Magnificient Warne

[Guest BossBhai]

-- Removed on request of the user --

[Guest dada_rocks]

this one needs to be at the top along side murali thread

[apocalypse]

Two monkeys are getting limelight just because of people's jealousy :D

[Bongosamaj]

Warne doesn't have to prove anything against Bangladesh...if anything, it adds more weight to his stats, since it is not inflated by easy opposition.

[Anakin]

Warne doesn't have to prove anything against Bangladesh...if anything' date=' it adds more weight to his stats, since it is not inflated by easy opposition.[/quote']Yes INDEED, the english are mighty strong players of spin.

[Bongosamaj]

Yes INDEED' date=' the english are mighty strong players of spin.[/quote'] Stronger than Bangladesh/Zimbabwe...and Murali too has played against England. And unlike Kumble, Warne atleast can take wickets in England. Kumble meanwhile gets owned in England...England arn't that bad at playing spin actually, unless the surface is really assisting spinners.

[Anakin]

Stronger than Bangladesh/Zimbabwe...and Murali too has played against England.

Oh really

[Bongosamaj]

Oh really

yes really.

[Guest BossBhai]

-- Removed on request of the user --

[Bongosamaj]

we learn something new everyday ..... dont we Anakin :giggle: :D

Pity you don't understand enough cricket to see for yourself that England is far far better than Bangladesh when it comes to playing cricket- in every department. But hey, you are the same guy who used to argue 'Kumble > Warne', so we all know how much of cricket you understand.

[Guest Hiten.]

Pity you don't understand enough cricket to see for yourself that England is far far better than Bangladesh when it comes to playing cricket- in every department. But hey, you are the same guy who used to argue 'Kumble > Warne', so we all know how much of cricket you understand.

But how funny is the fact that on the BEST TURNING tracks in the world, Warne failed miserably tries after tries. India is known to carry players who can handle spin pretty comfortably, why couldn't warnie sprinkle his magic then ? Is it safe for us to say that Warne picks on batsmen who cant play spin well ? :giggle: Whatever your answer is, it might be the same for Kumble not picking up wickets vs Eng in Eng

[Anakin]

Pity you don't understand enough cricket to see for yourself that England is far far better than Bangladesh when it comes to playing cricket- in every department. But hey, you are the same guy who used to argue 'Kumble > Warne', so we all know how much of cricket you understand.

:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:At least I don't worship druggy who takes money from bookies and then pretends he's more innocent than a newly born baby. But hey, since you understand cricket so much, let me not disturb you. After all it was all the fat buoy's mom's fault :giggle:

[Bongosamaj]

At least I don't worship druggy who takes money from bookies and then pretends he's more innocent than a newly born baby.

Druggie, matchfixer etc. or not, fact is, he is the best damn leggie in the last 30-40 years of test cricket. A good role model he aint, but the best damn leggie he definitely is.

[Anakin]

But how funny is the fact that on the BEST TURNING tracks in the world, Warne failed miserably tries after tries. India is known to carry players who can handle spin pretty comfortably, why couldn't warnie sprinkle his magic then ? Whatever your answer is, it might be the same for Kumble not picking up wickets vs Eng in Eng

Since you obviously don't have any logic or knowledge of cricket, Indian's are not that good players of spin. In fact it just shows how Murali troubled the minnow indians while the fat buoy murdered the English, the great country of the one of the greatest spinners ever, Giles.

[Anakin]

Druggie, matchfixer etc. or not, fact is, he is the best damn leggie in the last 30-40 years of test cricket. A good role model he aint, but the best damn leggie he definitely is.

Yes, with drugs in his system ie

[Bongosamaj]

But how funny is the fact that on the BEST TURNING tracks in the world, Warne failed miserably tries after tries. India is known to carry players who can handle spin pretty comfortably, why couldn't warnie sprinkle his magic then ?

Indians are the best at playing spin- Saqqi apart, no other spinner has succeeded against India in the last 15-20 yrs. Both Murali and Warney has failed. But both Murali and Warney have DOMINATED England in England while Kumble has been pretty mediocre.

[Bongosamaj]

Yes' date=' with drugs in his system ie[/quote'] Drugs in his system or not, he is still the best damn leggie- he was best damn leggie before taking drugs, he was the best damn leggie after taking drugs. Period.

[Guest Hiten.]

Since you obviously don't have any logic or knowledge of cricket' date=' Indian's are not that good players of spin. In fact it just shows [b']how Murali troubled the minnow indians while the fat buoy murdered the English, the great country of the one of the greatest spinners ever, Giles.

LoL... murali didn't flare that good to vs India in tests. He was mediocre whenever he faced Indian batsmen. But certainly he did a lot better than Warnie

[Bongosamaj]

But certainly he did a lot better than Warnie

He did a lot better in SL where SL prepares square-turners, unlike OZ, who don't prepare spinning wickets when India goes over there. Both their records suck in India. Anyway, my point was, England is not such a bad player of spin, or else Kumble wouldn't be clueless in England!

[Anakin]

LoL... murali didn't flare that good to vs India in tests. He was mediocre whenever he faced Indian batsmen. But certainly he did a lot better than Warnie

He did fairly well even in the last tour IIRC. Picked up SRT too, although dubious decision. And again, it's relative to SW.