Guest BossBhai Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
Guest BossBhai Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
Guest BossBhai Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
Chandan Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 Here you go Chandan ... # of Wkts taken before a batsman reaches 30 in away matches since 1995 (Sorted by the last column) [B]Team AwayTests Wkts(Runs<30) PerTest [/B] Australia 73 773 10.59 South Africa 74 673 9.09 India 72 619 8.60 Sri Lanka 60 515 8.58 England 77 660 8.57 Pakistan 63 523 8.30 New Zealand 59 468 7.93 West Indies 72 567 7.88 Zimbabwe 35 217 6.20 Bangladesh 30 106 3.53 Since 2003 Away : [B]Team AwayTests Wkts(Runs<30) PerTest [/B] Australia 31 323 10.42 India 33 315 9.55 Sri Lanka 26 236 9.08 England 34 301 8.85 South Africa 39 326 8.36 New Zealand 25 199 7.96 Pakistan 23 182 7.91 West Indies 29 189 6.52 Zimbabwe 8 36 4.50 Bangladesh 20 78 3.90 Hmm... Not bad!! But do the same thing exclusively for home series also in the same time frame, so that we can compare the difference in our own home and away performances as what happs to other countries when they play at home. Also it is interesting to note that India has played 33 test away since 2003 and only England is ahead of it. I'll like to settle Fontain's doubts that our bowlers can't do well at home pitches! Link to comment
Fontaine Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 Hmm... Not bad!! But do the same thing exclusively for home series also in the same time frame, so that we can compare the difference in our own home and away performances as what happs to other countries when they play at home. Also it is interesting to note that India has played 33 test away since 2003 and only England is ahead of it. I'll like to settle Fontain's doubts that our bowlers can't do well at home pitches! Dude why don't you relax, stop, and actually understand what I'm saying: Remarkeable how the stats present a different picture all together when you take the figures from 2003 onwards. And finally these stats are NOT weighted to consider flat decks you get in the subcontinent where the majority of the wickets are taken towards the end of the test when the pitches start crumbling/cracking. I never said that our bowlers can't do well at home pitches. And the stats pretty much bear that out. Since 2003 we're the 3rd best team overall in picking up wickets and that's considering the amount of turnover we've had in the pace bowling department. And finally, j/k about the Dude part! I know how much that annoys you! :winky: Link to comment
Guest BossBhai Posted January 29, 2009 Share Posted January 29, 2009 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
Fontaine Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 Since 2003 At home. [B]Team HomeTests Wkts(Runs<30) PerTest[/B] South Africa 31 360 11.61 Australia 39 446 11.44 Sri Lanka 27 307 11.37 England 42 424 10.10 New Zealand 22 203 9.23 Pakistan 21 179 8.52 India 29 245 8.45 West Indies 27 204 7.56 Zimbabwe 10 65 6.50 Bangladesh 22 127 5.77 Since 1995 at home [B]Team HomeTests Wkts(Runs<30) PerTest[/B] Australia 85 977 11.49 South Africa 76 834 10.97 Sri Lanka 62 670 10.81 New Zealand 58 555 9.57 India 61 570 9.34 Pakistan 49 455 9.29 England 91 844 9.27 West Indies 67 614 9.16 Zimbabwe 38 303 7.97 Bangladesh 29 158 5.45 Pretty much what I've been saying all along. At home since 2003 India are near the minnows in terms of bowling effectiveness yet in the same time period away, India have the 2nd best efficiency bowling when you include places like SA, Australia, England. Link to comment
Chandan Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Pretty much what I've been saying all along. At home since 2003 India are near the minnows in terms of bowling effectiveness yet in the same time period away' date=' India have the 2nd best efficiency bowling when you include places like SA, Australia, England.[/quote'] Oh really?? So now you find this stat quite meaningful, don't you? And a minnow team doesn't lose just one test series in a decade. Do you know that in this millenium India has been defeated at home just once? Yet, you can count our series failures away from home and you'll find that we've won just three test series away from home in last 9 years, except in Zim and Bangladesh. Now will you give the reasons for those defeats? Link to comment
Fontaine Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Oh really?? So now you find this stat quite meaningful, don't you? And a minnow team doesn't lose just one test series in a decade. Do you know that in this millenium India has been defeated at home just once? Yet, you can count our series failures away from home and you'll find that we've won just three test series away from home in last 9 years, except in Zim and Bangladesh. Now will you give the reasons for those defeats? I think you need to go back and read what I actually said. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now