Guest BossBhai Posted November 18, 2007 Share Posted November 18, 2007 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
Guest dada_rocks Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 this one needs to be at the top along side murali thread Link to comment
apocalypse Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 Two monkeys are getting limelight just because of people's jealousy :D Link to comment
Bongosamaj Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 Warne doesn't have to prove anything against Bangladesh...if anything, it adds more weight to his stats, since it is not inflated by easy opposition. Link to comment
Anakin Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 Warne doesn't have to prove anything against Bangladesh...if anything' date=' it adds more weight to his stats, since it is not inflated by easy opposition.[/quote']Yes INDEED, the english are mighty strong players of spin. Link to comment
Bongosamaj Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 Yes INDEED' date=' the english are mighty strong players of spin.[/quote'] Stronger than Bangladesh/Zimbabwe...and Murali too has played against England. And unlike Kumble, Warne atleast can take wickets in England. Kumble meanwhile gets owned in England...England arn't that bad at playing spin actually, unless the surface is really assisting spinners. Link to comment
Anakin Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 Stronger than Bangladesh/Zimbabwe...and Murali too has played against England.Oh really Link to comment
Bongosamaj Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 Oh really yes really. Link to comment
Guest BossBhai Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
Bongosamaj Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 we learn something new everyday ..... dont we Anakin :giggle: :D Pity you don't understand enough cricket to see for yourself that England is far far better than Bangladesh when it comes to playing cricket- in every department. But hey, you are the same guy who used to argue 'Kumble > Warne', so we all know how much of cricket you understand. Link to comment
Guest Hiten. Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 Pity you don't understand enough cricket to see for yourself that England is far far better than Bangladesh when it comes to playing cricket- in every department. But hey, you are the same guy who used to argue 'Kumble > Warne', so we all know how much of cricket you understand. But how funny is the fact that on the BEST TURNING tracks in the world, Warne failed miserably tries after tries. India is known to carry players who can handle spin pretty comfortably, why couldn't warnie sprinkle his magic then ? Is it safe for us to say that Warne picks on batsmen who cant play spin well ? :giggle: Whatever your answer is, it might be the same for Kumble not picking up wickets vs Eng in Eng Link to comment
Anakin Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 Pity you don't understand enough cricket to see for yourself that England is far far better than Bangladesh when it comes to playing cricket- in every department. But hey, you are the same guy who used to argue 'Kumble > Warne', so we all know how much of cricket you understand.:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:At least I don't worship druggy who takes money from bookies and then pretends he's more innocent than a newly born baby. But hey, since you understand cricket so much, let me not disturb you. After all it was all the fat buoy's mom's fault :giggle: Link to comment
Bongosamaj Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 At least I don't worship druggy who takes money from bookies and then pretends he's more innocent than a newly born baby. Druggie, matchfixer etc. or not, fact is, he is the best damn leggie in the last 30-40 years of test cricket. A good role model he aint, but the best damn leggie he definitely is. Link to comment
Anakin Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 But how funny is the fact that on the BEST TURNING tracks in the world, Warne failed miserably tries after tries. India is known to carry players who can handle spin pretty comfortably, why couldn't warnie sprinkle his magic then ? Whatever your answer is, it might be the same for Kumble not picking up wickets vs Eng in EngSince you obviously don't have any logic or knowledge of cricket, Indian's are not that good players of spin. In fact it just shows how Murali troubled the minnow indians while the fat buoy murdered the English, the great country of the one of the greatest spinners ever, Giles. Link to comment
Anakin Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 Druggie, matchfixer etc. or not, fact is, he is the best damn leggie in the last 30-40 years of test cricket. A good role model he aint, but the best damn leggie he definitely is.Yes, with drugs in his system ie Link to comment
Bongosamaj Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 But how funny is the fact that on the BEST TURNING tracks in the world, Warne failed miserably tries after tries. India is known to carry players who can handle spin pretty comfortably, why couldn't warnie sprinkle his magic then ? Indians are the best at playing spin- Saqqi apart, no other spinner has succeeded against India in the last 15-20 yrs. Both Murali and Warney has failed. But both Murali and Warney have DOMINATED England in England while Kumble has been pretty mediocre. Link to comment
Bongosamaj Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 Yes' date=' with drugs in his system ie[/quote'] Drugs in his system or not, he is still the best damn leggie- he was best damn leggie before taking drugs, he was the best damn leggie after taking drugs. Period. Link to comment
Guest Hiten. Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 Since you obviously don't have any logic or knowledge of cricket' date=' Indian's are not that good players of spin. In fact it just shows [b']how Murali troubled the minnow indians while the fat buoy murdered the English, the great country of the one of the greatest spinners ever, Giles. LoL... murali didn't flare that good to vs India in tests. He was mediocre whenever he faced Indian batsmen. But certainly he did a lot better than Warnie Link to comment
Bongosamaj Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 But certainly he did a lot better than Warnie He did a lot better in SL where SL prepares square-turners, unlike OZ, who don't prepare spinning wickets when India goes over there. Both their records suck in India. Anyway, my point was, England is not such a bad player of spin, or else Kumble wouldn't be clueless in England! Link to comment
Anakin Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 LoL... murali didn't flare that good to vs India in tests. He was mediocre whenever he faced Indian batsmen. But certainly he did a lot better than WarnieHe did fairly well even in the last tour IIRC. Picked up SRT too, although dubious decision. And again, it's relative to SW. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now