Ingerland, O Ingerland :rofl::rofl::rofl:

[10DuLKaR]

Lets see.. * If that goal was given, 4-2 * If Lampard's free kick hadnt hit the bar, 4-3 * If Rooney had scored on that fabulous chance he got, 4-4 :hysterical: They had their chances, they ****ed it up, they are themselves to be blamed. :icflove:

[Desi Cartman]

[Don Sharma]

As much as I agree that going into half-time 2-2 is not same as 2-1, credit should be given where it is due...quite simply Germany was the better team of the two.

[10DuLKaR]

:hysterical:

[yoda]

Lets see.. * If that goal was given, 4-2 * If Lampard's free kick hadnt hit the bar, 4-3 * If Rooney had scored on that fabulous chance he got, 4-4 :hysterical: They had their chances, they ****ed it up, they are themselves to be blamed. :icflove:

not the same * if that goal was given 2-2 * anything could happen from there, not necessarily the way it played out from there on let's face it, these calls and non-calls are making a mockery of this world cup. i don't remember seeing this many bad calls watching prior world cups. some of them have been deciders like the stupid calls/non-calls in Italy's last game.

[10DuLKaR]

^^I agree. This is some *****y Refereeing we are seeing here.. :headshake:

[b555]

hilarious pic desi :hatsoff:

[Serani]

Well......at least our cricket is going in the right direction, **** football.

[gaurav92]

:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:

[Gunner_Mania]

Hysterical, deluded and thoroughly English

England has exited the football World Cup and once again failed to live up to expectations. But why do the English fool themselves, again and again, into believing they can win, and might they actually enjoy it?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/8768122.stm

[CSK Fan]

not the same * if that goal was given 2-2 * anything could happen from there, not necessarily the way it played out from there on let's face it, these calls and non-calls are making a mockery of this world cup. i don't remember seeing this many bad calls watching prior world cups. some of them have been deciders like the stupid calls/non-calls in Italy's last game.

During 1966, in the WC finals Germany and England were tied at 2-2. Then one of the England players hit the cross bar, the ball bounced on the line and came out but was ruled as a goal. England went on to win 4-2 So its just payback time b!tches!!!!! :hysterical:

[yoda]

During 1966' date=' in the WC finals Germany and England were tied at 2-2. Then one of the England players hit the cross bar, the ball bounced on the line and came out [b']but was ruled as a goal. England went on to win 4-2 So its just payback time b!tches!!!!! :hysterical:

Yea, we all know that bit of history now, doesn't change the fact that FIFA is incompetent. Essentially no progress has been made in officiating in 45 years.

[gaurav92]

^Yes Exactly :giggle:

[Guest Hiten.]

Yea, we all know that bit of history now, doesn't change the fact that FIFA is incompetent. Essentially no progress has been made in officiating in 45 years.

Mind you, FIFA will be pocketing 2 billion euros from this competition. So money is certainly not a problem when it comes to implementing technology for "Fair Play" (which FIFA vividly promotes ...****ing irony! :giggle:). I think ICC and FIFA are no different, headed by nincompoops who still light their fire by striking stones :wall:

[ludhianvi]

Regarding the fear of interruption of play, the players argue with the referee for about 30 seconds anyways on these sort of controversial decisions so might as well use the goal line technology. And Fifa also keeps harping about 'Fair Play' so they should surely take this into consideration.

[Gunner_Mania]

Mind you, FIFA will be pocketing 2 billion euros from this competition. So money is certainly not a problem when it comes to implementing technology for "Fair Play" (which FIFA vividly promotes ...****ing irony! :giggle:). I think ICC and FIFA are no different, headed by nincompoops who still light their fire by striking stones :wall:

No. the problem is that this technology is not available when a few villagers play on a sunday morning in one of the villages across UK. FIFA wants to have a level playing field across all games

[Serani]

No. the problem is that this technology is not available when a few villagers play on a sunday morning in one of the villages across UK. FIFA wants to have a level playing field across all games

That argument is so bull, nobody cares about villagers or **** like that.

[Gunner_Mania]

That argument is so bull' date=' nobody cares about villagers or **** like that.[/quote'] sarcasm 101 anybody :hmmm:

[b555]

