mishra Posted June 1 Posted June 1 On 5/31/2026 at 12:39 AM, Tillu said: What is this list? Is it in last 20 30 years. Imran Lara richard Gavaskar, where are they?
Gollum Posted June 1 Posted June 1 2 minutes ago, mishra said: What is this list? Is it in last 20 30 years. Imran Lara richard Gavaskar, where are they? This century. mishra 1
vvvslaxman Posted June 1 Posted June 1 On 5/30/2026 at 6:00 PM, coffee_rules said: Kallis is a stats padder of the Dravid mold , stacking up useless 100s and 5fers, somebody who has never him on play will read statsguru and vote him greatest cricketer of the century Dravid was not a statpadder though. His knocks were meaningful knocks. Especially deliverin gin both innings was something he was good at. Twin century in a tight win against pakistan at the eden gardens, 81 & 68 on an unplayable kingston surface, 233 & 72 at adelaide oval, cricspirit and Lone Wolf 2
vvvslaxman Posted June 1 Posted June 1 4 hours ago, BacktoCricaddict said: Or played more than 50% of their international cricket post-2000. Yea Laxman had just started in the late 90s
Gollum Posted June 1 Posted June 1 Kallis has 23 MOTMs in tests, and 9 MOTS But but but statpadder saaaar. Indian fans are so salty. Bigg Brother and cricspirit 2
deathmonger Posted June 1 Author Posted June 1 5 hours ago, Sandz said: Interestingly, there are no Pakistani players. Not even 1. Not even 1 in the teams of the decade awards ICC released. Tbh don't think they will make it in the 2030s either.
vvvslaxman Posted June 1 Posted June 1 1 hour ago, deathmonger said: Not even 1 in the teams of the decade awards ICC released. Tbh don't think they will make it in the 2030s either. True regression started with more cameras and neutral umpires put in place
deathmonger Posted June 1 Author Posted June 1 16 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: By the way is it for all formats? yes
Gollum Posted June 1 Posted June 1 1 hour ago, deathmonger said: Not even 1 in the teams of the decade awards ICC released. Tbh don't think they will make it in the 2030s either. Can't wait to see their impending irrelevance in this sport. Sadly Indo-Pak games in ICC/ACC tourneys are keeping them afloat. Need to pull the plug on that as well. cricspirit and Lone Wolf 2
vvvslaxman Posted June 1 Posted June 1 7 minutes ago, deathmonger said: yes Davy warner has a shot then. He averages 45 in Tests and ODIs. Played over 100 internationals in each format.
Gollum Posted June 1 Posted June 1 3 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: Davy warner has a shot then. He averages 45 in Tests and ODIs. Played over 100 internationals in each format. And a T20 legend. 2 WCs, 1 WTC, 1 T20 WC. ATG tapandrun and vvvslaxman 2
BacktoCricaddict Posted June 1 Posted June 1 (edited) 1 hour ago, deathmonger said: yes And therein lies the major problem. They are such different sports needing different skill-sets; plus the guys who played early on could excel only in 1-2 but not 3 formats. Just makes for a fun discussion - nothing more than that. The only way to do this well is to separate formats. Some guys will end up on all 3, some only in 1 or 2. And that should be acceptable. And Pakistan may still end up with none. And that's just tadka on the dal. Edited June 1 by BacktoCricaddict
deathmonger Posted June 1 Author Posted June 1 2 hours ago, Gollum said: Can't wait to see their impending irrelevance in this sport. Sadly Indo-Pak games in ICC/ACC tourneys are keeping them afloat. Need to pull the plug on that as well. Boomers still live in the old age. But the lack of competition and Indians losing interest (and not wanting to be associated with them) will mean even this ends in a decade.
tapandrun Posted June 1 Posted June 1 (edited) Not sure how this list was made bt sure kallis will be 1 cricketer -- Bowled fast, can bat days and v.v.good slip fielder. 10K+ runs in both Odis and Test and 275+ wkts in both test and odis when he had played with a lot of wkt taking bowlers. If it was All 3 formats then warner has to on the top. Had KP played for more he would have been top 10-15, and cricket may have been diff, do not think these anchor kind of role would have been appreciated this much Edited June 1 by tapandrun
coffee_rules Posted June 1 Posted June 1 5 hours ago, Gollum said: Kallis has 23 MOTMs in tests, and 9 MOTS But but but statpadder saaaar. Indian fans are so salty. Nobody is denying stats, and you are quoting the same. Don’t just read scorecard of yesteryears , but look into quality of runs
vvvslaxman Posted June 1 Posted June 1 5 minutes ago, coffee_rules said: Nobody is denying stats, and you are quoting the same. Don’t just read scorecard of yesteryears , but look into quality of runs Mahela played 31% of his tests on two grounds and made 44% of his test runs there. Has poor average in all 4 SENA countries. coffee_rules 1
deathmonger Posted June 2 Author Posted June 2 Not a bad list. Omissions would be Warner who was great in all three formats, Jadeja who was a cheat code in home tests and pretty decent away and in white ball and Amla who was good in both ODIs and tests and had a really good test run between 2010-12, doing well in all three of Eng, Aus and Ind. tapandrun and Stan AF 2
tapandrun Posted June 2 Posted June 2 2 hours ago, deathmonger said: Not a bad list. Omissions would be Warner who was great in all three formats, Jadeja who was a cheat code in home tests and pretty decent away and in white ball and Amla who was good in both ODIs and tests and had a really good test run between 2010-12, doing well in all three of Eng, Aus and Ind. KP , warner and gayle are true 3 format players
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now