Jump to content

Srinivasan,Raj Kundra named in IPL scandal report


Recommended Posts

Police already had evidence that Meyappan did the betting. Why should it jump the normal courts route and get to SC? There was no need for SC to intervene with the Mudgal committee' date= much like it was done in case of the players involved with spot fixing. Whatever happened to those spot fixing cases anyways?
That is a call to be taken by the highest court of the country and by the most eminent jurists of the country and not by anonymous posters on a forum.
Link to comment
Police already had evidence that Meyappan did the betting. Why should it jump the normal courts route and get to SC? There was no need for SC to intervene with the Mudgal committee, much like it was done in case of the players involved with spot fixing. Whatever happened to those spot fixing cases anyways?
You've again got to be kidding me. The police didn't jump the normal courts but a PIL was filed in the SC. Please take some time to read up the timeline - both legal and other facts.
Link to comment
DM' date=' AFAIK, BCCI itself went to SC against a lower court order and shot in the foot...[/quote'] I stand partly corrected. Cricket Association of Bihar filed a PIL in Bombay HC (not in the SC) against the IPL probe panel. Bombay HC declared the panel illegal and then BCCI moved SC.
Link to comment
fSibal sought to defend Srinivasan, saying a large number of other eminent people like Sunil Gavaskar, Sachin Tandulkar, Saurav Ganguly and Anil Kumble were similarly placed in conflict of interest situation but he (Srinivasan) was being targeted as some people want to keep him outside the apex cricketing body.
http://ibnlive.in.com/news/cricketnext/difficult-to-ignore-n-srinivasans-conflict-of-interest-says-supreme-court/517114-78.html Sibal conveniently forgot most powerful and active cricketer :cantstop:
Link to comment
Option 1: Srinivasan can step aside and disciplinary committee can decide punishment Option 2: IPL governing council can decide what to do Option 3: Two independent judges can be appointed. Option 4: The Mudgal Committee can decide punishment
Options :phehehe:
Link to comment
Option 1: Srinivasan can step aside and disciplinary committee can decide punishment Option 2: IPL governing council can decide what to do Option 3: Two independent judges can be appointed. Option 4: The Mudgal Committee can decide punishment Options :phehehe:
I'll have 2, please. Thank you
Link to comment

Srinivasan, Stuart Binny, Raj Kundra named in IPL scandal report

Why can't the SC give the punishment and move on?
Why should SC do the work BCCI is supposed to do? The BCCI should give the punishment and then SC will monitor of its sufficient. SC's job is the uphold the law, not make executive decisions on behalf of the BCCI.
Link to comment

Utkarsh Anand ‏@utkarsh_aanand #IPL: Srinivasan pleads SC to set up a panel independent of BCCI to decide conflict of interest & punishment, if any. @IndianExpress Utkarsh Anand ‏@utkarsh_aanand #IPL: Srinivasan says he'd not associate with BCCI till new panel finishes its probe over his alleged conflict of interest.@IndianExpress

Link to comment

ANI ‏@ANI_news IPL Spot fixing case: N Srinivasan suggests 5 options to SC, Option 1- BCCI’s internal disciplinary committee may look after the issue..cntd ANI ‏@ANI_news 2. BCCI may nominate a committee of 2 independent experts, 3. Court may appoint a disciplinary committee...cntd ANI ‏@ANI_news 4. Court may appoint a committee of 2 judicial officers, 5. Mudgal Committee itself may decide on the course of action or punishment

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...