Spider Posted July 22, 2010 Posted July 22, 2010 So we have Murali in the SL corner amd Tendy in the Ind corner, who has been the best cricketer in their careers.
21cent Posted July 22, 2010 Posted July 22, 2010 Hard to compare a batsman and a bowler. But a quick search on statsguru says from 1989 to 2010 each wicket that has been taken cost 33.32 runs each. So if we multiply this by the number of wickets Murali has taken by this average, it comes out to be 26656 runs. Sachin has 13539 runs. If we divide Sachins runs by 33.32 , Sachin has 402 wickets. This doesn't make a whole lot of sense, but then i see no other way to compare these two.
Jersey #10 Posted July 22, 2010 Posted July 22, 2010 ^ That's the most bull **** method of comparison I have ever seen.
21cent Posted July 22, 2010 Posted July 22, 2010 ^^ I said it myself it doesn't make a whole lot of sense. if this is BS, why dont you try to make a comparison that can be better?
yoda Posted July 23, 2010 Posted July 23, 2010 Hard to compare a batsman and a bowler. But a quick search on statsguru says from 1989 to 2010 each wicket that has been taken cost 33.32 runs each. So if we multiply this by the number of wickets Murali has taken by this average, it comes out to be 26656 runs. Sachin has 13539 runs. If we divide Sachins runs by 33.32 , Sachin has 402 wickets. This doesn't make a whole lot of sense, but then i see no other way to compare these two. I would say 25 points per wicket as a 4 wicket haul is pretty close to scoring a century. Still would end up being bogus when we compare.
Spider Posted July 23, 2010 Author Posted July 23, 2010 Hard to compare a batsman and a bowler. But a quick search on statsguru says from 1989 to 2010 each wicket that has been taken cost 33.32 runs each. So if we multiply this by the number of wickets Murali has taken by this average, it comes out to be 26656 runs. Sachin has 13539 runs. If we divide Sachins runs by 33.32 , Sachin has 402 wickets. This doesn't make a whole lot of sense, but then i see no other way to compare these two. Interesting comparision and certainly not BS. I know you cant compare a bowler with a batsman but Murali is in a group of very limited bowlers whereas Tendulkar is in a large group of batsmen. Murali in my books probably has the better career.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now