Umpires ask ICC to look in to Hughes' dismissal

[CG]

They aren't using the proper system as the Aussie board would use' date=' its a cheap knockoff hawk eye.[/quote'] No its the same.hawkeye just predicts a straight line path from point of impact of pitch to batsman .it cannot show spin or seam.

[mrinalmech]

They aren't using the proper system as the Aussie board would use' date=' its a cheap knockoff hawk eye.[/quote'] You're the same Robelinda on youtube with those anti Sachin vids?

[Robelinda]

No they are using a different hawk eye, during the Ashes ( where there was perfect hawk eye use) they were using un updated one called Visual Eye, which was deemed much better than Hawk Eye by Cricket Australia, and we had no issues. The normal one they are using in SL was shown to be less than great, hence we don't use it in Australia, but we can't do much about what other host countries choose.

[achilles]

You should join the green ghetto as a writer.

You fail to detect sarcasm, Clarke?

[CG]

No they are using a different hawk eye' date=' during the Ashes ( where there was perfect hawk eye use) they were using un updated one called Visual Eye, which was deemed much better than Hawk Eye by Cricket Australia, and we had no issues. The normal one they are using in SL was shown to be less than great, hence we don't use it in Australia, but we can't do much about what other host countries choose.[/quote'] Hawkeye or visual eye there priciples are same they predict a straight line path from where the ball hits the batsman .