Zap_Brannigan Posted January 30, 2008 Share Posted January 30, 2008 I want technology used for everything including for LBWs. Even if they are not accurate, atleast they will be consistent. Reg. India benefiting from umpiring, Like every nation that has played this game, they have gotten some wron decisions in their favor as well but does 5 decisions like that in a series make up for 20 other decisions that go against us? Link to comment
Pancho Posted January 30, 2008 Share Posted January 30, 2008 I want technology used for everything including for LBWs. Even if they are not accurate, atleast they will be consistent. Reg. India benefiting from umpiring, Like every nation that has played this game, they have gotten some wron decisions in their favor as well but does 5 decisions like that in a series make up for 20 other decisions that go against us? i agree with you on the technology. as i said im not interested in balancing out favourable decisions vs unfavourable and creating a scoreboard. i wasnt saying that bad ones make up for all the good ones you get etc. i asked you if you supported tech. and you said yes. what im saying is, until the ICC move towards that, there is no point going on and on and on about umpiring mistakes. because they are going to happen. they are human beings that make mistakes. like all of us. Link to comment
Zap_Brannigan Posted January 30, 2008 Share Posted January 30, 2008 So unless China frees tibet we shouldn't be protesting about their human rights record in Tibet? Link to comment
Pancho Posted January 30, 2008 Share Posted January 30, 2008 dont be over dramatic. india lost the series. not the umpires. you didnt pick sehwag. your batsman crumbled at the SCG. you didnt get 20 bad decisions. the umpires didnt cause you to get belted over the MCG on boxing day. whining about the umpiring after you lost the series is poor form. get over it, and look at the real reasons you lost the series. Link to comment
Zap_Brannigan Posted January 30, 2008 Share Posted January 30, 2008 Aus had 30 wickets in sydney while Ind got only 15......So wht if we didnt pick sehwag or lost 3 wickets in 1 over? we still took more wickets than you and would have easily got more runs too. we were talking abt biased umpiring even before this series began. Link to comment
The Outsider Posted January 30, 2008 Share Posted January 30, 2008 your batsman crumbled at the SCG. you didnt get 20 bad decisions. Not 20, but we got 10. So India are expected to STFU till they get 20 wrong decisions in a test? Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now