Viki_J Posted December 22, 2011 Posted December 22, 2011 Melbourne: Dec 22, 2011 : According to the study done by Dr. Nicolas Rohde from the Griffith University, who used economic theory to compare Sachin Tendulkar and Sir Don Bradman. India's batting star Sachin Tendulkar has emerged as the greatest Test batsman to have played the game, usurping Sir Donald Bradman. Click here to read more on New study of Dr.Nicolas Rohde!
Raghav_12 Posted December 22, 2011 Posted December 22, 2011 If this thread doesn't get merged with other ones, then would have some 500+ posts :--D.
Viki_J Posted December 22, 2011 Author Posted December 22, 2011 If this thread doesn't get merged with other ones' date=' then would have some 500+ posts :--D.[/quote'] hahaha...dude..Sachin is god of cricket...!!
Viki_J Posted December 22, 2011 Author Posted December 22, 2011 :WTF: LOLworthy "study" why lol worthy ?? :hitler: what is wrong wid u...r u with Sachin or Bradman ? Sachin has made his debut in 1989, has amassed a world-record 15,183 runs from 184 Test matches at an average of 56.02 isnt this remarkable?
ganeshran Posted December 22, 2011 Posted December 22, 2011 Now Bradman fanatics will have to come up with arguments to discredit the study.
Viki_J Posted December 22, 2011 Author Posted December 22, 2011 Now Bradman fanatics will have to come up with arguments to discredit the study. yup..its gonnaa be even worse for Bradman :hysterical:
yoda Posted December 22, 2011 Posted December 22, 2011 "Essentially each player is scored according to their career aggregate runs, minus the total number of runs that an average player of that era would accrue over the same number of innings,” he added. Wow, what a study! :hahaha:
Viki_J Posted December 22, 2011 Author Posted December 22, 2011 Wow' date=' what a study! :hahaha:[/quote'] :whack: yaaaaaa..
Viki_J Posted December 22, 2011 Author Posted December 22, 2011 not another thread on the same topic The topic is so so Happening bhai!! all are welcome :hatsoff:
surajmal Posted December 22, 2011 Posted December 22, 2011 Now Bradman fanatics will have to come up with arguments to discredit the study. RPT pwns all. Yeh Nicolas Rohde (rhymes with lorday) kis khet ki mooli hai. :finger::cantstop:
zep1706 Posted December 22, 2011 Posted December 22, 2011 I think there is some merit in the study. People generally put forward the argument of Bradman being way ahead of his contemporaries, which is still true, but this study proves that the average of an average player in the Bradman era was way higher than that in the Tendulkar era.
SachDan Posted December 22, 2011 Posted December 22, 2011 The way yoda makes his entry to every thread related to Bradman gives one the impression that he has watched Bradman bat all his life..obsession is simply unbelievable!
8ankitj Posted December 22, 2011 Posted December 22, 2011 why lol worthy ?? :hitler: what is wrong wid u...r u with Sachin or Bradman ? Sachin has made his debut in 1989, has amassed a world-record 15,183 runs from 184 Test matches at an average of 56.02 isnt this remarkable? With Sachin or Bradman? I am with neither, I am with Dhoni :winky: What's right with this study? "Essentially each player is scored according to their career aggregate runs, minus the total number of runs that an average player of that era would accrue over the same number of innings,” he added. They have simply added up the runs less what an average player would score. They have ignored the fact that Tendulkar has played more than thrice the number of matches that Bradman did. On a per match basis, Bradman's score will be more than three times Tendulkar's. If Bradman played the same number of matches his score will be ~13000 on this rating compared to Tendulkar's 4000. If any thing it only puts in perspective how much better Bradman was compared to Tendulkar.
8ankitj Posted December 22, 2011 Posted December 22, 2011 The way yoda makes his entry to every thread related to Bradman gives one the impression that he has watched Bradman bat all his life..obsession is simply unbelievable! Irony barometer just blew away.
surajmal Posted December 22, 2011 Posted December 22, 2011 With Sachin or Bradman? I am with neither, I am with Dhoni :winky: What's right with this study? They have simply added up the runs less what an average player would score. They have ignored the fact that Tendulkar has played more than thrice the number of matches that Bradman did. On a per match basis, Bradman's score will be more than three times Tendulkar's. If Bradman played the same number of matches his score will be ~13000 on this rating compared to Tendulkar's 4000. If any thing it only puts in perspective how much better Bradman was compared to Tendulkar. the fact that you deduce that shows how little you know about statistics.
8ankitj Posted December 22, 2011 Posted December 22, 2011 the fact that you deduce that shows how little you know about statistics. Let me break it to you, I do statistics and data analysis for a living.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now