Rajiv Posted October 10, 2008 Posted October 10, 2008 Isn't it, or almost inside the proximity of the border? so how is it different than what Obama says that he will enter Pak and fight? McCain says you have to get their help ( typically that's the way to go ) but the billions poured in are helping terrorist and making the likes of Musharraf and 10, J Q billionaires Was it politically incorrect to raise this point at any of the debates Lay man says Lay mam thinks!!
THX_1138 Posted October 13, 2008 Posted October 13, 2008 Regardless of who is the next president, the American war in Afghanistan is going to spill into the north west frontiers of Pakistan... and the latter's jingoistic feelings aside, united stated would be doing pakistan a solid with the war: they would help curb and possibly subjugate a region that is fiercely and egregiously autonomous and a breeding ground for considerable number of global terrorists. The difference however is that with a McCain presidency that is now delightfully less possible than before, the war would be found on the ground while the words exchanged would be of 'continual cooperation', and 'american and pakistani cooperation'... whereas under an Obama presidency, the war would be quite outright... there would be few illusions in words or actions about american operations in pakistan.
vadodaravictor Posted October 13, 2008 Posted October 13, 2008 Its about time. Either co-operate or do it forcefully. Enough of diplomacy with Pak. 7 & billions of dollars for nothing. Get it out from grass roots. This will be very good for India as we may see decreased cross border terrorism. Pak resources will diverted towards handling of American ground operation in Pakistan.
Recommended Posts