Jump to content

A chilling recount of the 1984 riots


DomainK

Recommended Posts

My post is proved correct, Sikhs are indeed raising issues in ENG/CA/USA/OZ. Now can you say my post was c h e w t i y a ? Read Dexter Morgan's post, they are maligning India and Hinduism abroad. Jai Sri Ram.
Let's see... say your sister nd mom are ****d & killed, your brothers nd father burnt alive and the perperators not just enjoying their freedom but thriving. Now you have explored all the avenues legally within the country for redressal and the justice system not only let you down but made a mockery of you. And when you try to put pressure via external agencies on the nation which let you down badly, you are branded as a trouble-maker. How ould you feel then?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My post is proved correct, Sikhs are indeed raising issues in ENG/CA/USA/OZ. Now can you say my post was c h e w t i y a ? Read Dexter Morgan's post, they are maligning India and Hinduism abroad. Jai Sri Ram.
You reap what you sow. As long as there are hindus like you who are more concerned about image and hiding the truth than justice, the massacre against Sikhs will continue to be brought up.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congress people are the worst *******s of the highest order. They never answer abt Sikh riots in any TV debates. They just compare Gujarat riots and blame BJP. Both parties blame each other but neither of them does anything. Really feel bad for Sikh victims. would riots take place in this era? We would never know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1984 riots case to be re-opened against Congress leader Jagdish Tytler

New Delhi: In a big setback for Congress leader Jagdish Tytler, a Delhi court has set aside a closure report of the Central Bureau of Investigation and ordered re-investigation of allegations that the former minister instigated a rioting mob, which murdered three men 29 years ago during the 1984 anti-Sikh riots.
http://www.ndtv.com/article/cheat-sheet/1984-riots-case-to-be-re-opened-against-congress-leader-jagdish-tytler-352329 May justice (though delayed) be done.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing wiil happen. 84 riots were done under full patronage of rajiv ghandhi. Tytler was one of his rotweillers. Tytler has full protection of gandhi clan and congress. CBI acting like his defence lawer. 30 years and no justice. India is a sick joke sometimes Most that will happen is it will show double standard position congress have over modi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1984 riots case to be re-opened against Congress leader Jagdish Tytler http://www.ndtv.com/article/cheat-sheet/1984-riots-case-to-be-re-opened-against-congress-leader-jagdish-tytler-352329 May justice (though delayed) be done.
Nothing will happen. Most of the folks who were the victims have stopped caring about it either - they are too old or dead. For those who are still around the reopening of the case, just like setting up a commission or an enquiry, is a cruel joke where they have to re-live the sordid past and are mocked at once again. There's a reason for the saying "justice delayed is justice denied" and the 1984 riots case can be the poster child for the same.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing will happen. Most of the folks who were the victims have stopped caring about it either - they are too old or dead. For those who are still around the reopening of the case, just like setting up a commission or an enquiry, is a cruel joke where they have to re-live the sordid past and are mocked at once again. There's a reason for the saying "justice delayed is justice denied" and the 1984 riots case can be the poster boy for the same.
This
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing will happen. Most of the folks who were the victims have stopped caring about it either - they are too old or dead. For those who are still around the reopening of the case, just like setting up a commission or an enquiry, is a cruel joke where they have to re-live the sordid past and are mocked at once again. There's a reason for the saying "justice delayed is justice denied" and the 1984 riots case can be the poster child for the same.
Delayed justice is better than no justice.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rajiv Gandhi was the main man behind the 1984 riots, the likes of Tytler/Bhagat/Sajjan Kumar were just his chamchas who led the bloodthirsty mobs to kill and rape Sikhs. And the irony is that this Mass Murderer is a Bharat Ratna and regularly gets glorified in newspapers as some visionary who has sacrificed his life for the Nation. Even if Tytel gets hanged in the future ( which is very unlikely ) I wont see it as justice for the Sikhs since the main man has passed away without any accountability and punishment .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rajiv Gandhi was the main man behind the 1984 riots, the likes of Tytler/Bhagat/Sajjan Kumar were just his chamchas who led the bloodthirsty mobs to kill and rape Sikhs. And the irony is that this Mass Murderer is a Bharat Ratna and regularly gets glorified in newspapers as some visionary who has sacrificed his life for the Nation. Even if Tytel gets hanged in the future ( which is very unlikely ) I wont see it as justice for the Sikhs since the main man has passed away without any accountability and punishment .
yep
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And guess what happened after this massacare by Congress ? In the 1984 elections held after the assassination of Indira Gandhi , the people of India voted en masses in favour of Congress which won a convincing 80% seats in the parliament and Rajiv Gandhi took over as the PM of the country . And then we have people who talk about " Death of Secularism " , " Flawed Democracy " , " Ashamed to be an Indian " in case Modi becomes the PM of the country as if previously India had a 100% clean track record of electing saints as PM . Modi is actually a lesser evil compared to Shree Bharat Ratna Rajiv Gandhi , the only difference is that the former has been exposed by the media while the latter hasnt .
Why is it after riots and gruesome violence voters favor the incumbents who governed during the riots? The mere fact there there were riots during their tenure is evidence of their inability to govern rit?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is it after riots and gruesome violence voters favor the incumbents who governed during the riots? The mere fact there there were riots during their tenure is evidence of their inability to govern rit?
That, unfortunately, shows the mindset of Indian citizens in general. My statement will not be accepted well, but Indian citizens have some serious issues. 1984 is not the only travesty that was not only easily digested by the citizens of this country, but was subsequently supported and justified by the voters. The callousness, the stubbornness, the lack of sympathy and the general attitude of offense towards anyone outside a community is scary and shows why we struggle to progress as a nation.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That' date=' unfortunately, shows the mindset of Indian citizens in general. My statement will not be accepted well, but Indian citizens have some serious issues. 1984 is not the only travesty that was not only easily digested by the citizens of this country, but was subsequently supported and justified by the voters. The callousness, the stubbornness, the lack of sympathy and the general attitude of righteous offense towards anyone outside a community is scary and shows why we struggle to progress as a nation.[/quote'] True. That however does not answer the question why Congress won in 1984. Answer is, Congress should have won. They were the biggest party. Sikh killings happened in a few city. There was an assasination of resident Indian PM, a PM that was pretty well liked across India(at the time). So there was a sympathy factor. Opposition parties were piece of cr@p. yada yada Surprised how some people are wondering why Congress won. Congress would have won in 1984 regardless of the killings in Delhi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

True. That however does not answer the question why Congress won in 1984. Answer is, Congress should have won. They were the biggest party. Sikh killings happened in a few city. There was an assasination of resident Indian PM, a PM that was pretty well liked across India(at the time). So there was a sympathy factor. Opposition parties were piece of cr@p. yada yada Surprised how some people are wondering why Congress won. Congress would have won in 1984 regardless of the killings in Delhi
Congress should not have won after the riots. It's sad that people still voted for Congress, showing political parties exactly what they can all easily get away with. Sympathy should never be a criteria for voting, but in India, it is. Similarly, most other parameters are just wrong. The fact that Congress won the elections in spite of the fresh riots shows how idiotic our voters are.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why will they not raise issues when the perpetrators behind these acts are still roaming free? And why not internationally when India has failed to convict many of these criminals even after 30 odd years? And whats the point of saying Jai Sri Ram apart from pretending your position is a hindu position, when it is obviously not so?
+1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless There is supreme court monitored investigation,this investigations will go nowhere .CBI director who did not allow the case firstly to be registered against tytler even though the officers wanted is now governer.I hope oneday CBI ,Police have some sort of independence .It will solve lot many problems of violence ,corruption in the country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...