Jump to content

Sharjah-Harjah

Members L2
  • Posts

    384
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Sharjah-Harjah

  1. Again, none of what I said that indicates people cannot cope without it. But it’s simply untrue to say that it’s just another national game. It’s the most watched game by Indians. The grounds are full of Indians.
  2. Toh ICC match ka paisa fund nai kerta terrorism?
  3. Don’t mix formats. In T20s, India has lost 2 out of last 4 games against Pakistan, and even the ones it has won, it was very close. its in ODIs, where games have been one sided. in any case, Indians enjoying winning and dominating Pakistan. The viewership of such games has benefited due to one sided nature
  4. lol toh sala Pakistan India mai khelay toh terrorism fund nai hota? MCG mai khelay toh fund nai hoga? ICC to fir bhi fund kerta hai Pakistan ko , match kahin bhi ho ICC has offered full payment to Pakistan to host ICc champions trophy hybrid model. If money is the main reason, Pakistan would have accepted it. But the whole r**** Rona is because India will play Pakistan in ICC and ACC event anywhere but Pakistan, takay kuch bol sakay “we are though on terror haven”
  5. You are right about misinformation. It’s India games that are most viewed, but pak vs India is the most viewed games generally speaking. Maybe a few games are viewed more than that. however one cannot say that Indians don’t care about Pakistan India cricket match. That’s not true. In fact it’s the opposite. If Pakistan turns up more, specially in ODIs, it has a path to even more viewership.
  6. Why did BCCI and Indian govt keep quite until 3 months before the tournament. They should have just said no right away when original MOU was signed. It would have avoided the entire drama and controversy. Or is the drama and controversy needed to posture and show “we are tough on terror haven”.
  7. Lolol hahaha sai hai bhai tu theek hai
  8. The entire thing was finalized no? 3 months they are waking up. When ICC awarded the tournament years ago, all parties signed on it right
  9. I never said that BCCI or Indian cricket cannot survive without Pakistan. Only a fool would think that. All i said was that Modi government is posturing to get votes. and I am not jealous of India’s economic growth; however it’s nuanced growth. The Human Dev Index, poverty, inequality and education metrics are still pretty bad and marginally better than Pakistan’s, there are some big winners in the Indian economy which paper over the crack. It’s by no means a shared and equal growth. one can only fool people who haven’t studied economics. as for vaccinating, it’s true there are bad apples, but they are kept on sidelines. Pakistan consistently elects non-religious parties to office. Pakistani leaders do not **** talk Hindus to get elected into office. The real extremism is what is happening in India. You are ELECTING an extremist manifesto to office, as evident by statements by your PM calling a significant minority “infiltrators”.. what I was envious of was the secular and democratic India and wished Pakistan was the same. However, today I am glad that I was not born in this India after looking at what has happened with it. You will know in 20 or 30 years what has happened. Even Pakistan grew 8% during Zia and Musharraf regime. Growth is not everything and you will soon find out.
  10. Jis nai yeh batwara kia, Chura ghopa, aur sab ka kat gaya Acha hota hai united he rehtay toh sala exploit nai hotay. But an bhi waqt hai
  11. If India and Pakistan cricket doesn’t matter, then why do so many Indians tune to watch it. Prove it with your eyeballs. Otherwise you’re just making statements out of your a** this forum cricket fans explodes on India Pakistan games
  12. The delusion is glaring. What’s the most-watched game in India? Which game pulled in 500 million viewers from India—nearly half the country? The issue with some tech companies rising in India, along with a few billionaires, is the growing arrogance and detachment from reality. Statements like “We don’t care about Pakistan,” “Pakistan is irrelevant,” or “Pakistan has nothing to offer” are ironic when games Pakistan loses receive more views and likes than those it wins—all thanks to the “love” from across the border. Bhai, duniya mein ajao! Reality mai ajao
  13. You’re basically agreeing with me, just in a roundabout way. If cricket truly doesn’t matter in the grand scheme of things (which I agree with), why has India been creating all this drama on the world stage? The ICC awarded hosting rights to Pakistan, which BCCI must have initially approved. So why not just honor the contract and play? To your point, it’s “just another game with just another team,” right? Yet all this chaos suggests India *does* care—more specifically, BJP’s power centers care. They’re using this as a tool to project being “tough on terrorist havens.” As Modi’s popularity declines, expect the drama to escalate further. This isn’t about cricket; it’s about optics.
  14. lol samjh kisi ko fir bhi nahi arahi. Pakistan sai cricket nai khelaingai… kya ukhadliya? Kuch nahi ukhada. Nuksan sirf cricket fans ka hua aur faida politician ka!
  15. Change will come through people-to-people connections, not political posturing. For over three decades, India’s policy of refusing to play cricket with Pakistan has achieved nothing. The Pakistani establishment and its proxies operate as usual, and cricket bans do nothing to address terrorism—issues far beyond the sport's influence. This policy is misguided, isolating ordinary people and fueling resentment. Real change requires common people to demand peace and dismantle anti-peace forces, but such policies only strengthen India’s image as a bully, deepening divides and stifling unity. Ultimately, it helps no one except politicians looking to distract and divide for electoral gains.
