kabira Posted March 23, 2007 Posted March 23, 2007 as Bangla and Ireland will be whipping boys for other teams in Super 8... SL has to play Aus, WI, SF, NZL, IRL, ENG? WI has to play Aus, SL, SF, NZL, ENG, BAN whereas other 4 teams have 2 easy games in BAN and IRL..so 4 easy points... NZL have huge advantage, Semifinal guaranteed, Same with either of Aus or SA whoever wins the game tomorrow.
yoda Posted March 23, 2007 Posted March 23, 2007 Re: Srilanka and WI have disadvantages No diff. They all have to play each other. If any Ireland and Bang have it tough cause they can't play against themselves.
Predator_05 Posted March 23, 2007 Posted March 23, 2007 Re: Srilanka and WI have disadvantages ENG have an excellent chance of making the semifinals now, as do NZ. They will get two free wins over Ireland and Banglastan and are more than capable of upsetting one top seed or the other.
apocalypse Posted March 23, 2007 Posted March 23, 2007 Re: Srilanka and WI have disadvantages WI, Bangladesh, Ireland and England will be out in super 8
yoda Posted March 23, 2007 Posted March 23, 2007 Re: Srilanka and WI have disadvantages i donno what free wins you guys are talking about. if eng has a free win against bang, SL has already gotten that free win.
shailesh Posted March 23, 2007 Posted March 23, 2007 Re: Srilanka and WI have disadvantages who gives a you know what :shrug:
kabira Posted March 23, 2007 Author Posted March 23, 2007 Re: Srilanka and WI have disadvantages >No diff. They all have to play each other. If any Ireland and Bang have it tough cause they can't play against themselves. What? They already have 2 points from there.... whereas consider Newzealand...2 points already + two easy games = semifinal guarantted.. same for either Aus or SF.
apocalypse Posted March 23, 2007 Posted March 23, 2007 Re: Srilanka and WI have disadvantages yeah semifinal NZ vs Aus/SA SL vs Aus/SA
yoda Posted March 23, 2007 Posted March 23, 2007 Re: Srilanka and WI have disadvantages >No diff. They all have to play each other. If any Ireland and Bang have it tough cause they can't play against themselves. What? They already have 2 points from there.... whereas consider Newzealand...2 points already + two easy games = semifinal guarantted.. same for either Aus or SF. NZ beat ENG and got 2 points from that. SL beats ENG, they will also get those 2 points. Only thing is SL beat IND as well and are getting nothing in return. They only carry 2 points for an easy victory over BANG.
kabira Posted March 23, 2007 Author Posted March 23, 2007 Re: Srilanka and WI have disadvantages >Only thing is SL beat IND as well and are getting nothing in return. They only carry 2 points for an easy victory over BANG. so they have disadvantage right? Because Bangla will not beat anyone...whereas India would have atleast won against one team.. Westindieas beat Ireland...and they know Ireland cannot beat any other team..so its disadvantage.. whereas consider England, they can beat big boys...
Bumper Posted March 23, 2007 Posted March 23, 2007 Re: Srilanka and WI have disadvantages What disadvantage. The alternatives to BD & Ireland were - Ind & Pak :hic:
yoda Posted March 23, 2007 Posted March 23, 2007 Re: Srilanka and WI have disadvantages >Only thing is SL beat IND as well and are getting nothing in return. They only carry 2 points for an easy victory over BANG. so they have disadvantage right? Because Bangla will not beat anyone...whereas India would have atleast won against one team.. Westindieas beat Ireland...and they know Ireland cannot beat any other team..so its disadvantage.. whereas consider England, they can beat big boys... Think of it as a super 8 with no carry over points and all teams playing the other 7, SL played BANG first and WI played IRL first, NZ played ENG first and SAF played AUS first. What's the difference?
kabira Posted March 23, 2007 Author Posted March 23, 2007 Re: Srilanka and WI have disadvantages >Think of it as a super 8 with no carry over points and all teams playing the other 7, SL played BANG first and WI played IRL first, NZ played ENG first and SAF played AUS first. there is SAF and Australia will def. beat Bang and IRL.... So did SL.... so far same.. But now SL cant expect Bangla to win any of their other game..instead if there was India, they would have atleast win one game...
yoda Posted March 23, 2007 Posted March 23, 2007 Re: Srilanka and WI have disadvantages >Think of it as a super 8 with no carry over points and all teams playing the other 7, SL played BANG first and WI played IRL first, NZ played ENG first and SAF played AUS first. there is SAF and Australia will def. beat Bang and IRL.... So did SL.... so far same.. But now SL cant expect Bangla to win any of their other game..instead if there was India, they would have atleast win one game... forget about india. assume we don't count. all i am saying is consider the first round as the 1st set of matches of the super 8. that's all.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now