Stats For "The Boss"

[kabira]

bheema you are fired!!!!!

[Guest BossBhai]

-- Removed on request of the user --

[theguyinallblue]

BheemBhai..लगे हांथो ...Ganguly ka bhi कत्चा चिथ्ठा ..nikal do.. lets see how he has scored his 11000 runs..:D

[Guest BossBhai]

-- Removed on request of the user --

[Guest BossBhai]

-- Removed on request of the user --

[Chandan]

Wow BB!! Good break-downs! But I agree with Holysmoke---Sachin needs to be dropped!

[Holysmoke]

umm.. i was being sarcastic...:eyedance: Sachin, and dropped from ODI team.. after how he's performed in last 2 months ????????

[Chandan]

umm.. i was being sarcastic...:eyedance: Sachin, and dropped from ODI team.. after how he's performed in last 2 months ????????

Oh yes!! Exactly after seeing how he performed in last 2 months!! Don't you think he should not have returned to ODI cricket after his 2005 injury??:P:D

[Guest BossBhai]

-- Removed on request of the user --

[Anakin]

Oh yes!! Exactly after seeing how he performed in last 2 months!! Don't you think he should not have returned to ODI cricket after his 2005 injury??:P:D

If he didn't Dravid's captaincy would've been over after the WC. Real shame that didn't happen though. He's clueless most of the times.

[Dravid_The_Best]

out of Tendulkar´s 81 50´s india has won 47 matches. but out of ganguly 69 50´s India has managed to win 39 matches. Out of Dravid´s 81 50´s india has also managed to win 47 matches. so stats show that tendulkars 50´s are equally valuable to dravid´s.because both has won 47 matches with thier 50´s. (for those who call Tendulkar bigger matchwinner than dravid). Mr.Ganguly´s winning percentage with 50 is slight better than both dravid and Tendulkar.

[Anakin]

What about 100s? And he is a bigger matchwinner, just go check how many MoMs in won matches.

[yoda]

who cares? we are down 1-3.

[Anakin]

who cares? we are down 1-3.

Yeah, drop him I say :two_thumbs_up:

[karina]

Awesome. Truly.

[Shehezaada]

great work bheembhai...but shouldn't the average including not outs be higher then the average excluding not outs?

[Guest BossBhai]

-- Removed on request of the user --

[Shehezaada]

What I meant was considering the not outs as outs (i.e including them in the denominator)... or excluding the not outs from the denominator (As is done traditionally)

pefect..good job bud!

[CC1981]

Here are some more stats about the Boss that is far more relevant today: Tendy in his last eight test series (minus minnows like BD) : 1. 70 runs @ 17.50 vs AUS ( 9th in average, 10th in total runs in the Indian side) 2. 55 runs @ 27.50 vs RSA( 6th in average, 5th in total runs) 3. 255 runs @ 51.00 vs PAK( 4th in average, 3rd in total runs) 4. 189 runs @ 37.80 vs SL ( 5th in average, 3rd in total runs) 5. 63 runs @ 21.00 vs PAK( 10th in average, 8th in total runs) 6. 83 runs @ 20.75 vs ENG(9th in average, 10th in total runs) 7. 199 runs @ 33.16 vs RSA(4th in average, 2nd in total runs) 8. 228 runs @ 38.00 vs ENG(6th in average, 3rd in total runs) ============================ As the record shows, Sachin is a faded master in Tests, his time is over and he is no longer batting like a great or even a good batsman- more like a poor batsman who used to be great. He fails to average above 40 in 7 out of 8 series against decent opposition (and that too, in this day and age, where batting is easy, bowling quality is $hit and nothing like the 90s), he fails to top the average sheet or the total runs sheet for a series from the Indian side even once and the most he gets to is either middle of the table or near the bottom. Guy needs to realize that he was a great batsman, he now IS a poor batsman, worse than 25-30 others in the world easily and he needs to RETIRE from test cricket instead of simply playing for the sake of test records.

[Anakin]

Once again, playing with the same numbers without much context. And it'll be a total waste of time, so not gonna engage into it again.