  16. lol the arrogance may be busted this time. No Pakistan/India —> No ICC —> no international cricket —> then enjoy IPL, other leagues and occasional series that will still have viability like the BGT.
  17. The ICC's long-term survival would be difficult without India and Pakistan playing each other. While the ICC could still generate revenue, losing these matches could slash overall earnings by 20-30%. Considering most businesses operate with profit margins below 30%, such a loss could make ICC tournaments financially unviable. Without full financial transparency, it’s hard to say definitively, but few organizations can survive a 30% revenue cut. Bilateral cricket, which often barely breaks even for many nations, wouldn’t be enough to sustain the current model. Beyond finances, the excitement of international cricket would take a major hit. Some argue the "rivalry" has waned and become one-sided, specially in recent ODIs, but rivalries tend to ebb and flow. Who knows how the dynamic might evolve 10, 30, or even 50 years from now?
  18. I get where you’re coming from and completely agree—these organizations should be banned, eliminated, and everyone responsible for 26/11 must face justice. That said, it’s not as straightforward as it seems. Demands like extraditing specific individuals or sharing lists aren’t the only solutions; we need pragmatic, politically feasible approaches. Just like in India, where politics often caters to nationalist and extreme agendas, Pakistan faces its own challenges and sensitivities, making it difficult to act decisively on these groups without facing serious repercussions. India’s hardline stance often feels like political posturing for domestic audiences rather than a real push for peace. If peace and prosperity are truly the goal, India could focus on building bridges—through trade, sports, and cultural exchanges—instead of reinforcing its “regional bully” image that neighbors frequently criticize. After all, the Olympics were created to foster unity and peace, and that same spirit could help in South Asia too with cricket .
  19. FATF is a credible body. It’s possible it doesn’t meet all the concerns, but it is very ironic and telling how it continues to be ignored and hidden in the news.
  20. We are suffering because of that. And you have no idea how lucky India was to have a secular and democratic governance under Congress
  21. I support actions by the Indian government to draw the line on terrorism. There should be no space for terrorism. I also do not think it’s fair to say “politics should stay out of sport” and I support India’s stand on not playing cricket. My concern is the politicization and exploitation of the issue by the right wing nationalist politicians. To satisfy FATF, which is the neutral body on terrorism, Pakistan passed laws to curb terror financing, froze assets, and arrested members of groups like JeM and LET. Increased prosecutions and regular progress reports demonstrated compliance, leading to its removal from the FATF grey list in 2022, though FATF urges continued vigilance. However, there is ZERO coverage of these steps in the Indian media, which makes one question the intent when progress is not/never acknowledged. Don’t forget, the perpetrators of Samjhota express terror attack, in which 40 Pakistani nationals were killed was never investigated or brought to justice. However there is never a single mention of that anywhere either, and most Indians brush it aside as if it never happened.
  22. I repeatedly see a lot of arrogance on this thread about “failed state”, “Jahil”, “what has Pakistan to offer”, “economic and military power”. Accuracy of the economic growth numbers India claims are questioned by Indian economists themselves, not me. Here are some key economic indicators: Global Hunger Index: - India: 105th - Pakistan: 102nd Press Freedom Index: - India: 159th - Pakistan: 152nd Poverty: - India: 22% below the poverty line - Pakistan: 24% below the poverty line Education Index: - India: 133rd (0.56) - Pakistan: 141st (0.52) In reality, it doesn’t appear to be all that world beating to me? beyond hateful agendas and arrogance that benefit politicians alone, a friendly relationship with Pakistan could help ordinary Indias by boosting regional peace, opening up trade routes to Central Asia, and creating energy partnerships. Plus, both countries could spend less on defense and focus more on growth and development. It’d be a win-win for stability and prosperity in the region.
  23. As a Pakistani, I had hope for regional peace and prosperity. However reading this thread, it appears a distant dream. a decade of brainwashing by the BJP and “independent media” has worsened the equation after mega stupidities by Pakistani establishment. The irony is unmistakable when the average human forgets what’s best for them.
  24. Anyway, its strange the ignorance of some of the posters. India’s specific demands from Pakistan include prosecuting terrorist leaders (like Hafiz Saeed and Masood Azhar), shutting down terrorist organizations such as Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), and preventing cross-border terrorism. To address these demands, Pakistan has taken several actions, such as arresting Hafiz Saeed and sentencing him on terrorism financing charges, officially banning groups like LeT and JeM, and strengthening anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing frameworks to comply with FATF requirements. In response, FATF removed Pakistan from its grey list in 2022. And the world has acknowledged the improvements with the ICC event happening in 3 months. But obviously, Pakistanis cannot make Bollywood movies showing these improvements and changes, nor can they can intimidate and buy out the Indian media to push their narrative.
  25. Fair. But again, the optics of is that India will be alone in UAE, which makes India look isolated. It’s like that kid in the neighborhood who takes the bat home because they were given out wrongly according to them
×
×
  • Create New...