Jump to content

Cricket Australia to revert to experts deciding man of the match


SachDan

Recommended Posts

Posted

Cricket Australia will return to the voting of an expert to decide the man-of-the-match award following the controversy over Monday's Hobart Test. Mobile phone and tablet app-users shunned New Zealand quick Doug Bracewell's match figures of 9-60 and voted Australia's David Warner as best player for his unbeaten 123 in the losing side's second innings. Bracewell polled just 27 per cent of the vote to Warner's 58 in the Vodafone-sponsored arrangement. "We were always running a bit of a trial for these two Tests with those man-of-the-match awards," Cricket Australia chief James Sutherland told Radio 3AW on Wednesday. "But we will definitely revert to an expert's choice for that decision about man of the match. "We will still run what the fans think. It has worked really well with the (viewers' choice) application and the television. "It's something really ahead of its time and I'm sure we'll see it in other sports as well in the future." A sheepish Warner said in his acceptance speech that Bracewell's bowling had been fantastic. New Zealand assistant coach Trent Woodhill described the decision to give the award to Warner as embarrassing. "David Warner had a fantastic innings," Woodhill told ESPNCricinfo. "Doug Bracewell was the player of that match. He took nine wickets for 60. "If it wasn't for him, we wouldn't have won the match. To me, that's who the player of the match should be." Australia host India for a four-Test series starting on Boxing Day at the MCG. http://www.foxsports.com.au/cricket/australia/cricket-australia-backdown-revert-away-from-audience-voting-for-man-of-the-match-award-for-india-test-series/story-fn2mcu3x-1226222057015

Posted
The reason is that the poll opened when Warner had them very close to victory. Even I voted for Warner as I thought he was playing a match winning innings
Exactly, it was really dependent on who won the match. I'm sure if they opened the poll after the game most people would of voted Bracewell, the problem is most Aussies would of turned the telly off by then! It's always best to have the experts decide it, when you get the public there is always going to be bias.
Posted

It doesn't matter to the Indians even if they continue with fans voting for the MOM awards. Coz Indians are going to out number Australians here as well :cantstop:. In fact, if they continue with this experiment, it'd better for Indians coz then even in every match that India loses, we will make sure that atleast MOM award goes to an Indian :hysterical:. I think they should try this experiment on man-of-the-series award as well :winky:

Posted
It doesn't matter to the Indians even if they continue with fans voting for the MOM awards. Coz Indians are going to out number Australians here as well :cantstop:. In fact, if they continue with this experiment, it'd better for Indians coz then even in every match that India loses, we will make sure that atleast MOM award goes to an Indian :hysterical:. I think they should try this experiment on man-of-the-series award as well :winky:
You can always trust Indians to make a mockery of Polls. :isalute:
Posted
You can always trust Indians to make a mockery of Polls. :isalute:
Same goes with Australians too who chose Warner ahead of Bracewell. Common people always backs their heroes whether or not it is right or wrong
Posted

Daar gaye Australia wale ,but on serious note its good to see that experts will choose the MOM instead of public, who tends to be biased towards their players .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...