cowboysfan Posted April 18, 2009 Posted April 18, 2009 http://cgi.ebay.com/%20ws/%20eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=170322454911&fromMakeTrack=true Texas is up for sale -:hysterical:
Macj Posted April 18, 2009 Author Posted April 18, 2009 Im a big fan of Colbert and Stewart , but they are comedians, they don't disseminate news, they bring out the humor in it. Big difference. Anyways the thread has taken a dive to the netherworld and is pretty hilarious now.
Macj Posted April 18, 2009 Author Posted April 18, 2009 Dude' date=' I'm pretty sure he's not a comedian. He even did like a news report on the election night.[/quote'] His show along with Stewart's Daily Show is shown on Comedy Central. He is actually in character for the most part of the show and on all interviews as well. Only on NPR and 60 minutes was not in character and describes his approach towards slapstick and mocking the prevalence of bias in the news media.
SRT PWNS Posted April 19, 2009 Posted April 19, 2009 Mate you're calling me a coward but refuse to say whether you listen to and agree with Rush Limbaugh or not. Rush Limbaugh has nothing to do with this so why should I add more distraction to an argument for no reason at all? are you saying that Colbert has to kill people for you to accept he has balls? He doesn’t have to kill anyone. I’m just saying that the main difference between Colbert and Muslim extremists, is that Colbert criticizes the side that stands in the face of evil, where Muslim extremists actually attack it. Their goal is the same, just one has more balls than the other. Liberalism is evil and conservatism is good? Hmm. proof? Liberalism is the ideology of evil; the sole purpose is to go against the force of traditional good. This is dangerous because you start supporting evil and harming good when you do that. It’s not that hard to find examples, just look at his remarks on the Iraq war where countless terrorists have been killed. The proof is plain obvious, but you’re far too delusional to see. And you haven't disproved what I said about Jesus being less influential about Colbert. He has more influence on people than God does More people would disagree with the slaughtering of innocents by terrorists than those who actually agree with it and choose to restrict power that attempts to stop it, so therefore Colbert can’t be considered to have influence anywhere near Jesus and his teachings since they clearly support the side of good. since you love muslim extremists I’m not the one screaming and crying about stopping the Iraq war where lives are being saved from these savage terrorists, so that statement is illogical. Want to prove me wrong? Come up with some facts. I don’t need to prove you wrong, in the same way that I don’t need to prove that flying planes into buildings and killing thousands of people is wrong. The best way is not to disprove the plain proven, but to simply annihilate it and save the time; this is why terrorists are despised by the force of good. Forgive me for getting confused' date=' the original post from you consisted of amazing reasoning power, impeccable logic and a sophisticated sense of humor, so naturally I thought you were Colbert.[/quote'] The brain power you possess is amusing, not even Mr. Mohammed Blowthemallup can match that.
Macj Posted April 20, 2009 Author Posted April 20, 2009 go back to reading/watching Fox News. Now if he asks you to go back to watching MSNBC, will that a better argument make?
graphic23 Posted April 22, 2009 Posted April 22, 2009 http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/224922/april-20-2009/tip-wag---texas-secession---maca And you guys are saying he's evil.
triam Posted April 22, 2009 Posted April 22, 2009 Rush Limbaugh has nothing to do with this so why should I add more distraction to an argument for no reason at all? He doesn’t have to kill anyone. I’m just saying that the main difference between Colbert and Muslim extremists, is that Colbert criticizes the side that stands in the face of evil, where Muslim extremists actually attack it. Their goal is the same, just one has more balls than the other. Liberalism is the ideology of evil; the sole purpose is to go against the force of traditional good. This is dangerous because you start supporting evil and harming good when you do that. It’s not that hard to find examples, just look at his remarks on the Iraq war where countless terrorists have been killed. The proof is plain obvious, but you’re far too delusional to see. More people would disagree with the slaughtering of innocents by terrorists than those who actually agree with it and choose to restrict power that attempts to stop it, so therefore Colbert can’t be considered to have influence anywhere near Jesus and his teachings since they clearly support the side of good. I’m not the one screaming and crying about stopping the Iraq war where lives are being saved from these savage terrorists, so that statement is illogical. I don’t need to prove you wrong, in the same way that I don’t need to prove that flying planes into buildings and killing thousands of people is wrong. The best way is not to disprove the plain proven, but to simply annihilate it and save the time; this is why terrorists are despised by the force of good. The brain power you possess is amusing, not even Mr. Mohammed Blowthemallup can match that. Now I am utterly convinced you are Colbert.
suraj Posted April 22, 2009 Posted April 22, 2009 Bottomline is Texas ain't going to secede brother!!
Recommended Posts