Karan114 Posted June 2, 2012 Posted June 2, 2012 Australian Cricketers Association says players are preparing to strike as contract negotiations drag on By Peter Lalor The Australian June 02, 2012 Australian cricket is on the verge of an ugly industrial dispute, with the players preparing for strike action if a contract is not struck by the end of the month. Australian Cricketers Association head Paul Marsh confirmed last night there were contingency plans should the two sides fail to agree before July 1. The players are said to have examined a boycott of next month's one-day tour of England or the Twenty20 world championships. State players will also be locked out if the deadline is not met. Relationships between players and management are heated and threatening to become as ugly as the stand-off surrounding the first player contract negotiations during Mark Taylor's captaincy. Cricket Australia is playing hardball in negotiations and has frozen all state and Big Bash contract talks under the threat of a $50,000 fine until the new agreement is in place. Players and state administrators have both raised the possibility of a tour boycott, as frustrations rise over a situation in which players are unsure which state they will be training with in four weeks time and how much they will be paid. Western Australia's training begins on Tuesday, but the state association is barred from deciding who will play for it this summer. Usman Khawaja and Nathan Hauritz - who have both been linked with moves to Queensland -- have been training in NSW this week as they remain in limbo because of the Cricket Australia contract freeze. One player described the state contract ban as a "divide and conquer" tactic and Cricket Australia general manager Pat Howard, who has been leading the negotiations, has been talking to players and managers, adding to ill feeling. Marsh said the players were preparing for the possibility of an industrial stand-off if there was no contract in place before the current one ends. "There's only 29 days of negotiations left to run, so of course we are preparing for the eventuality of not having a deal in place before the end of July," he said. "We are looking at all of our different options." The players and Cricket Australia were progressing towards an agreement on a controversial shift to performance-based pay when CA tabled a demand to change the definition of cricket revenue. The association considers that a $30 million cash grab and there is frustration that the bid was tabled late in negotiations. The players argue they are not asking for more money, but want to ensure they do not receive less at a time when the game is in reasonable financial health. Before the redefinition of revenue, the main sticking point in the negotiations was a move to adjust the players' revenue share according to performance. At the moment the players receive 26 per cent of all cricket income but that would move to a sliding scale under a new deal. The pot from which the percentage is taken would shrink under the proposals to remove contra deals and new digital media. A stand-off last year led to the previous deal being rolled over for 12 months, but there are hopes the new one will be a five-year deal. There is no mechanism for contracts to roll over if a settlement is not reached by the end of the month. Sydney Sixers chief executive Stuart Clark said the impasse was making it impossible for franchises to win sponsors. "The first question sponsors ask you is who are your players and when you can't give a straight answer to that question, then it makes things very difficult," he said. "Sponsorship is hard in the current economic environment. Nobody is saying it's easy, and we need everything in our favour to sign a sponsor. Not having that, it is even more difficult." Cricket NSW chief executive David Gilbert has expressed frustration with the ban on negotiations as nobody is sure who will play where this summer. The threat of a $50,000 fine will not, however, stop Big Bash franchises looking to swoop on Kevin Pietersen, who stood down from one-day and T20 internationals on Friday and is on the market. http://www.foxsports.com.au/cricket/australia/australian-cricketers-association-says-players-are-preparing-to-strike-as-contract-negotiations-drag-on/story-fn2mcu3x-1226381170284
Ultimate_Game Posted June 2, 2012 Posted June 2, 2012 Quick! Let's tour Aus when the top players are on strike :haha:
Cricket Tragic Posted June 2, 2012 Posted June 2, 2012 Bull **** news. Them Aussies wonly play for pride of the state/country and not for money. In fact, I'm surprised to learn that Aussie players earn money from cricket. I thought they played for free.
Needforspeed Posted June 2, 2012 Posted June 2, 2012 I am sure the IPL is to blame for this strike too. Therefore like 'IPL parties' or 'IPL molestation', this must be an 'IPL strike':hysterical:
jairamesh Posted June 2, 2012 Posted June 2, 2012 money money money :hitler: don't worry...if you don't havvvve any monnneeee, yeah right :finger:
Crookbond Posted June 4, 2012 Posted June 4, 2012 Player strike 'a last resort' - Paul Marsh "That sort of stuff [a strike] is always an absolute last resort," Marsh said on ABC Radio on Monday. "I think our preferred method here, and I don't know what Cricket Australia's position is, but our preferred strategy would be to keep rolling the current deal until we can reach an agreement. Nobody wants a situation where the players aren't playing. But I guess it takes two to tango. "Where the story has come from over the weekend, the question was put to us are you preparing for a boycott or strike action… we're preparing for everything. We're not going to get to the 30th of June and say we haven't got a deal, what do we do now? Our job is to make sure when that time comes, hopefully we have got a deal, that's our absolute priority, but if we haven't then we've got to be able to talk different options. Obviously we'll take those options back to the collective player group and we'll make a decision from there." http://www.espncricinfo.com/australia/content/current/story/567190.html
ganeshran Posted June 4, 2012 Posted June 4, 2012 Bull **** news. Them Aussies wonly play for pride of the state/country and not for money. In fact' date=' I'm surprised to learn that Aussie players earn money from cricket. I thought they played for free.[/quote'] :cantstop:
Sidhoni Posted June 4, 2012 Posted June 4, 2012 Bull **** news. Them Aussies wonly play for pride of the state/country and not for money. In fact' date=' I'm surprised to learn that Aussie players earn money from cricket. I thought they played for free.[/quote'] :cantstop:
Needforspeed Posted June 4, 2012 Posted June 4, 2012 Bull **** news. Them Aussies wonly play for pride of the state/country and not for money. In fact' date=' I'm surprised to learn that Aussie players earn money from cricket. I thought they played for free.[/quote'] Nah ! Only the Inglanders play for love of queen and country. Not for such evil things like money. :cantstop:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now