Speeds and Performances of Pacers and Spinners

[Nikhil_cric]

2 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

Early 130's but excellent channel bowling.

I think speed guns are bit toned down.

I love what this guy brings to the Table.

Closest we have to someone like Green or Woakes.

I'd pick him eyes closed for that Perth Test.  He is my 4th pacer.

The speeds look accurate to me. But yeah watching him bowl to KL and he's bowling such a good line and length., better than main seamers. Easy and effortless run up to the crease too, very lithe. 

 

More than good enough for a batting allrounder. 

 

 

 

 

[Manucrick]

5 minutes ago, Nikhil_cric said:

Arshdeep can clock upto 144 kph but he can't sustain and it takes a lot out of him. 

When he bowl that I seen most of the matches that he played 

[Lone Wolf]

Himanshu losing the plot this inns nahi yar 

[Nikhil_cric]

1 minute ago, Manucrick said:

When he bowl that I seen most of the matches that he played 

Maybe 2 years ago. 

[rkt.india]

6 minutes ago, Manucrick said:

If u compare Mukesh with avesh khaleel bhuvi arshdeep he bigger than them 

Mukesh is 5 foot 8-9. Avesh khaleel are 6'2. Arshdeep 6'3

[singhvivek141]

4 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

Himanshu losing the plot this inns nahi yar 

No worries, he is still in his first year of domestics. Will learn from this experience.

[Lone Wolf]

Dayal definitely better option than Khaleel and Arshdeep for ODIs 

[Manucrick]

1 minute ago, rkt.india said:

Mukesh is 5 foot 8-9. Avesh khaleel are 6'2. Arshdeep 6'3

I am not talking about tall brother he looking stronger than them. And do you remember pankaj singh that guy is so tall and bowl 132k 

[putrevus]

6 hours ago, rkt.india said:

Siraj has not lost any pace. Even in the last series, he was bowling 145.

Touching 145 once does not make him bowling at that speed, he was bowling mostly in low 130s.

[singhvivek141]

1 hour ago, Manucrick said:

If u compare Mukesh with avesh khaleel bhuvi arshdeep he bigger than them 

Mukesh is short in height hence looks stocky.

 

Bowlers who are taller with a lean physique looks thinner than then counterpart who are short in height.

 

Akashdeep & Shami have same build, Akashdeep is around 6 while Shami is just 5.9...Shami looks stockier in comparison to Akashdeep. 

 

Bhuvi is a specimen like this Thakre guy. 

[JaFanatic]

1 hour ago, Lone Wolf said:

Saini has lost few ks but he is still a 140k quick & better than likes of Avesh Mukesh.

High arm action too

Understandable he's in his 30s

[Suhaan]

2 hours ago, Manucrick said:

I got your point his not that useful in subcontinent or Australia in 50 or test, I just said he better than avesh mukesh khaleel 

I agree he's better than Khaleel and Mukesh

[tapandrun]

7 hours ago, express bowling said:

 

Bro, Harshit has been 5 k to 12 k quicker then the other Indian pacers on view. Plus he has looked as skilful as any other.

 

It is a travesty that he did not get to play in Zimbabwe and Sri Lanka a few months ago.

 

Shows how poor we are in spotting pace bowling talent.

Is there anything to do with IPL retention of uncapped player ???

[Need4Speed]

9 hours ago, express bowling said:

 

Bro, Harshit has been 5 k to 12 k quicker then the other Indian pacers on view. Plus he has looked as skilful as any other.

 

It is a travesty that he did not get to play in Zimbabwe and Sri Lanka a few months ago.

 

Shows how poor we are in spotting pace bowling talent.

no..the talent is already spotted..they are rigid in their approach..fkin seniority queue..look at Bangladesh..where is seniority queue for Nahid Rana..

[express bowling]

4 minutes ago, Need4Speed said:

no..the talent is already spotted..they are rigid in their approach..fkin seniority queue..look at Bangladesh..where is seniority queue for Nahid Rana..

 

Listen to the commentary in domestic cricket.

 

They were so excited about Aditya Thakre. Saying that 120 k pacers can be very effective as batters are early in their shots. And he is so accurate.

 

While they were most angry about Harshit Rana, even when he was taking wickets. Except Malhotra, who praised him a lot. 

 

When Mukesh was getting hit for 4s regularly, they said that the balls are not bad but getting hit. 

 

And these are the guys who become selectors. 

[singhvivek141]

7 minutes ago, express bowling said:

 

Listen to the commentary in domestic cricket.

 

They were so excited about Aditya Thakre. Saying that 120 k pacers can be very effective as batters are early in their shots. And he is so accurate.

 

While they were most angry about Harshit Rana, even when he was taking wickets. Except Malhotra, who praised him a lot. 

 

When Mukesh was getting hit for 4s regularly, they said that the balls are not bad but getting hit. 

 

And these are the guys who become selectors. 

Spot on!

They kept on hyping Arshdeep, Mukesh despite their lack of pace. Mukesh was giving width and in process was getting smashed for fours.

Harshit was pitching between good length & back of length with few bouncers at a considerable accuracy...morons like Ajay Mehra were blaming him for the lack of swing and saying that he shouldn't be afraid to pitch the ball up and allow to swing.

 

I am surprised despite seeing success of Shami & Bumrah for so many years, why do they want another Bhuvaneshwar Kumar ? Where is their cricketing acumen ?

[Suhaan]

33 minutes ago, express bowling said:

 

Listen to the commentary in domestic cricket.

 

They were so excited about Aditya Thakre. Saying that 120 k pacers can be very effective as batters are early in their shots. And he is so accurate.

 

While they were most angry about Harshit Rana, even when he was taking wickets. Except Malhotra, who praised him a lot. 

 

When Mukesh was getting hit for 4s regularly, they said that the balls are not bad but getting hit. 

 

And these are the guys who become selectors. 

There should be 140+ kph quota in XIs

[Suhaan]

23 minutes ago, singhvivek141 said:

Spot on!

They kept on hyping Arshdeep, Mukesh despite their lack of pace. Mukesh was giving width and in process was getting smashed for fours.

Harshit was pitching between good length & back of length with few bouncers at a considerable accuracy...morons like Ajay Mehra were blaming him for the lack of swing and saying that he shouldn't be afraid to pitch the ball up and allow to swing.

 

I am surprised despite seeing success of Shami & Bumrah for so many years, why do they want another Bhuvaneshwar Kumar ? Where is their cricketing acumen ?

Actually there knowledge is limited to swing,full deliveries,cover drives,achi gendo ka samman etc

These dumpsters dihati ex cricketers even the recently retired ones ,don't know anything beyond that

Natural length of every individual bowler,seam, biomechanics,reverse ,pacing your spells during various junctures of game

These bkls are like automated machines which are programmed to vomit this nonsense since 1934

[Need4Speed]

44 minutes ago, express bowling said:

 

Listen to the commentary in domestic cricket.

 

They were so excited about Aditya Thakre. Saying that 120 k pacers can be very effective as batters are early in their shots. And he is so accurate.

 

While they were most angry about Harshit Rana, even when he was taking wickets. Except Malhotra, who praised him a lot. 

 

When Mukesh was getting hit for 4s regularly, they said that the balls are not bad but getting hit. 

 

And these are the guys who become selectors. 

Whaaat..they are angry on Harshit..wth..ky ch..appa hai..for that matter Harshit was accurate too..

[singhvivek141]

3 minutes ago, Need4Speed said:

Whaaat..they are angry on Harshit..wth..ky ch..appa hai..for that matter Harshit was accurate too..

He wasn't pitching the ball full and trying to swing in the air.