1 Lost in translation It's not hard to imagine Fabio Capello returning to Italy and, when asked about his experiences in England, uttering the words attributed to Ian Rush after the Welsh striker's unsuccessful year with Juventus: “It was like a foreign country.” Rush never made a serious effort to become fluent in the language of his new home, and neither did Capello. The manager's decision to hide behind the evasions and contradictions produced, even after two and a half years, by his extremely limited English reinforced the impression of unproductive intransigence and made the media wonder whether he was as inarticulate in conversation with his players. No nuances in communication could have led to the unsubtle football we saw from the squad in South Africa. 2 Too many consiglieri When Steve McClaren went to Holland to rebuild his reputation, Sir Bobby Robson gave him one piece of advice that turned out to be very useful: go alone, without your cronies. Capello arrived in England with a battalion of Italian advisers including one, Franco Baldini, whose job seemed to involve putting an arm round the players and leaking information to journalists. This emphasised Capello's remoteness and his unwillingness to establish relationships containing a necessary measure of personal warmth with the members of his squad. He didn't have to be their best friend, but he could have been a caring father-figure. 3 The wrong fig leaf When foreign managers arrive in England, they almost invariably select a home grown assistant: Arsène Wenger has Pat Rice, Gérard Houllier had Phil Thompson, Rafa Benítez had Sammy Lee, José Mourinho and Gianfranco Zola had Steve Clarke and Carlo Ancelotti has Ray Wilkins. Some of those sidekicks play a genuine role but for others the job amounts to little more than providing a fig leaf of ethnic continuity and setting out the cones in training. Clearly Stuart Pearce was the FA's idea rather than Capello's. The manager's lack of respect for his unsuitable assistant has been clear for all to see in a thoroughly embarrassing YouTube clip in which his bullying attitude on the bench appears to say rather too much about the essence of the man. 4 The Capello Index A disastrous miscalculation, its announcement was foolishly timed to do the maximum damage to Capello's authority on the eve of the final. This was much, much worse than any of Sven-Goran Eriksson's extra-curricular commercial adventures because it suggested that he was willing to make a public evaluation of his players' performance for commercial gain. It cost him the respect he had been so freely given and represented the beginning of the end of the reputation burnished by nine victories in the 10 matches of the qualifying campaign. 5 Amending his contract The next clue to his fallibility – perhaps even insincerity – was his decision to ask the FA to remove the contractual clause that allowed either party to sever their agreement after the World Cup, meaning the deal would continue without its unilateral break options through to the finals of Euro 2012. Unnerved by last month's strong suggestion that Massimo Moratti was intent on making Capello the successor to Mourinho at Internazionale in time for the start of next season, the FA caved in - as it did with Eriksson after the Swede's flirtation with Chelsea. Outcome: another disaster whose cost is now entirely dependent on Capello's goodwill. 6 Giving in to panic After losing a handful of players to injury and deciding that others were out of form, Capello unexpectedly panicked in the weeks before the tournament and contacted a couple of disenchanted veterans who had announced their retirement from international football. Paul Scholes said the request had come too late, while Jamie Carragher agreed to help out. This suggested first that Capello's plans had not been as firmly grounded as we had thought, and second that he did not, after all, trust England's admittedly shallow pool of younger players. However rational the calls to Scholes and Carragher may have seemed, they undermined a certain confidence in the manager and the squad. 7 Abandoning Walcott The last-minute decision to discard the player whose hat-trick in Zagreb had bathed the qualifying campaign in a golden glow cast further doubt on the firmness of Capello's judgment and resolve. Theo Walcott, he had insisted repeatedly, was “an important player for the squad”, and an indifferent end to a league season interrupted by injury should have made no difference to the manager's faith in the 21-year-old Arsenal flyer. The list of the members of Sunday's German side who did not shine in Bundesliga last season starts with Miroslav Klose, Lukas Podolski and Thomas Müller: the three goalscorers against England. 8 Concentration camp Brought up in the Italian football culture, Capello has always put his trust in the ritiro: the sequestering of players in an hotel for a day or two before a match. One imagines it suited an ascetic temperament formed in the north-eastern province of Gorizia, his birthplace. Extending the concept to the several weeks of a World Cup campaign, however, proved disastrous. Depriving the players of their wives and girlfriends was one thing; making them feel like the inhabitants of a sensory-deprivation chamber was quite another. Under Eriksson, the players were thought to have been over-indulged. But why should they not at least have been encouraged to enjoy the experience of a World Cup? Here is where the internal resentment of Capello's methods began to take root. 9 Criticising the ball Many players criticised the Jabulani in the early days of the tournament, and Capello was equally forthright, calling it the worst ball he had seen. The fact that he was correct is immaterial. He would have done better to keep his opinion to himself rather than furnishing his players with another potential excuse for failure. “It's a ball,” he should have told them. “Just get on with it.” 10 Castrating John Terry Capello was right to relieve John Terry of the captaincy after the Vanessa Perroncel affair had provoked Wayne Bridge into leaving the squad, but he was wrong not to understand and accept the value of Terry's attempted insurrection between the Algeria and Slovenia games, when the team appeared to be heading for imminent disaster. At the slightest hint of disapproval from above, those members of the squad who had initially supported Terry backed down in a trice and, as the phrase goes, hung their former skipper out to dry. But instead of adhering to his autocratic style in that evening's crucial team meeting, Capello should have drawn out the players' views, however incoherent, listening sympathetically and making them feel as though they had a real part to play in their own destiny rather than treating them as dim robots. Instead he continued to bellow at them from the touchline, his unsightly ranting even less effective, as it turned out, than Eriksson's passivity.

[b555]

Ten things Fabio Capello got wrong