bharat297 Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 Its a huge risk ... and I am undecided on this issue here. Sreesanth on his day could rip through Australia and provide the wicket taking ball when it is required. However of late his form has not been good and has been extremely expensive. He is someone that when everything goes right, he becomes almost unplayable. However, when everything goes wrong, they go terribly, terribly wrong. Is it worth the gamble. Please vote, and share your thoughts. Link to comment
Desi Cartman Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 I would play him only if the conditions suit him .. if its NOT swinging then he aint playing Link to comment
The Outsider Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 I would definitely play him at Sydney because it does swing there in the 2nd innings, but opening the bowling with him is a risky proposition with one or two bad overs that can end up costing us the match as it happened in the last match against the Aussies. Link to comment
Kartikey Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 If we play 5 bowlers, then yes he has to play ahead of Munaf. Link to comment
eternalhope Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 I will select him anyday ahead of Munaf, though he is erratic. But the new ball should be shared by IS and PK followed by SS and IP. How I wish RP Singh was available. If he was, I would consider India favourites to win the finals. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now