living Posted October 21, 2007 Share Posted October 21, 2007 20 overs instead of 50. Less time for collapses and less time for the bowlers to be fully exposed. But hey' date=' we are the world champions :tounge_smile:[/quote'] ^ I like this one :D Link to comment
Hawkeye Posted October 21, 2007 Share Posted October 21, 2007 Fewer overs reduces the pressure to which Indians so often crumble. 20 overs allows their natural talent to surface. Link to comment
gs Posted October 21, 2007 Share Posted October 21, 2007 Allows the Indian batting filled with strokemakers to play wit unbridled freedom. They dont have to worry about quick singles, strike rotation etc. at which they suck anyways. Instead, they just have to smash the ball from the first over itself, which they are pretty good at. Link to comment
yoda Posted October 21, 2007 Share Posted October 21, 2007 Biggest factor lies in bowling. Not picking up wickets and bowling a strictly defensive line is not a disadvantage in T20. 9, 7, 10, 6, 9, 7, 5, 5 - number of wickets we have picked up in our 20/20s so far. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now