Parth Posted August 30, 2007 Author Share Posted August 30, 2007 I'm just saying, someone who has played International cricket for nearley 2 decades and broken so many records, and still he gets out when his country needs him most, why doesn't he just retire. Look at Lara, there was a battle between these two about who was th best batsmen in the World and sensibley Lara retires, why the need for Tendulkar to carry on. Link to comment
Guest BossBhai Posted August 30, 2007 Share Posted August 30, 2007 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
Anakin Posted August 30, 2007 Share Posted August 30, 2007 I'm not talking about captaincy' date=' i'm talking about Tendulkar, and it is true that he cannot win a game with his batting.[/quote'] Beta, in about 40 years time you'll reach the age which will be still less than MoMs achieved by SRT in ODIs. Link to comment
Guest BossBhai Posted August 30, 2007 Share Posted August 30, 2007 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
King Posted August 30, 2007 Share Posted August 30, 2007 Parth makes no sense whatsoever. He's trashing Tendulkar for scoring over 50 runs today :confused_smile: Link to comment
Aditi Posted August 31, 2007 Share Posted August 31, 2007 :rose::rose::rose::rose::rose::rose::rose::rose::rose::rose::rose::rose::rose::rose::rose: he's just a kid, yaaron! Link to comment
Chaos Posted August 31, 2007 Share Posted August 31, 2007 I'm just saying, someone who has played International cricket for nearley 2 decades and broken so many records, and still he gets out when his country needs him most, why doesn't he just retire. Look at Lara, there was a battle between these two about who was th best batsmen in the World and sensibley Lara retires, why the need for Tendulkar to carry on. arrey dumbo, lara retired at almost 38, where as tendu is ONLY 34, only 20 more years than. Here since you are only 14, let me do the math for you : Parth, P = 14 Sachin, S = 34 Formula : S - P = 34 - 14 = 20 years older than you. Lara = 38 Sachin = 34 38 - 34 = 4 years difference. Now did u get it? :cantstop: Link to comment
Holysmoke Posted August 31, 2007 Share Posted August 31, 2007 so what if he is a kid, my 9 year old nephew would know that if it wasnt for tendulkar, we wouldve lost this badly. Parth, stick to books, you really dont seem to understand cricket... Link to comment
Parth Posted August 31, 2007 Author Share Posted August 31, 2007 so what if he is a kid, my 9 year old nephew would know that if it wasnt for tendulkar, we wouldve lost this badly. Parth, stick to books, you really dont seem to understand cricket... So are you saying a 50 is alright in ODI cricket for his callibre, but if he batted more than we would have won easily. He practically gave his wicket to Pieterson. I would have been ok if he got out to a good ball but a short ball from a off spinner who has not bowled for 12 months is pathetic. Link to comment
King Tendulkar Posted August 31, 2007 Share Posted August 31, 2007 Parth you have lost it. Why dont you focus on other players not Sachin who is our top run scorer in this series and was top run scorer in SA series in SA as well. Wanting our top run scorer to retire is just stupid! Link to comment
Parth Posted August 31, 2007 Author Share Posted August 31, 2007 Lara = 38 Sachin = 34 38 - 34 = 4 years difference. Now did u get it? :cantstop: Tendulkar started at a much earlier age than Lara, and Tendulkar has played many more matches. Link to comment
Parth Posted August 31, 2007 Author Share Posted August 31, 2007 Parth you have lost it. Why dont you focus on other players not Sachin who is our top run scorer in this series and was top run scorer in SA series in SA as well. Wanting our top run scorer to retire is just stupid! Its true what Kapil says, Tendulkar doesn't have the abillity to win matces. Link to comment
Anakin Posted August 31, 2007 Share Posted August 31, 2007 Its true what Kapil says' date=' Tendulkar doesn't have the abillity to win matces.[/quote'] I'm glad you agree with Kapil, both of you have similar cricketing brain. Link to comment
simba28 Posted August 31, 2007 Share Posted August 31, 2007 parth he got out to an easy ball and dat was his bad.. how can u say hes not a match winner.. if he wud have gotten out earlier like gangu dravid and karthik India wud have been destroyed.. oh well why m i even bothering Link to comment
bear23 Posted August 31, 2007 Share Posted August 31, 2007 Dravid is the person to blame for this loss. Batting, captaincy were both horrible. Link to comment
Shehezaada Posted August 31, 2007 Share Posted August 31, 2007 I'm glad you agree with Kapil' date=' both of you have similar cricketing brain.[/quote'] Exactly...so Parth will come around and say....Dravid ne Ma Ka Dood Piya Hai! Sachin ne bakre ka pita hai! Link to comment
yoda Posted August 31, 2007 Share Posted August 31, 2007 So, who exactly here is defending Sachin's lame shot to a bowler named KP? Link to comment
Guest BossBhai Posted August 31, 2007 Share Posted August 31, 2007 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
yoda Posted August 31, 2007 Share Posted August 31, 2007 Lame shot ? 2 more yards and that was a sixer ... lame is when you give catching practice to close in fielders or get bowled thru the gate or get stumped by a yard ... to a rookie spinner ... wink wink nudge nudge ... No lame, because that ball had nothing in it. If you get bowled to a beauty or give catch to close in fielders off another beauty it won't be lame. Yes it should have been a six, but it was not. Link to comment
Guest BossBhai Posted August 31, 2007 Share Posted August 31, 2007 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now