Jump to content

Sreesanth likely to replace Nehra in final

jpkonline

By jpkonline
in Cricket Talk

Recommended Posts

Ranjha Newbie

Ranjha

Posted
Posted
Hey look guys, that makes it ok..52 runs in 8 overs when others have given 87 in 23 overs.. Mr. "I know my sport" kindly go shove it in your ass
:hysterical::hysterical:
Midfielder Newbie

Midfielder

Posted
Posted
Hey look guys, that makes it ok..52 runs in 8 overs when others have given 87 in 23 overs.. Mr. "I know my sport" kindly go shove it in your ass
In the end when India wins you can do the honors.
Zap_Brannigan Newbie

Zap_Brannigan

Posted
Posted

If India wins, it has nothing to do with Sresanths inclusion..how dumb can you get, without his spell and Sachins to covers his 2 overs, we would be 130 for 5 in 30 something overs.If you add Ashwins average bowling, we would be 180/7. On the other hand if India loses, it has everything to do with Sreesanths inclusion.

Midfielder Newbie

Midfielder

Posted
Posted
If India wins, it has nothing to do with Sresanths inclusion..how dumb can you get, without his spell and Sachins to covers his 2 overs, we would be 130 for 5 in 30 something overs.If you add Ashwins average bowling, we would be 180/7. On the other hand if India loses, it has everything to do with Sreesanths inclusion.
You are so good at straight line interpolation that without taking anything else in account you want to plug Ashwin's average. Are you up for the Field's award this year? If India loses it has everything to do with India batting.
Zap_Brannigan Newbie

Zap_Brannigan

Posted
Posted
You are so good at straight line interpolation that without taking anything else in account you want to plug Ashwin's average. Are you up for the Field's award this year? If India loses it has everything to do with India batting.
No, but that is all we can do here. Sreesanth bowled worse than he usually does. Ashwin has bowled better than usual in WC. Like i said earlier, Ashwin had a much higher probabilty of bowling better and looking at Sreeaanth bowling today, he probably would have done much much better.
Midfielder Newbie

Midfielder

Posted
Posted
No' date=' but that is all we can do here. Sreesanth bowled worse than he usually does. Ashwin has bowled better than usual in WC. Like i said earlier, Ashwin had a much higher probabilty of bowling better and looking at Sreeaanth bowling today, he probably would have done much much better.[/quote'] Bottom line is it was the right call to include Santh. In retrospect it did not pan out but still the correct call. If he was included against NZ or AUS I would say Ashwin is better. In this case it was the correct call and I would also make it everytime against this opposition.
Zap_Brannigan Newbie

Zap_Brannigan

Posted
Posted
Bottom line is it was the right call to include Santh. In retrospect it did not pan out but still the correct call. If he was included against NZ or AUS I would say Ashwin is better. In this case it was the correct call and I would also make it everytime against this opposition.
How can you say that with a straight face. It was a horrible call.
Midfielder Newbie

Midfielder

Posted
Posted
How can you say that with a straight face. It was a horrible call.
SL has always folded to pace bowlers and they do great against spinners. Hence correct call. Once again the game will be won/lost by batting not these guys.
Midfielder Newbie

Midfielder

Posted
Posted
I understand sports. Unlike some of you if you read my posts I was the first one asking for 3 pacers . Guess whtat the results were. Think before you comment on sports.
+1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...