Guest BossBhai Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
guju24 Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 good stats bossbhai...thx for sharing it... Link to comment
yoda Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 Below is a simple table that tells how many lbws the hometeam gets for every 10 wkts taken and how many the opposition takes against the hometeam. No surprises as to who is the leader when it comes to fewer lbws against its batsmen when playing at home i.e Aus ... only 1.5 when compared to 2.01 for the opposition. The stats for this decade. [B]Country HomeLbws/Inngs Opplbws/Inngs[/B] Australia 1.50 2.01* South Africa 1.74 1.29 Sri Lanka 2.01 2.56 India 2.04 1.97 England 2.11 2.30 West Indies 2.16 1.82 Pakistan 2.17 2.34 Bangladesh 2.25 2.22 Zimbabwe 2.26 1.69 New Zealand 2.82 1.54 * Bucknor 1.01, Rest 1 Link to comment
Guest BossBhai Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
DesiChap Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 :hysterical:@yoda Excellent stats BB Link to comment
Donny Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 Simple indeed, Bossby. Clearly indicates the better technique of Aussie batsmen. Link to comment
DesiChap Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 Yep Donny The technique looks very good on the Radio Link to comment
Donny Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 Radio, TV, internet, bush telegraph, podcasts, Morse code, reruns ... makes no difference. Bossby's stats have again shown up his shallow perspective. Link to comment
Anakin Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 Simple indeed' date=' Bossby. Clearly indicates the better technique of Aussie batsmen.[/quote'] :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: Link to comment
Bumper Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 Great stats Boss. The obvious defense would be "superior technique". Can you get the stats on how many LBWs go against Aussies, when they play away. That will help us understand if there is merit to the argument that Aussies get most decisions in their favor at home. Link to comment
Donny Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 Nice to see another deep, well though out, erudite reply from Anakin. :regular_smile: Link to comment
gs Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 Yep Donny The technique looks very good on the Radio :haha::haha::haha: Link to comment
Donny Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 Not good enough, gs. You have to do at least 8 to get a direct critique. Anyone can do 1, 2 or 3 emoticons and write nothing. There are thousands of such posts in ICF. Link to comment
Anakin Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 Nice to see another deep' date=' well though out, erudite reply from Anakin. :regular_smile:[/quote']The best your BS deserves Link to comment
bunny Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 I think we need home and away stats for each team. (similar to how the statsguru career summary works). Then we will have a good idea. Link to comment
Ram Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 BB, are the stats for LBWs/10 wickets or LBWs/Innings ? Link to comment
Guest BossBhai Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
Guest BossBhai Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 -- Removed on request of the user -- Link to comment
Bumper Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 Good point Bumps. Except in NZ , WI & SAF ... everywhere else Aus have a higher lbw/Innings ratio in this decade. [B]HomeTeam AusLBW/Inngs[/B] Bangladesh 2.63 Technique ? :D Good work. NZ & SA are seamer's paradise, so the stats make sense. LBW stats in WI may be attributable to WI's dominance in the 70s, 80s. Link to comment
Ram Posted January 11, 2008 Share Posted January 11, 2008 for lbw/10wkts ... and I assume 10wkts = one inngs just for simplicity. There is a big difference between LBWs/Innings and LBWs/10 wickets. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now