Guest dada_rocks Posted August 21, 2007 Posted August 21, 2007 http://www.ibnlive.com/videos/47160/tirupati-gets-special-religious-zone-status.html So what do u guys feel aboout it......
Lurker Posted August 21, 2007 Posted August 21, 2007 I hate it. Everyone should be allowed to go everywhere in India.
Guest dada_rocks Posted August 21, 2007 Posted August 21, 2007 ham sahmat hain isse wo mandir mein na jane dena tak to thik hai.. logic ye ki ab jab aap kisis chij ki izzat hi nahin karte hain fir wahan kyun jayenge aap.. par ye radius wala system kuchh samajh mein nahin aaya.. waise this rule is off-shoot of barring proselytizers in around 20 temple town where every street has temple........
yoda Posted August 21, 2007 Posted August 21, 2007 I hate it. Everyone should be allowed to go everywhere in India. it is a private property owned by TTD.
Lurker Posted August 21, 2007 Posted August 21, 2007 ^^ And why does it have to be 110 km? Yeh jyaada ho gaya kya bhai? I mean 110 km mein to Gaya se Patna pahoonch jaayega aadmi. And what about someone who wants to go to Tirupathy only for the laddoos? Woh to rah gaya phir aise hi/..
Lurker Posted August 21, 2007 Posted August 21, 2007 it is a private property owned by TTD. I know what you are saying, but how can Gods be private property? Even for trusts?? Isnt that like a religious prostitution Yoda? xx
yoda Posted August 21, 2007 Posted August 21, 2007 I know what you are saying, but how can Gods be private property? Even for trusts?? Isnt that like a religious prostitution Yoda? xx Not gods, temples. It is more like religious protection, especially from aholes who want hindus to convert right at one of the holiest and most visited places. I say arrest those bastards and put them in prison.
Guest dada_rocks Posted August 21, 2007 Posted August 21, 2007 I didn't know it was private property ye secular govt kaise chhor rakha hai isko private hand mein.. most of the money-making hindu temples are in govt control it has to be an aberrtion.. if it's private property fir koi gal nahin unki marzi jo karen..
Guest dada_rocks Posted August 21, 2007 Posted August 21, 2007 ^^ And why does it have to be 110 km? Yeh jyaada ho gaya kya bhai? I mean 110 km mein to Gaya se Patna pahoonch jaayega aadmi. And what about someone who wants to go to Tirupathy only for the laddoos? Woh to rah gaya phir aise hi/.. Actually wahan be kafi sare temples hain .. 110 km covers them all.....
Lurker Posted August 21, 2007 Posted August 21, 2007 Not gods' date=' temples. It is more like religious protection, especially from aholes who want hindus to convert right at one of the holiest and most visited places. I say arrest those bastards and put them in prison.[/quote'] I am surprised to know that. Somehow did not know it was a trust. Maybe another reason to visit now.
Lurker Posted August 21, 2007 Posted August 21, 2007 how will they know if a person is hindu or not ? Everyone's gotta carry ID cards now ? They'll guess by looking at the name ? Or go back to partition-style identification ? Or will they take a test on mantras ? What if it's a person from abroad who's technically a hindu ('coz his parents were hindus) wants to go ? So if this person considers himself an atheist he's not allowed ? Sounds like a clique to me.. I thought were were inclusivists and not exclusivists.. :hysterical::hysterical: Time to bump up my thread, "Always wear clean underwear to Doctors"...
varun Posted August 21, 2007 Posted August 21, 2007 koi nahi lurker.. i deleted my post :P I was under the impression it's for all ppl wanting to visit, though I'm guessing it's against missionaries ?
Guest dada_rocks Posted August 21, 2007 Posted August 21, 2007 Not gods' date=' temples. It is more like religious protection, especially from aholes who want hindus to convert right at one of the holiest and most visited places. I say arrest those bastards and put them in prison.[/quote'] I agree Islamists/christians have no rights to complain.. we have allowed them in holiest place of hinduism Varanasi where they have their mosque dwarfing the most holy temple vishwanath temple in the same campus purportedly on the ruins of another shiv temple....whereas they have no go zone of vatican and makkah medina... han secular hindus can debate complain but given it's private property am not sure what rights we have to judge them.. we decide who enters our property, and even put boards like "trespasers will be prosecuted " so why can't they decide who gets to enter their private property
Guest dada_rocks Posted August 21, 2007 Posted August 21, 2007 btw good thign ti has come under congress watch otherwise psec media wud have never stopped talking about it
yoda Posted August 21, 2007 Posted August 21, 2007 spot on ... But welcome to the "Bhagwa Club" :yay: You are now a Hindutva looney :eyedance:
Gaurav Posted August 21, 2007 Posted August 21, 2007 I don't know about the actual distance but it's good to keep faith harvesters away from the actual holy sites.
gator Posted August 22, 2007 Posted August 22, 2007 I hate it. Everyone should be allowed to go everywhere in India. it is a nice ideology, lurks.... but thts not how it works practically.... the CM of andhra was a christian and his winning election shows the secularity of the nation and broad-mindedness of people.... but at the same time, he has been promoting a lot of christian conversions and stuff.... i have a friend who is from hyderabad and will have to give him weightage cos he does see the difference... it will peeve many people including urs truly to see conversions and solicitations happen near the largest and most visited hindu temple in the world...
CC1981 Posted August 22, 2007 Posted August 22, 2007 Okay, only thing i find wrong with this law is that some priest got beat up for praying in his own home coz it was inside this 'radius'. I think that is simply taking it too far. Sure, i understand that Tirumala is a holy site of hinduism and while debate about Dharma is to be welcomed, blatant propaganda from the Abrahamic cults definitely do not fit in the picture. However, I do think that if some padre or muslim who lives/visits tirumala deciedes to pray to their God in private, that should, by no means, be disallowed.
Guest dada_rocks Posted August 22, 2007 Posted August 22, 2007 that's not law, that's hooligansim .. law prohibits u from preaching not practicing
gator Posted August 22, 2007 Posted August 22, 2007 Okay, only thing i find wrong with this law is that some priest got beat up for praying in his own home coz it was inside this 'radius'. I think that is simply taking it too far. Sure, i understand that Tirumala is a holy site of hinduism and while debate about Dharma is to be welcomed, blatant propaganda from the Abrahamic cults definitely do not fit in the picture. However, I do think that if some padre or muslim who lives/visits tirumala deciedes to pray to their God in private, that should, by no means, be disallowed. i dont think, it is disallowed.... only preaching is banned..... and i fully support it....
Recommended Posts