, Usman Tariq, Varun C etc etc. don’t see too many orthodox bowlers succeed in T20s. Even Rabada and Cummins get smacked in T20. Starc and even Shaheen brought that X factor when they were hitting 150 with swing because a left armer + 150 clicks + skills becomes a weapon automatically and is very rare. When they dropped pace, when they looked ordinary. Even in ODIs bowlers rendered useless on good batting surfaces. In T20 bowelrs hardly get time to warm themselves up. They get 1 or 2 over spell. THey have to hit the strap right away against guys who are ready to take you down. But that is the same for both teams. So in T20 balancing your side is very very vital. That is where you win games. Top heavy batting, too long a tail, too many right handers, same type of bowlers.. Bowlers are supposed to go for runs in a 20 over game. That is the rule. We can't expect 4 overs 16 runs even from Bumrah. Bumrah 's spell of 4 overs 33 runs in the semi final is still hailed as one of the finest T20 spell in a world cup match. Long back that spell would have been considered expensive.
tapandrun Posted March 31 Posted March 31 11 sixes by pk vs 3 by gt. Gt has -- Rabada , Rashid, Siraj, Krishna Suhaan 1
Suhaan Posted March 31 Posted March 31 3 hours ago, tapandrun said: 11 sixes by pk vs 3 by gt. Gt has -- Rabada , Rashid, Siraj, Krishna Okay batting vs poor batting Even with a good bowling attack, you have to bowl exceptionally well to defend a score in the 160s nowadays,unless you're playing on wornout or typical BD wickets
tapandrun Posted March 31 Posted March 31 18 minutes ago, Suhaan said: Okay batting vs poor batting Even with a good bowling attack, you have to bowl exceptionally well to defend a score in the 160s nowadays,unless you're playing on wornout or typical BD wickets Pk is good batting side, they just lost 3 wkts fr nothing Jansen is playing at 8 and Bartlett at 9 would say a strong batting order in IPL terms. They need to remove Nehal he will create pressure in middle order , they have multiple options they can replace him with. Manucrick 1
Recommended Posts