Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

ok so thats all this thread is talking abt..i clicked to see if there was a special description abt him or abt one of his famous knocks..but stating the obvious :dontknow:

Posted
Don rama' date='pls dont show ur ignorance...nobody Mentiond tENDulkars name...read S L 0 W L Y,THINK, THEN REPLY... A hole[/quote'] Then wat's special in the OP?
Posted

dsr you the only person in the world that thinks that tENDulkar is the greatest...If he is the best why isnt he ave 99.94??? PLEASE DONT SHOW YOUR IGNORANCE...NOW stop smoking crack...

Posted
dsr you the only person in the world that thinks that tENDulkar is the greatest...If he is the best why isnt he ave 99.94??? PLEASE DONT SHOW YOUR IGNORANCE...NOW stop smoking crack...
1. He isnt the only person in the world 2. Bradman does not have many things that Sachin has.
Posted
dsr you the only person in the world that thinks that tENDulkar is the greatest...If he is the best why isnt he ave 99.94??? PLEASE DONT SHOW YOUR IGNORANCE...NOW stop smoking crack...
and you are the only person in the world who thinks Sachin is not a great batsman.
Posted
dsr you the only person in the world that thinks that tENDulkar is the greatest...If he is the best why isnt he ave 99.94??? PLEASE DONT SHOW YOUR IGNORANCE...NOW stop smoking crack...
It seems I am not the only person in the world! You can just look at stats or look behind the stats! I have seen clips of WG Grace batting and Jack Hobbs. 2 great legends, seeing them bat was hysterical, they made Devon Malcolmn look class! Bradman played in a non competitive era. No cricket comunity like now with great players from world over. He was never tested in subcontinenet or Windies etc. He only had to play against england. Seen videos of him batting, he would average single digits in modern era. All credit to Bradman, legend and great in his era! But to compare him to Sachin and the greats over last 30 years is folly! Sachin is the greatest!
Posted

DB never faced quality bowling attacks such as the likes of pakistan with akram and younis or mustaq. west indian bowling attack like ambrise, walsh and marshall. Spinners like murali and warne. Besides that its very hard to pick who woud be better

Posted

I knew it would get down to this the moment this thread started ... There is no doubt that Bradman was a legend of his time, but for heaven's sake he only played against two oppositions, England (who would have been crappy as always) and South Africa, Would it be right to compare the two coz the two have come from two different generations Sir Don should be compared to someone like Wally Hammond and Sachin to someone like Lara, comparing them would just resemble a situation which is totally hypothetical Sir Don Bradman - The Stone age Maestro Sir Sachin Tendulkar - The Modern age Genius

Posted
No Sachin is! Bradman never played in India and really only had to compete with england who were the only decent oppo at the time. Sachin is the greatest!
Vatz, Sachin HIMSELF said that he is nowhere as good as Bradman. ANd when it comes to matters of cricket, Sachin's opinions mean a helluva lot more than a one-eyed jingoistic fan's. Bradman's the best because he dominated whereever he played, whomever he played, day in day out, without fail. And your whole 'he didnt face quality bowlers' contention falls flat by the simple fact that Bradman batted on FAR harder pitches than Sachin. I hope you realize that its the PITCH AND THE BOWLING that makes the batsman do all the work...Sehwag on a square turning Mumbai is far harder to face than a Kumble on a pancake flat Antigua. Plus if Bradman's times were so easy, how come no one else dominated like he did...in his time too there were 1 or 2 players averaging 50+ with the bat....just like today..but NOBODY averaged even 60+, let alone 99...Bradman is the best there ever was as far as batsmanship goes...and no amount of indian pride will change that fact.
×
×
  • Create New...