Vijay.Sharma Posted June 22, 2011 Share Posted June 22, 2011 haha, the comedy continues. I haven't misinterpreted anything. It's you who doesn't know what I am talking about. FTR, I have no interest in your dumb analysis. :--DSo, why not share the data? Link to comment
Roshanrocks Posted June 22, 2011 Share Posted June 22, 2011 So' date=' why not share the data?[/quote'] Oh dont bother... First he will give u stats... then when u give him counter-stats he will throw in 2-3 sentences of how intelligent he is and how dumb others are with words such as comedy, dumb, stupid included in there as well as a few smileys. Link to comment
mishra Posted June 22, 2011 Share Posted June 22, 2011 haha, the comedy continues. I haven't misinterpreted anything. It's you who doesn't know what I am talking about. FTR, I have no interest in your dumb analysis. :--D We love cricket. We understand cricket. Our understanding isnt based on statsguru. We dont watch cricket on espncricinfo live scorecard...Our understanding is based on the way batsman bats.We see it. Dravid is most elegant batsman in the history of cricket. But we love Sachin. Why.... Because he hits the ball just a fraction of second before any other batsman will do.beacuse Ball doesnt beat his bat. Sachin allways reaches the ball. Runs, records, centuries all, are bi product... What we really love is his batting. His dominance... Teams pre plan against Sachin. Not with only plan A, But plan B, and plan C. And still at this age he is most prized indian wicket for any bowler.... BCCI is what it is today because of Sachin... His impact change the dynamics of world cricket.. Do hell with what all time greats say....Just becauase they dont vote Murali doesnt mean Murali isnt great.. ( Murali is not even in the all time great list. Warne is at 4th...Even Fuddu Laker is is in top 50...) I dont want you to agree, Sachin is best. IF cricket greats can be biased why cant someone like you .. frankly , I dont care... But please please please....Understand one thing... If you cant take others opinion seriously others may start doing the same... Link to comment
zen Posted June 22, 2011 Share Posted June 22, 2011 :hysterical: can't stop laughing at some of the posts here Link to comment
ravishingravi Posted June 22, 2011 Author Share Posted June 22, 2011 :hysterical: Sachin is an idol for me if ever there can be one. But I sure do hope that he does not follow this thread. Thread deserves to take its own course. I honestly cannot keep up with some of the arguments put forth. We are desperate to put him at numero uno arent we. Link to comment
tatters Posted June 22, 2011 Share Posted June 22, 2011 as I have shown in one of my earlier posts that he probably doesn't even average 40 when playing good bowling pairs like iirc Waqar-Wasim' date=' Mcgrath-Warne, Donald-Pollock, etc [/quote'] What stupid analysis. :haha: Link to comment
The Outsider Posted June 22, 2011 Share Posted June 22, 2011 Once again, this argument does not make even an iota of sense because And putting reverse cumulative averages from stats guru showing Richards did not average 50 for most of his career in an alternative world where time runs backwards to conclude he was 'mediocre' makes sense because...............?:hysterical: Link to comment
mishra Posted June 22, 2011 Share Posted June 22, 2011 If someone argues that Chapell came to India with one goal. Take down Sachin so that Bradman can remain at top... It may be difficult to keep up with... But Mike Denness controversy was surely for one and only one reason. White dudes couldnt see Tendulkar taking the number one spot.... So why the hell we cant be obseessed with Tendulkar... I cant google it now but somewhere I read it that Once security guard did not recognise Gavaskar, and did nit let hime enter the cricket ground, probably Lords... Link to comment
Guest BossBhai Posted June 22, 2011 Share Posted June 22, 2011 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
The Outsider Posted June 22, 2011 Share Posted June 22, 2011 If someone argues that Chapell came to India with one goal. Take down Sachin so that Bradman can remain at top... I am sure some people from this thread would be able to find 'stats' to back that up as well. :hatsoff: Link to comment
mishra Posted June 22, 2011 Share Posted June 22, 2011 I am sure some people from this thread would be able to find 'stats' to back that up as well. :hatsoff: Someone/thread were arguing that we won the world cup because of Greg :hatsoff: Link to comment
Sachin=GOD Posted June 22, 2011 Share Posted June 22, 2011 Now that Rett has started spouting venom in this thread, expect the thread to be full of insults & smilieys with absolutely no logic in most of the posts. Link to comment
CSK Fan Posted June 22, 2011 Share Posted June 22, 2011 And putting reverse cumulative averages from stats guru showing Richards did not average 50 for most of his career in an alternative world where time runs backwards to conclude he was 'mediocre' makes sense because...............?:hysterical: I never said it did Link to comment
Guest BossBhai Posted June 22, 2011 Share Posted June 22, 2011 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
CSK Fan Posted June 22, 2011 Share Posted June 22, 2011 Donald and McGrath definitely hold the edge over Tendulkar - you don't need mindless number crunching to demonstrate that if you watch and understand the game. Obviously, it does not detract from what Tendulkar is because they were great bowlers in their own rights and for his part Tendulkar has held the edge over several other great bowlers. . Now this I agree with. Although in his first few years, particularly with donald, Sachin did try to counter-attack Link to comment
Sachin=GOD Posted June 22, 2011 Share Posted June 22, 2011 cant blame others when the mods and admins themselves openly encourage that. :agree: Link to comment
The Outsider Posted June 22, 2011 Share Posted June 22, 2011 I never said it did I misconstrued your silence for acceptance. Link to comment
yoda Posted June 22, 2011 Share Posted June 22, 2011 There is one simple solution folks. Just look at video footage and declare the one who "looks" the best as the winner. If it worked for Bradman vs Sachin, should work for anyone vs anyone else. :winky: All these stats etc are useless as proven by the video footage followers. :hahaha: Link to comment
Guest BossBhai Posted June 22, 2011 Share Posted June 22, 2011 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
mishra Posted June 22, 2011 Share Posted June 22, 2011 All these stats etc are useless as proven by the video footage followers. :hahaha: :facepalm: Richard did not play cricket in stone age..... Video follower have already seen Richards playing too. Not highlights. or you tube videos.... Complete test series. They are not relying on your statsguru.... Why do Coaches watch a player before they select them from a lower league to upper league. Because stats are for guidance only Link to comment
Recommended Posts