Vk1 Posted June 27 Posted June 27 Not sure Patidar is a better option as he has the support of Flower/Bobat etc at RCB.
Manucrick Posted June 27 Author Posted June 27 34 minutes ago, Vk1 said: Not sure Patidar is a better option as he has the support of Flower/Bobat etc at RCB. Why bring an outsider into the T20 setup as captain when Sanju or Ishan are better options Vaibhav should have replaced SKY in the XI with Ishan captaining and Sanju as vice-captain. That’s the perfect setup but the selectors failed again
Frustrated Posted June 27 Posted June 27 (edited) Damn sure SKY must hv watched our humiliation last night, including his replacement (Iyer's) comedy batting against mighty Ireland. His reaction would hv been Edited June 27 by Frustrated Manucrick 1
The Realist Posted June 27 Posted June 27 Iyer has loser vibes. There is no way Punjab should have choked in IPL after such a strong start. Based on evidence so far has no plan B and seems to wilt in pressure situations. And he's old. Frustrated and Manucrick 2
vvvslaxman Posted June 27 Posted June 27 3 hours ago, Manucrick said: Iyer is tactically a dumb captain Should have brought him purely as a player and see how he goes. Same way appointing TIlak varma as vice captain was another dumb move. VC is probably on the surface is an unimportant role. But when captain goes out of commission during the match he has to take over. We saw what a disaster it was during SA series when Pant captained. He lost a completely winnable match which we were bossing. Manucrick 1
Suhaan Posted June 27 Posted June 27 Sarpuncture has given glaring punctures to this bulldozer T20 outfit New guy 1
Ultimate_Game Posted June 27 Posted June 27 22 hours ago, Lord said: No it was not. Samson captain and Vaibhav in and we would be winning Vaibhav should've played in place of one of the openers. He's not a middle order bat.
vvvslaxman Posted June 27 Posted June 27 The dismissal shot was not a natural shot for Shreyas iyer. It wasmore like under pressure shot. His go to areas are mostly down the ground if it is within the stumps. Walking right across the ball means he was trying to manufacture a shot. Captaincy pressure? In terms of luck and being practical SKY is better than Iyer. If Iyer needs to compensate for that he has to show up in batting. Very reason Iyer replaced SKY was due to his batting. If returns are simialr to SKY , Gill will soon take over which is the last thing i want. Gill totally ruin the mentality by stacking the side with average batsmen so that he can look good.
Manucrick Posted June 27 Author Posted June 27 3 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: The dismissal shot was not a natural shot for Shreyas iyer. It wasmore like under pressure shot. His go to areas are mostly down the ground if it is within the stumps. Walking right across the ball means he was trying to manufacture a shot. Captaincy pressure? In terms of luck and being practical SKY is better than Iyer. If Iyer needs to compensate for that he has to show up in batting. Very reason Iyer replaced SKY was due to his batting. If returns are simialr to SKY , Gill will soon take over which is the last thing i want. Gill totally ruin the mentality by stacking the side with average batsmen so that he can look good. If iyer play like this gill returns won't be far
Lord Posted June 27 Posted June 27 3 hours ago, Ultimate_Game said: Vaibhav should've played in place of one of the openers. He's not a middle order bat. Samson at 3 Manucrick and Ultimate_Game 2
New guy Posted June 28 Posted June 28 16 hours ago, Vk1 said: Not sure Patidar is a better option as he has the support of Flower/Bobat etc at RCB. Why would patidar be even an option? Why are you guys looking at options outside of already players who won us the world cup? Its weird iyer cult keeps bringing up Patidar as a gotcha. I see this propaganda online, as if iyer can only he replaced by Patidar and these are the only optoons we can have and its obvious dishonesty. Ishan, samson, etc can be captain without changing our wolrd cup winning team much Manucrick and Vk1 2
New guy Posted June 28 Posted June 28 9 hours ago, Lord said: Samson at 3 Yep, samson can easily play in middle order and replace tilak or iyer Lord and Manucrick 2
Manucrick Posted June 28 Author Posted June 28 1 hour ago, New guy said: Why would patidar be even an option? Why are you guys looking at options outside of already players who won us the world cup? Its weird iyer cult keeps bringing up Patidar as a gotcha. I see this propaganda online, as if iyer can only he replaced by Patidar and these are the only optoons we can have and its obvious dishonesty. Ishan, samson, etc can be captain without changing our wolrd cup winning team much Iyer or patidar not needed
Manucrick Posted June 28 Author Posted June 28 Iyer fans are hiding i still remember some guys from icf where so happy when iyer announced as captain where is those people Frustrated 1
vvvslaxman Posted June 28 Posted June 28 4 minutes ago, Lord said: PBKs fans right now Trust me. I always thought Punjab had a great unit. But one thing that always concerned me was how they look helpless while being on the field. SRH with bowlers sakeb, hinge, shivang, maling looked way better than janswen, arshdeep, chahal, bartlett. On paper first line up is terrible.
Lord Posted June 28 Posted June 28 2 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said: Trust me. I always thought Punjab had a great unit. But one thing that always concerned me was how they look helpless while being on the field. SRH with bowlers sakeb, hinge, shivang, maling looked way better than janswen, arshdeep, chahal, bartlett. On paper first line up is terrible. There was a narrative by Punjab fans that bowling was poor and Iyer couldnt do anything. Even though attack is good on paper..
vvvslaxman Posted June 28 Posted June 28 1 minute ago, Lord said: There was a narrative by Punjab fans that bowling was poor and Iyer couldnt do anything. Even though attack is good on paper.. you can't blame active internatioal bowlers if you can't get the best out of them. Lord 1
Bigg Brother Posted June 28 Posted June 28 Bubble bursted in the first outing. Sky was A level minnow basher and also has hundred in SA,NZ and England in T20s which is huge thing. Having said that Sky's time was over, had become one shot specialist. Iyer has a long way to go in T20s. There is a reason why he wasn't in squad of 15. tapandrun and Manucrick 2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now