Bradman99 Posted November 30, 2009 Posted November 30, 2009 He is set to play in the 2nd test match against West Indies as Hilfenhjaus misses out due to injury. How do you think he will go ? And do you guys rate him much ? I'm very happy for him that he's getting this chance as its been a long time coming and reckon that he's one to watch ouit for! Hope I haven't put the jinx on him lol.
Chandan Posted November 30, 2009 Posted November 30, 2009 I rate him a lot and think he'll be a big success on the flat track of Adelaide because he had bowled superbly on the flat tracks in the ODI series here in India. And WI batsmen are not anywhere as good as Indian batsmen are. So, all the best to him. The world cricket needs quality fast bowler and I'm quite certain that Bollinger is one in the making.
Mr. Wicket Posted November 30, 2009 Posted November 30, 2009 http://www.indiancricketfans.com/showthread.php?p=548439&highlight=bollinger#post548439 http://www.indiancricketfans.com/showthread.php?p=831985&highlight=bollinger#post831985 http://www.indiancricketfans.com/showthread.php?p=752671&highlight=bollinger#post752671 http://www.indiancricketfans.com/showpost.php?p=699990&postcount=49 Yeah, he's been mentioned here a bit. :winky: I am a huge fan and have been following his exploits for a while, as I'm a NSW/Blues supporter as well. BTW, it will be hard to put the jinx on him given the sort of crap he will be bowling to.
diegovegaz Posted November 30, 2009 Posted November 30, 2009 he bowls with a lot of heart will be rewarded
King Tendulkar Posted November 30, 2009 Posted November 30, 2009 He'll do more damage than Hilf I rate hilf and bollinger. No doubts there bowling in terms of pacers is very strong. Its suprsingly their batting which is not as strong as yester years. Also spin dept is very weak.
bharat297 Posted November 30, 2009 Posted November 30, 2009 He is a better bowler than Johnson in terms of his skills (accuracy, swing, bounce, etc.), even though Johnson is quicker. I think he will do well.
Guest Gunner Posted November 30, 2009 Posted November 30, 2009 I honestly think bollinger can do a good job in place of Hilfenhaus. And hey, just look at the opposition.
ViruRulez Posted November 30, 2009 Posted November 30, 2009 Bollinger is better than most present Aus pacers except Lee. He is surely better than Hilfy and Johnson
99.94 Posted December 1, 2009 Posted December 1, 2009 I would have preferred Clark but Bollinger is a good bowler and a pretty likeable guy.... mate. To Viru, I reckon Hilfy is awesome, probably better than Dougy.
ViruRulez Posted December 1, 2009 Posted December 1, 2009 I would have preferred Clark but Bollinger is a good bowler and a pretty likeable guy.... mate. To Viru, I reckon Hilfy is awesome, probably better than Dougy. Hilfy has been too inconsistent compared to others. He is good in tests but surely not fit for ODIs. Regarding Clark, he is good but I was saying about pacers and Clark is not a pacer.
Chandan Posted December 1, 2009 Posted December 1, 2009 Hilfy has been too inconsistent compared to others. He is good in tests but surely not fit for ODIs. Regarding Clark, he is good but I was saying about pacers and Clark is not a pacer. I would prefer a good test bowler anyday over a good One day bowler. Hilfenhaus is not even the first choice bowler in ODIs and had we done the same with Ishant, we'd not have to drop him like this.
Mr. Wicket Posted December 1, 2009 Posted December 1, 2009 I would have preferred Clark but Bollinger is a good bowler and a pretty likeable guy.... mate. To Viru, I reckon Hilfy is awesome, probably better than Dougy. I think Clark may be better in helpful conditions and maximizing the assistance of the pitch (I will not forget watching him rip through England at the MCG on day 3 under clouds and knocking over Pietersen in hysterical fashion, which led to some serious abuse from our side of the ground for KPP). But on drier or flatter tracks, Bollinger's additional pace and his sheer hit-the-deck aggression will be a much better asset.
Bradman99 Posted December 1, 2009 Author Posted December 1, 2009 Hilfy has been too inconsistent compared to others. He is good in tests but surely not fit for ODIs. Regarding Clark, he is good but I was saying about pacers and Clark is not a pacer. Agreed that Hilfy is no good for Odi's but he's pretty useful in tests.. Bollinger will prove to be a more then capable replacement though, I feel.
99.94 Posted December 1, 2009 Posted December 1, 2009 Yeah in a bouncy wicket Clark is a handful. But yeah Bollinger does well on flat decks and Adelaide is generally a road so he may be a good horse for the course. Yeah Hilfen sucks at ODIs but in tests I rate him very highly. Lee is injured, not sure whether he will retire or what..
Shane Posted January 24, 2010 Posted January 24, 2010 I can't quite fathom how he can be kept out of any International Team. Should be a regular in all three formats.
achilles Posted January 24, 2010 Posted January 24, 2010 If he stops acting like Shane Watson, he'll actually be a fairly successful bowler in his career
Bradman99 Posted January 24, 2010 Author Posted January 24, 2010 If he stops acting like Shane Watson' date=' he'll actually be a fairly successful bowler in his career[/quote'] Makes no sense. Good bowler is Bollinger, I've always rated him highly.
Mr. Wicket Posted January 24, 2010 Posted January 24, 2010 Makes no sense. I don't think achilles' posts exist to add sense, more for unintentional comedy (or proof of Einstein's suggestions of only two things being infinite). Meanwhile, nice to see Bubbles doing some more damage in the ODI series against Pak here. Hell of an opening spell last night!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now