Guest dada_rocks Posted December 9, 2007 Share Posted December 9, 2007 http://www.ibnlive.com/news/sonia-gets-ec-notice-for-death-merchant-remark/53889-3.html hope the media guys now muster enough cajones and show those clips of these conress luminaries.. so far I havebeen bombbarded with modi video clip non-stop not once sonia maino's and digvijay singh's video shown yet.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kumble_rocks Posted December 9, 2007 Share Posted December 9, 2007 Why doesn't Modi take her to court ? Me thinks he lacks the intestinal fortitude to go the democratic route of using courts !:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest dada_rocks Posted December 9, 2007 Share Posted December 9, 2007 How do u think this EC notice came.... Same question why doesn't congress and people like u take Modi to court u guys have ben crying for close to 6 years now.. :hysterical:.. got enough time to gather evidence if any in support of the crap being peddled day in day out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest dada_rocks Posted December 9, 2007 Share Posted December 9, 2007 BTW what happened to I am against every bad thing and say yes Ec is right to serve Sonia Maino noticeinstead of changing the topic.. kahte hai na kahne se kuchh nahin hota ki ham congressi nahin hai aapke actions bata dete hain ki aap kya hain:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest dada_rocks Posted December 9, 2007 Share Posted December 9, 2007 Chandn Mitra puts everything in perspective ..:two_thumbs_up: http://dailypioneer.com/columnist1.asp?main_variable=Columnist&file_name=mitra%2Fmitra281%2Etxt&writer=mitra With Sohrabuddin, the Gujarat-bashers believed they finally hit the jackpot. Indeed, they appear to have successfully fixed DG Vanzara, the fearless encounter specialist who apparently did not believe in exchanging Anglo-Saxon pleasantries with terrorists or arranging gourmet meals including biryani for them in jail, the way a previous Government in Delhi did with ISI-backed Kashmiri terrorists at the Hazratbal shrine. Vanzara's colleagues subsequently let him down, for even if his methods of tackling terror cannot be condoned his nationalist motives are above reproach. It is reminiscent of the way human rights-wallahs hounded Amarjit Singh Sandhu, SSP Amritsar in the heyday of Khalistani terrorism, once he had liquidated the enemies of India in the district under his command. In Punjab, not a single terrorist was convicted by the courts even under a draconian TADA but the same courts relentlessly pursued cases against Sandhu to the point where he was driven to penury and eventual suicide. Shame shame shame As for the repeated reminder that the police must not get trigger happy and adhere strictly to the law of the land, the case of Parliament attacker Afzal Guru mocks at the face of jurisprudence. His death sentence has been confirmed by the Supreme Court, but our prim and proper Home Minister says it may take up to seven years before he is executed! A simple question: Why? If vote-bank politics shamelessly intrudes into the sphere of justice, as it has brazenly done in the Afzal case, why must Narendra Modi be singled out in the Sohrabuddin matter? And have we forgotten the price the country paid for the red carpet treatment the Government gave Azhar Masood in a jail in Kashmir? Don't we all know what he has been up to since we ferried him back to his Taliban masters in Kandahar in the final days of the last millennium? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest dada_rocks Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 The Election Commission acted with alacrity by sending a notice to Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi over his comment on the Sohrabuddin Sheikh encounter case at an election rally in Gujarat. But the three EC members were divided over issuing a notice to Congress president Sonia Gandhi for her "merchant of death" comment. While chief election commissioner N. Gopalaswami did think about sending a direct notice to Sonia Gandhi, his two colleagues — Navin Chawla and S.Y. Qureshi — felt differently. They felt that a report from the district authorities and EC observers should be sought first, and then the EC should deliberate on the official position taken by the Congress before sending a direct notice to Sonia Gandhi. They felt that the EC — especially after assertions made by Congress spokesman Abhishek Singhvi — needed to look into whether Sonia meant Narendra Modi when she made the comment. But now a consensus has emerged and a notice has been sent to Sonia. The EC also has to assess whether it should link Narendra Modi’s comments with Sonia’s and thus fall into the BJP trap. PS: Chawla is the same congress crook whose induction into election commisison was vociferously opposed by all non-congress member . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts