Jump to content

Tharanga suspended for three months


Recommended Posts

Posted
You seriously have reading disabilities. It clearly says when "administered systematically". DO you know what that means? There is absolutely no current evidence that Tharanga systematically took that drug for performance enhancement. Yet you go running around screaming like a mad man that his record should be expunged etc. Are you insane?
I do have reading disability when it comes to your posts. I would still not have pulled the crap Tharanga did. All athletes who cheat have the most stupid of excuses. He tested positive. What is that you dont understand Stephen Hawking?
Guest Gunner
Posted
I do have reading disability when it comes to your posts. I would still not have pulled the crap Tharanga did. All athletes who cheat have the most stupid of excuses. He tested positive. What is that you dont understand Stephen Hawking?
You are a nutcase, I am done. Presumption of innocence until proven guilty seems to be unknown to you, so I don't have anymore time to waste on you Stephen Hawking.
Guest Gunner
Posted
No he is guilty. The drug was in his system so quit apologising for him
:hysterical::hysterical: Ok. :cantstop::cantstop:
Posted
WhichI agree is probably where Tharanga went wrong. Either he was unaware or just plain stupid but until there is evidence that he did it on putpose he should be presumed to be innocent.
No Rules are pretty clear, even if he did not do it purposely, he should know what he is taking. Does not matter if took it purposely or not.
Guest Gunner
Posted
No Rules are pretty clear' date=' even if he did not do it purposely, he should know what he is taking. Does not matter if took it purposely or not.[/quote'] That is not what I am saying. It is possible that he was unaware of the nature of the substance he was taking or was simply unclear about the rules. Why can't we wait to condemn him? It is silly to just assume he is absolutely guilty without knowing what are the full facts.
Posted
That is not what I am saying. It is possible that he was unaware of the nature of the substance he was taking or was simply unclear about the rules. Why can't we wait to condemn him? It is silly to just assume he is absolutely guilty without knowing what are the full facts.
My dog ate my home work.So far I have been civil to you. You have crossed the limit multiple times. Go duck off you $%^.
Posted
No Rules are pretty clear' date=' even if he did not do it purposely, he should know what he is taking. Does not matter if took it purposely or not.[/quote'] That is exactly what the rule is. If you are unaware of the rule that is not a defnse in any court of law.
Guest Gunner
Posted
My dog ate my home work.So far I have been civil to you. You have crossed the limit multiple times. Go duck off you $%^.
Run out of arguments so resort to personal attacks? Dude you have mental issues.
Guest Gunner
Posted
:popcorn: I never knew that Tharanga could evoke such passionate responses from both sides. :cantstop:
:cantstop::cantstop: I am only taking objection to the Lord ******* midfielder playing judge here.
Posted
:popcorn: I never knew that Tharanga could evoke such passionate responses from both sides. :cantstop:
This is the first time Padosis have been given a chance to mock others lol.They don't want to miss it:cantstop:
Posted
This is the first time Padosis have been given a chance to mock others lol.They don't want to miss it:cantstop:
They were the ones who started the rumour about Dilshan during the WC. :hysterical:
Posted
They were the ones who started the rumour about Dilshan during the WC. :hysterical:
oh yeah that time missile went to hit the wrong player ,otherwise padosis would have said that rumor wasn't a rumor .:hysterical::hysterical:
Posted
You are a nutcase, I am done. Presumption of innocence until proven guilty seems to be unknown to you, so I don't have anymore time to waste on you Stephen Hawking.
I think you're the laughing stock in this thread. It doesn't matter if the drugs were ingested deliberately or not. If they are in his system then he is guilty. Intent does not matter.
Posted
I think you're the laughing stock in this thread. It doesn't matter if the drugs were ingested deliberately or not. If they are in his system then he is guilty. Intent does not matter.
So true. There are multiple steroids he could have taken but why the banned one. If this is my career I would be aware of this rule. Except for Baseball no other sport allows the use of this drug. Gunner has lost it trying to defend this drug cheat and accusing Gambhir without any proof. This character needs to know Indian players like Gambhir are professional enough to know not to do it.
Posted

Ponka demands that this thread to be locked until proofs are shared by the ICC to the SLC board. Until then it should be considered as Masala News.

Posted

I agree that the punishment would have to be meted out regardless of his intention for taking the substance. a suspension would be in order if the B-sample is tested positive. But making allegations of cheating, without having proof that it is a performance enhancing steroid and asking for records to be expunged is too extreme.

Posted
I agree that the punishment would have to be meted out regardless of his intention for taking the substance. a suspension would be in order if the B-sample is tested positive. But making allegations of cheating, without having proof that it is a performance enhancing steroid and asking for records to be expunged is too extreme.
The only problem I have with him is if his inning had a positive effect for SL. If confirmed 100% (which I think it would be) then as a minimum he should be suspended as Football does to their players.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...