Worst Collapse

[Sachinism]

Whats the worst collapse in cricket history today Zimbabwe were 124-3 at one stage and ended up 127 ao, thats pretty bat 7 wickets for 3 runs

[h4te]

are you kidding me? :omg: wtf?.... hahahahahahahahha OMG hahahahahahahhahahahaha SIX STRAIGHT DUCKS. hahahahh WTF? hahahah

[sm332]

yeah ... that seems to be top 3 material for Intl cricket

[Holysmoke]

Zim is the "wost"

[Sachinism]

Has there been any worse than this?

[graphic23]

We lost like 5 wickets for 2 runs against Bangladesh in the WC right?

[SachDan]

Zimboks :hail::hail::hail::hail:

[vadodaravictor]

Whenever I read the word "collapse", Wall Street comes to my mind first these days :winky:

[guju24]

i have never seen like that before lolz...

[Shane]

Whenever I read the word "collapse"' date=' Wall Street comes to my mind first these days :winky:[/quote'] :giggle:

[Guest HariSampath]

7 wickets for 3 runs is pretty bad. but it was between 123 and 126 But not that bad considering NZ had been allout for 26 in a test innings, SAF had been allout for 30 twice, 35 once and India had been allout for 42 in a test :-) Amazing link..have fun :-) http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/content/records/145832.html

[Shane]

7 wickets for 3 runs is pretty bad. but it was between 123 and 126 But not that bad considering NZ had been allout for 26 in a test innings, SAF had been allout for 30 twice, 35 once and India had been allout for 42 in a test :-) Amazing link..have fun :-) http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/content/records/145832.html

England 61 15.4 3.89 2 v Australia Melbourne 1 Jan 1902 Almost 4 rpo, Quick Crash !!!

[Guest HariSampath]

^ and did you know they were all 5 ball overs then ?

[Shane]

^ and did you know they were all 5 ball overs then ?

Yup, Test Match no 66 had some bizzare set of events unfolding, 1. In the first innings only two bowlers bowled per side 2. Second innings saw a no.10 score a hundred for Australia, and there by being the top scorer !!! 3. The 40 wickets were shared amongst 5 bowlers !!! Glad i was not born in this era http://content-ind.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/62461.html

[Sachinism]

7 wickets for 3 runs is pretty bad. but it was between 123 and 126 But not that bad considering NZ had been allout for 26 in a test innings, SAF had been allout for 30 twice, 35 once and India had been allout for 42 in a test :-) Amazing link..have fun :-) http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/content/records/145832.html

That's the worst thing, they had a decent platform from where they could have posted a challenging total, but 7 wickets fell in a heap

[Sachin_Rulez]

7 wickets for 3 runs is pretty bad. but it was between 123 and 126 But not that bad considering NZ had been allout for 26 in a test innings, SAF had been allout for 30 twice, 35 once and India had been allout for 42 in a test :-) Amazing link..have fun :-) http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/content/records/145832.html

What's interesting about that stat is even though India were at the receiving end 7 times but never managed to bowl out any opposition team for <= 80 runs. Damn our bowlers :giggle:

[MundaPakistani]

7 wickets for 3 runs is pretty bad. but it was between 123 and 126 But not that bad considering NZ had been allout for 26 in a test innings, SAF had been allout for 30 twice, 35 once and India had been allout for 42 in a test :-) Amazing link..have fun :-) http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/content/records/145832.html

NZ also lost 7 wickets for 8 runs during the wellington test in 03-04. Whole series was turned on its head in literally 5 or 6 minutes