Gillchrist: Murali is a chucker

[King Tendulkar]

More nonsense.

from saint gilly yes

[Donny]

Actually, Sandro, you are wrong, too. :regular_smile: What Lehmann was alleged to have said in the Australian dressing rooms was in post #53.

[King Tendulkar]

Actually, Sandro, you are wrong, too. :regular_smile: What Lehmann was alleged to have said in the Australian dressing rooms was in post #53.

Alleged? So you are not convinced he said anything racist?

[CC1981]

Actually, Sandro, you are wrong, too. What Lehmann was alleged to have said in the Australian dressing rooms was in post #53.

semantics

[CC1981]

Alleged? So you are not convinced he said anything racist?

duh. rhetorical question !! when has donny ever had a prob with an aussie player ??

[Donny]

(Only to paraphrase you, Sandro) duh. Stupid question. One has only to read my (over 2000) posts to know that's also nonsense.

[Willow_on_fire]

Muralitharan has a deformed wrist...and Gilly has a deformed brain...:winky:

[Donny]

And Willow has ......... well, nothing really. :regular_smile:

[King Tendulkar]

Alleged? So you are not convinced he said anything racist?

No answer?

[bharat297]

Actually, Sandro, you are wrong, too. :regular_smile: What Lehmann was alleged to have said in the Australian dressing rooms was in post #53.

:hysterical: Donny you never cease to amuse me ... Because once again ... you are dead wrong. Lehmann pleaded guilty and has admitted he said this. Zing!!!

[Willow_on_fire]

And Willow has ......... well' date=' nothing really. :regular_smile:[/quote'] And donny has a deformed brain too...:--D

[King Tendulkar]

Not content with saying laxman is a walking wicket. Donny now wants to reopen the Lehman racist case as he think he only allegedly said what he pleaded guilty to:hysterical:

[CC1981]

(Only to paraphrase you, Sandro) duh. Stupid question. One has only to read my (over 2000) posts to know that's also nonsense.

Care to show some evidence ? I really cannot remember last time you criticised the conduct or sportsmanship of an Aussie player. PS: Still waiting on the Murali issue. I find it interesting that you refuse to address that point. Perhaps science isnt your forte either ?

[Donny]

Cannot remember ? So you've read all my posts ? I'm impressed. :regular_smile: Actually, the only player who's behaviour I can readily remember criticising, was Shane Watson. Wouldn't surprise me if I had also had a go at that long streak of misery from England, Steve Harmison. I have openly criticised McCullum, Gilchrist, Prior, Akmal and other keepers for excessive chatter. What Murali issue ? Did you direct something about him at me. Must've missed it.

[CC1981]

Cannot remember ?

Indeed.

So you've read all my posts ? I'm impressed

no and that is not implied. I said i cannot remember - doesnt mean i've read all your posts.

Actually, the only player who's behaviour I can readily remember criticising, was Shane Watson. Wouldn't surprise me if I had also had a go at that long streak of misery from England, Steve Harmison. I have openly criticised McCullum, Gilchrist, Prior, Akmal and other keepers for excessive chatter.

Ie, tap on the wrist. Nuff said. why are you avoiding my invitation on debating Murali ? can you atleast say why that issue is something you are actively avoiding ?

[bharat297]

Cannot remember ? So you've read all my posts ? I'm impressed. :regular_smile: Actually, the only player who's behaviour I can readily remember criticising, was Shane Watson. Wouldn't surprise me if I had also had a go at that long streak of misery from England, Steve Harmison. I have openly criticised McCullum, Gilchrist, Prior, Akmal and other keepers for excessive chatter. What Murali issue ? Did you direct something about him at me. Must've missed it.

Just out of curiosity ... whats wrong with Harmisons behaviour? I mean his form has been up and down for the past 2 or 3 years and his attitude has been questioned but I cant recall anything bad about his on-field behaviour.

[CC1981]

What Murali issue ? Did you direct something about him at me. Must've missed it.

I responded to your defence of Gilly's comments on post # 4 in post #30

[King Tendulkar]

why are you avoiding my invitation on debating Murali ? can you atleast say why that issue is something you are actively avoiding ?

You will realise when he knows he will lose a debate he just avoids it. donny knows he will get battered by you in this debate hence will not engage!

[Donny]

I responded to your defence of Gilly's comments on post # 4 in post #30

Thanks, mate. Yes, didn't see it. I was commenting on Gilchrist's comments. Not on Murali.

[CC1981]

I was commenting on Gilchrist's comments.

LOL. Commenting ? For someone who likes to pick on semantics of the language, that is a rather evasive word. You wern't commenting - you were endorsing Gillchrist's comments. And i showed you how Gilly is absolutely incorrect and utterly clueless on this issue, along with your legions of scientifically challenged 'commentators, experts and players'. I repeat, it is irrelevant what Gilly or Warney or Bedi or a dozen other cricketing superstars think on Murali's action. Science has vindicated him and that stands taller than any legions of cricketing experts, who have no comprehension of the basic issue at hand.